David Opsahl retweeted
Someone sent me a post that said this on it about the murder of Liverpool’s Ken Bigley:
“These are the last images of Ken Bigley.
Moments before he knew his head was to be hacked off on camera.
I was sent the video years ago.
Not because of murder porn but as a warning of what will come if we don't stop it.
It changed me as a man.
Mohammed Yaseem took his time.
Smiled at the camera.
He took his time removing Kens head while still conscious.
Thats the idea.
The same as the videos of Jewish women having their breasts cut off and thrown around like a ball as she lays there screaming knowing whats coming next.
They kept him in a cage for hours telling him his inevitable fate.
Unimaginable cruelty.
His crime.... being a westerner.
His killer Mohamed Yaseen
Mohammed Yaseen is also responsible for setting fire to women and girls in cages for not submitting to Islam.
He burned them alive.
Laughing and shouting Allahu Akbar.
God is great
Setting fire to children and women and slowly removing another humans head whilst praising a sky wizard.....
Have a wild guess where he lives now????
Windsor.
Seen shopping in the Co Op
We know he's not working so your paying his rent, utilities and food bill.
Our government won't deport him or lock him up.
Where's the fuckin morality?”
It is truly terrifying what we are allowing our government to do to us.
David Opsahl retweeted
Let me break down what I'm seeing and hearing here from DR.
I don't know DR's source for these materials , but they appear completely legit and are profoundly disturbing.
These are leading members of the Democrat Party hatching up the following strategy:
1. After the midterms, use the DSA to incite and carry out violent civil unrest.
2. Make the violent civil unrest so bad that Trump must invoke the Insurrection Act.
3. Use the invocation of the Insurrection Act to create a national sense of illegitimacy whereby Democrat governors appear justified in taking the extreme action of refusing to acknowledge federal authority and push to form a new form of federal government via various means, including an Article V transformation of the Constitution.
Maybe there is more to this and it's not as bad as it seems, but right now this appears to be a conspiracy to create the next Fort Sumter.
This is a CIA-style color revolution in real time, on our own soil.
(Of course the legacy media is nowhere near this--it takes us Internet randos to get the word out.)
The past few days, I got my hands on thousands of new transcripts and hundreds of recordings, thanks to leads from @SKDoubleDub33 and @iamlisalogan .
You've heard that the DSA is proposing structural reforms to America, including abolishing the Senate and imposing term limits.
What you not have heard is - there is an operational plan to put it all into action. If the Democratic Party sweeps 2026, then DSA will become "foot soldiers" in constant clashes with the administration to cross a "red line" or invoke a "doomsday scenario" - meaning, President Trump invokes the Insurrection Act, probably sometime in 2027.
Then, a lot of coordinated responses kick off, including delegitimizing the federal government itself and handing that legitimacy to Democratic governors. 2028 then becomes a vote on whether to keep America governance as-is or to burn it all down to appease a "young and brown" demographic.
The mysterious group who's been coordinating 50501, Indivisible, and coordinating the NoKings protests is called "United Democracy Alliance" and their intellectual leader is Erica Chenoweth who came up with the 3.5% rule of nonviolent regime change.
Patience. I know I've hyped this more than anything else. It's genuinely the biggest discovery I've had. This is an enormous archive. This is only the beginning.
David Opsahl retweeted
The past few days, I got my hands on thousands of new transcripts and hundreds of recordings, thanks to leads from @SKDoubleDub33 and @iamlisalogan .
You've heard that the DSA is proposing structural reforms to America, including abolishing the Senate and imposing term limits.
What you not have heard is - there is an operational plan to put it all into action. If the Democratic Party sweeps 2026, then DSA will become "foot soldiers" in constant clashes with the administration to cross a "red line" or invoke a "doomsday scenario" - meaning, President Trump invokes the Insurrection Act, probably sometime in 2027.
Then, a lot of coordinated responses kick off, including delegitimizing the federal government itself and handing that legitimacy to Democratic governors. 2028 then becomes a vote on whether to keep America governance as-is or to burn it all down to appease a "young and brown" demographic.
The mysterious group who's been coordinating 50501, Indivisible, and coordinating the NoKings protests is called "United Democracy Alliance" and their intellectual leader is Erica Chenoweth who came up with the 3.5% rule of nonviolent regime change.
Patience. I know I've hyped this more than anything else. It's genuinely the biggest discovery I've had. This is an enormous archive. This is only the beginning.
David Opsahl retweeted
As many of you know, in recent days Data Republican has been releasing transcripts, videos and audio recordings of a group of groups plotting to use violence to force President Trump to take protective actions (i.e., the Insurrection Act) that will result in the overthrow of our Constitution in favor of the will of Democrat governors.
These groups include former USAID employees and other ex-national security officials, and the plans they discuss are straight out of the color revolution tactics, techniques and procedures those same people have been using for decades to overthrow foreign governments unfriendly to the USA.
