L. Chilakilito®️ retweeted
Remember when the ministry sent a chinese spy to literally get Harry Potter arrested
En la misa de León XIV, ante en el Presidente Milei, el Papa leyó el pasaje del evangelio en el que Jesús HECHA A LATIGAZOS a los mercaderes judíos del templo porque lo habían convertido en un negocio. Tenés que cerrar la iglesia, los santos hacen esto 🚬
Se vienen cositas 👀
#AyerEnVeracruz Cientos de aves volando muy bajo y en parvadas masivas sorprendieron en Veracruz. ¿Alguien sabe si esto es normal o presagio de algo? 👀👇🏼
4
386
L. Chilakilito®️ retweeted
the last thing jensen huang did before leaking nvidia's AI blueprint to his chinese girlfriend who was spying for china.
L. Chilakilito®️ retweeted
Jimmy Carr explica por qué no hace chistes sobre el islam, pero sí sobre el cristianismo.
Si es una anciana, niña, discapacitada o está preñada, si se les cede. Si no cumple con alguna de esas características, entonces puede ser micromachismo y como nadie quiere ser considerado micromachista, entonces no se debe ceder el lugar.
Al honorable consejo de hombres...
Los hombres, por muy cansados que vengan del trabajo, ¿están obligados a cederles el asiento a las finas damas que, no conformes con contar con unidades exclusivas para ellas, todavía los exhiben en redes sociales?
37
L. Chilakilito®️ retweeted
Cuando sales de la ducha y te encuentras a tu novia con tu teléfono en la mano y llorando:
Por supuesto que también compartiría con ella toda la info de IA que supiera, si yo fuese un multimillonario tech 🤤
12
L. Chilakilito®️ retweeted
"Yo solo fui el culpable en mi fracaso
Porque pude haber sido el rey del mundo, pero encontré mujeres a mi paso"
- Jensen Huang, CEO de Nvidia
L. Chilakilito®️ retweeted
"In the book 1984, which many women will be unfamiliar with because it doesn't contain any werewolf rape"
One of the amusing things about women is that one will walk past a conversation that isn't about her, has nothing to do with her, and immediately interrupt it to say "Hey everybody! This does not sexually arouse me! In fact quite the opposite!"
And then she'll wonder why everyone seems to find that response incoherent.
It's only funny, however, until you truly understand why it's happening. Then it's kinda... existential.
Pick up a popular book, written by women, for women. At random. We all know that the odds are it's going to be porn.
In fact, it's gonna be porn about the medium-height, slightly clumsy, brown-haired protagonist girl being kidnapped and ravished by a werewolf pirate billionaire warlord. And if you're wondering what "ravished" means, it's like rape, but sexier.
So what's going on here? Why are modern women so porn-brained, and simultaneously so contemptuous of every actual male within their line of sight?
This actually all fits together quite neatly. Women are not lying. They are telling us the truth. They are telling us exactly how they feel about all the things they see. They're just not very good at introspection. So they don't know why they feel that way.
If we read their werewolf rape porn, we can immediately see what turns women on... men who have power over them.
And the reason that women are reading werewolf rape porn is that actual men who have power over them are in short supply, and there's not enough to go around. Desperate for male dominance, they are mainlining a hypernormal stimulus in fictional form.
This is also the reason women don't care about any harm they are doing to men with their newfound political and social power. To them, any man who doesn't have power over them, and especially a man who they have the power to hurt, is viscerally disgusting. He is an unperson, useless to them, and they don't care what he is experiencing.
This is why they try to hurt men in the first place. Because they resent the fact that they can. They want us to be powerful, invincible, untouchable, and they lash out in frustration when we aren't, seeking to punish us for being vulnerable instead.
Funny thing is, it's not even their fault. This is genetic programming, after all, not a choice. Ovaries want what they want.
The bit they don't quite understand, however, the bit they haven't thought through, is that this doesn't work with the whole "equality" thing. A man can be more powerful than you, or he can be an equal. Can't be both.
And, of course, men really do have power over women. Not only are they unable to defend themselves against us, they need us to feed, clothe, shelter and protect them. If we were collectively willing to take their civil rights away again, we could do so immediately.
Women's rights exist only when and where men say they do.
In the book 1984, which many women will be unfamiliar with because it doesn't contain any werewolf rape, George Orwell describes a process called "doublethink", which is defined as "sustaining two contradictory ideas by not ever thinking about both of them at the same time."
In this case, the two ideas are "make me equal to you in power throughout society at large", and "have so much more power in our personal relationship that I am unable to hurt you no matter what I say or do".
Eventually, men are simply going to have to come to a consensus over what to do about this, and decide which of these requests to fulfill.
We can either be liberals, and accept perpetual female contempt as the price of that, or we can be vilified as reactionaries, but have women love us again.
What is never going to happen is that you are never going to get a majority of women to see the contradiction here, and agree that this makes no sense.
Which means we are going to have to make this decision on our own.
Loco, increíble que el futuro tecnológico de la humanidad esté en manos de una tipa que puede pasar como la hermana de Yoko ono. Bien dicen que, ante la duda hacerte un manuelazo te ahorra muchos problemas.
25


































