eric draven and emily rudd enthusiast. writer.

she/her. twenty six.
Joined January 2025
i desperately miss writing with people and being creative, but the thought of going back to rp literally feels nauseating.
1
1
39
i was literally begging for interactions on my last few attempts. i miss 2020 rp (outside of all the constant drama) but damn at least you could easily get interactions.
2
⁎ ،̲،̲ 𝒌𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐥𝐥 . . . retweeted
38
227
7
3,519
33,982
and i got to meet one of my best friends yesterday!!! we met in the top gun verse in 2022 and now she’s one of my bridesmaids <3
11
⁎ ،̲،̲ 𝒌𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐥𝐥 . . . retweeted
I don’t give a fuck what Sam Altman declares. Why are we just letting these tech bros make these decisions for us? When did we all decide we don’t have any agency?
JUST IN: OpenAI CEO Sam Altman declares the world needs to “accept some bad things happening” in exchange for the benefits of AI.
160
7,026
74
38,168
360,044
⁎ ،̲،̲ 𝒌𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐥𝐥 . . . retweeted
1 year ago today, AJ Lee returned to WWE.
17
318
28
1,568
98,257
between this, getting engaged and being in maine for the first time, i was on cloud 9 this time last year
17
⁎ ،̲،̲ 𝒌𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐥𝐥 . . . retweeted
Judge James Peterson ruled that child sexual abuse material made with AI is legal. Show his face and shame him everywhere he goes.
First Amendment Protects Private Possession of AI-Generated Sexual Images of Fictional Children, Judge Rules
355
19,291
411
48,001
583,432
PARDON????
A federal appeals court ruled that the First Amendment protects an individual’s right to privately possess images or videos of child sexual abuse created using AI — if the material does not depict a real person and remains in the home. The court relied on Supreme Court precedents Stanley v. Georgia (1969), which established protections for the private possession of obscene material in the home, and Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition (2002), which ruled that certain virtual depictions involving no real children are protected by the First Amendment. The defendant in the case, Steven Anderegg, was charged with producing and distributing obscene AI-generated images and sending them to a minor over Instagram. The possession charge was dismissed under the Supreme Court precedents. The judge panel in the case has asked the Supreme Court to “reconsider legal precedents that predate advances in AI.” (washingtonpost.com/technolog…)
17
⁎ ،̲،̲ 𝒌𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐥𝐥 . . . retweeted
🕊️🕊️
191
89,420
529
430,424
3,504,246
⁎ ،̲،̲ 𝒌𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐥𝐥 . . . retweeted
greatest of all time. rest in peace king
2
574
10
4,321
55,797