This is the biggest news story in decades, right?
Yet no one in the mainstream media will touch it.
Except to defend it.
See the below headline from today’s Washington Post (I’ll link to the full article below).
The plotters behind this effort are obviously alarmed by the recent public uncovering of their conspiracy, so they have done what any reputable Democrat determined to overthrow the electoral choices of the American people would do: run to a friendly press outlet to drop a soft-pedaled puff piece to run top cover for their efforts, and blame Trump.
If you read this article, it does not talk about a coup conspiracy. Instead it talks about a bunch of well-meaning, patriotic, anonymous ex-national security officials simply trying to protect America from the evil dictator Trump destroying “our democracy.”
This article itself is straight out of the color revolution tactics—it’s propaganda designed to condition a populace to accept illegitimate actions.
The Washington Post is part of the plot.
Stay frosty, friends. This will get worse before it gets better.
David Opsahl retweeted
In Scotland it has been illegal to sell a glass of raw milk since 1983. The farmer may drink it. His children may drink it. The man at the gate may not buy it, and the dairy farmer who sells it to him has committed a crime.
England kept a loophole: the farmer may sell it at the farm, and nowhere else. Not in a shop. Not to a café. It must carry a warning, and the inspector comes twice a year. In most of the United States it is a felony to carry it over a state line, and armed federal agents have raided Amish farms in Pennsylvania to seize it.
This is milk as it comes from the cow. The food every mammal on earth starts life on, which fed this island for six thousand years before anybody boiled it. Pasteurisation was invented for the swill dairies of the Victorian cities, where cows stood in their own filth under distilleries and the milk killed children, and it was the right answer to that. The clean farm was never the problem. The clean farm got the same law.
What raw milk carries that the heated kind does not is the point of it: the enzymes that digest it, the living cultures, the proteins that fold properly only until the temperature goes past them. The people who drink it will tell you that children who could not stomach the carton can drink the churn. The authorities will tell you that is anecdote and that the risk is unacceptable, and then license the sale of raw oysters, raw beef, raw fish and raw eggs without a word.
A thousand farms in England sell it legally and their waiting lists are long. North of the border a woman can drive to a farm, look at the cow, and be refused a pint of what it made that morning.
Nobody banned milk. They banned the kind with anything left in it.
David Opsahl retweeted
This is nonsense.
No one targeted her for her vile antisemitism, hatred of America, and downplaying of 9/11.
Her actions caused this. You can scream my democracy into the void. We are a constitutional republic and there was more than enough evidence to raid her home.
Misuse of campaign funds: Minnesota regulators found that she improperly used campaign money for personal accounting expenses and travel, ordering repayment of $3,469.23 and a $500 civil penalty.
Improper joint tax filings: The campaign-finance investigation documented joint returns with Ahmed Hirsi for 2014 and 2015, although she was legally married to Ahmed Nur Said Elmi.
Alleged personal enrichment through campaign payments to her husband’s firm: Campaign filings showed $2.78 million in payments over approximately 15 months to E Street Group, co-owned by Tim Mynett.
Feeding Our Future—campaign donations from people implicated in the scheme: Campaign records documented $5,400 from two donors whom FBI affidavits identified as controlling shell companies that received $1.1 million in child-nutrition money.
Feeding Our Future—a reported former campaign worker’s fraud conviction: Guhaad Hashi Said, reported to have worked on her campaigns, pleaded guilty to wire-fraud and money-laundering conspiracies in August 2025. DOJ records establish that his operation obtained approximately $2.9 million through fraudulent meal claims.
Feeding Our Future—communications between her office and defendants: Minnesota fraud-oversight chair Kristin Robbins stated that texts and emails between Omar’s office and defendants appeared in the United States v. Bock trial exhibits, and sought those communications through a congressional subpoena request.
Alleged refusal to cooperate with the Feeding Our Future inquiry: Robbins alleged that Omar refused requests for records and an interview, prompting her request for federal congressional intervention.
Alleged marriage fraud: The allegation concerns her legal marriage to Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, who may be her brother, alongside irregularities in her marriage and tax timeline.
Alleged immigration fraud: Reuters reports that federal investigators searched her home on October 12, 2026, with the investigation including childhood immigration paperwork completed by her father.
Alleged false financial disclosures: Her original congressional disclosure valued assets at $6 million–$30 million, while the amended filing reduced them to $18,004–$95,000.
It is a basic principle of American democracy that the government can’t selectively target individuals simply because of their political beliefs or what they say. But that’s exactly what the Trump Administration is doing to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar of Minnesota.
To understand why this is so appalling, it’s important to know the facts. Congresswoman Omar came to this country with her father when she was 12 years old. Five years later, her father became a naturalized citizen. If Ilhan had been 18 at the time, she would have had to apply for citizenship separately. But because she was 17, she became a naturalized citizen automatically.
