What's happening with $XPR?

Even the website links to BSV Blockchain. When you click Buy BSV it sells you a base token instead. Super weird this was even allowed.

BTC at one million dollars would not merely enrich a few men who mistake price appreciation for economic productivity. Under the present reward structure, mining would attempt to consume around 2,400 terawatt-hours a year, roughly seven per cent of global electricity. That would already be extraordinary. Unfortunately, Bitcoin would not be bidding for power in an empty room. AI data centres are expanding rapidly. Cloud computing is expanding. Semiconductor fabrication, electric vehicles, heat pumps, industrial electrification and population growth are all demanding additional generation, transmission capacity and cooling. Every serious economy is already discovering that announcing a data centre is considerably easier than building the grid required to power it. At one million dollars per BTC, mining becomes another enormous industrial claimant upon electricity. It competes directly with AI infrastructure, factories, hospitals, transport, households and every government attempting to electrify its economy. Regional grids would not politely manufacture seven per cent more power because a speculative asset had enjoyed an excellent afternoon. At five million dollars, the proposition becomes grotesque. Mining would attempt to consume around 11,800 terawatt-hours annually—more electricity than the United States presently uses, and potentially between a quarter and two-thirds of world supply under the model’s range. At the same time, technology companies would be constructing increasingly vast AI campuses, each requiring power, water, cooling, transmission and backup generation. The world would therefore be asked to finance two simultaneous electrical appetites: one training machines to produce answers, and another making machines guess numbers that serve no purpose beyond maintaining the price structure that created the appetite. One may criticise AI, but at least a data centre can produce computation, research, software, logistics, medical analysis or services. BTC mining at this scale would consume comparable infrastructure merely to preserve artificial scarcity and transfer ownership entries. At five million dollars, miners would attempt to spend more than half a trillion dollars each year on electricity. They would not simply buy surplus power. They would bid electricity away from other users. Household bills would rise. Industrial production would become more expensive. AI facilities would bid against miners for grid connections. Governments would choose which data centres received power, which factories remained open, and which speculative furnaces were permitted to continue glowing. The market would not respond with infinite new generation. It would respond first with higher prices, congestion, rationing, political intervention and the sudden discovery by libertarians that electricity grids are physical institutions rather than inspirational metaphors. At ten million dollars per BTC, mining would attempt to consume around 23,700 terawatt-hours annually, with the upper estimate exceeding current world electricity production. The model would require miners to spend more than one trillion dollars a year in an electricity market worth only a few trillion. Meanwhile, AI demand would still be growing.