Congresswoman Omar went on to graduate from college, work as a community organizer, become the first Somali-American legislator elected to public office in the U.S., and win a seat in Congress. There, she has been one of the Trump Administration’s fiercest critics, which has led the president to repeatedly single her out as someone who he believes does not belong in this country.
Now the Administration is actively trying to deport Congresswoman Omar, seemingly based solely on the unsubstantiated theory that she was actually 18 when her father was naturalized, and therefore is not a citizen. Federal agents have raided her home, confiscated personal records, and seized her phone — all to try and uncover a nonexistent smoking gun from 20 years ago that will somehow make their case.
Think about that. The full weight of the federal government is being brought down on a law-abiding elected official because she has dared to criticize the president. And it’s not the first time this has happened. Under President Trump, the Justice Department has repeatedly gone after those he considers his political enemies — from the Attorney General of New York, to the former head of the FBI, to members of the Federal Reserve.
In those cases, the prosecutions either stalled or were dismissed for having no basis in law, and the same is likely to happen in this case. But not before Congresswoman Omar’s life has been turned upside down, her legal bills have piled up, and she’s been forced to spend time fighting unsubstantiated charges instead of serving the people of Minnesota.
The fact that any president, or any administration, is willing to engage in such transparent efforts to intimidate someone should outrage all Americans, regardless of how they feel about Congresswoman Omar’s political views. Because if this becomes the new normal, there’s no reason to believe it will stop with her — or that future presidents, in either party, won’t do the same.
David Opsahl retweeted
The left vilifies and co-opts words and terms so they can then use those terms to attack anyone that disagrees with them.
They vilified conservative.
They vilified pro life.
They vilified right wing.
They vilified MAGA.
They vilified all lives matter.
They vilified the 2nd Amendment.
They co-opted America first.
They co-opted isolationism.
They vilified Zionism.
Yet they promote DSA, Marxism, Islamism, abortion, BLM, gun control, America last, America only, and anti-Israel sentiments.
Everything they say is bad is good.
Everything they say is good is bad.
Thank you for listening to my TED Talk.
David Opsahl retweeted
When your car stops halfway home because the chip inside detected that you have used your monthly allowance of gasoline.
Remember that it started with a mask and a shot, and you complied….
David Opsahl retweeted
Replying to @NickJFreitas
Remind liberals that your kids are safer at school than home with mom
David Opsahl retweeted
Liberals are mad about flying cars because they still think their creative ones when in reality...
David Opsahl retweeted
Pro-tax people are idiots.
All of them.
And I will die on this hill.
They are slaves to the state who moan, “Govern me harder, daddy.”
I’m fine with a one-time sales tax at the point of purchase. That’s it. That’s all we need to fund the most basic functions of the government.
Every other tax we pay is unnecessary and if it means that revenue falls short of meeting the budget, the budget is bloated and should be cut. Just like at the federal level, there is plenty to eliminate, consolidate, or trim within state and local governments.
David Opsahl retweeted
This is exactly what electing @AbdulElSayed and his other Democrat colleagues will bring to America.
This is WHY he wants open borders.
Those guys are awesome! 3/1 was deployed into LA from Camp Pendleton to quell the riots. Some of my fellow Marines got to patrol the Korean area. I had to guard a mall.
David Opsahl retweeted
When you peel back the layers of extreme worst-case scenarios, the picture becomes clear: we are witnessing an unprecedented transfer of wealth and sovereignty, designed to secure political control before the climate narrative bubble bursts.
Today, people everywhere face a carefully manicured double barrier: an energy agenda shrouded in dense scientific jargon, and a United Nations framework that is utterly opaque. Just voicing a valid common-sense concern has been effectively criminalised. The greatest weapon of this climate campaign is its deliberate complexity.
These same actors are quietly dismantling national sovereignty and replacing local democracy with a centralised, unaccountable regime. This is not just bureaucratic overreach; it is a psychological operation executed through calculated PR hits.
When the UN leadership deploys terms like 'global boiling,' it signals a shift from empirical debate to emotional blackmail. By anchoring public policy to extreme scenarios, the architects of this agenda aim to manufacture a permanent state of hyper-emergency.
Under the banner of saving the planet, a deeper political transformation is taking place. Behind the visible leadership of figures like António Guterres stands a vast, unelected apparatus - thousands of faceless bureaucrats embedded within the UN payroll. Beyond them lies an eager corporate sector, waiting to cash in on an energy transition projected to absorb $275 trillion.
This supranational network operates a form of ultra-socialism on a global scale. Socialism has become aligned to new globalism: controlling industrial policy, rationing energy access and demanding trillions in cross-border wealth redistribution - code for the UN-controlled carbon credits scheme.


































