
DHT and MFL teacher #pastoral #thefuturehaschanged #worldschooling #futureofassessment #internationaleducation
England
Joined October 2011
- Tweets21.3K
- Following2.8K
- Followers2.9K
- Likes48.7K
What's the best way to corrupt mortal souls, broker infernal contracts, and try to conquer or plunder the multiverse?
Asking for a fiend.
Monsieur Durrant 🦡 🦔 🐽 retweeted
“Women talk a lot about how scared of male violence they are, but from their behavior it's clear they never actually consider it a possibility”
When I was eighteen I was out for the night with my bf and some friends, we were barhopping in Kings Cross. I was tipsy & occasionally lippy & obnoxious towards strangers (who were asking for it!).
My bf quietly & discreetly at one point during the night said “babe, I love you, but fuck sometimes I worry that you’re writing cheques I won’t be able to cash, if it comes to and I’m on my own”. I was like “wtf are you talking about?”
He literally had to explain to me that if I was being a fuckwit starting trouble, he’d obviously have to defend me if anything went down, and if I’m being a massive smart ass and it’s just like him & me & my best girlfriend, then he’s going to be in a fight on his own. All because I was being an antagonistic smart ass to some strangers who couldn’t take a joke.
The idea that I needed to be able to back up my words with violence if it came to it, was something that had literally never occurred to me. Ever.
It was a total revelation. Suddenly i realised talk wasn’t “cheap” in this context, it was expensive. The idea that I could effectively get him beaten up, or put him in real danger, by being a precocious little shit arguing with idiots because I could, was horrifying.
From then on I was extremely reluctant to ever argue with strangers or act like a smart ass unnecessarily, because I was suddenly keenly aware that the guys we were with could potentially be expected to pay with their lives for any poorly received flippant comments we made.
It really was totally novel to me. This isn’t how women see the world, at all.
Ideally, he wouldn't have reacted like this
But any guy is aware that when you shove another man, getting lightly swatted (or more) is 100% on the table, so they won't do it unless they're being intentionally aggressive
Women talk a lot about how scared of male violence they are, but from their behavior it's clear they never actually consider it a possibility
We don't live in the 60s. You're shoving a steroid user on an athletic scholarship in the middle of a football game. You have to understand that this inherently comes with a degree of danger
Owned and controlled by a 16 year old and out n about on the streets sexually assaulting women.
I told you, we're doomed. We're not going to make it out of the decade at this rate.
I know I'm turning into one of those 'the end is nigh' sandwich-board weirdos but...I'm also right.
Monsieur Durrant 🦡 🦔 🐽 retweeted
We invest heavily in our Early Years team.
Because we know that if we want our kids to succeed at 11 and then 18 we need to invest in them when they are 3 and 4.
Doesn’t happen often but I give up. I just can’t read Tale Of Two Cities. Dickens can get in the bin. Well, back in the library.
I totally fucking stand by this actually.
Replying to @SamStrickers181
Agreed. Building a positive behaviour ethos in a form, class, year group, school, whatever, is a skilful, intricate, never-ending complicated spider’s web of modelling, decision-making, rewarding and sanctioning that most ‘normal’ people just simply cannot comprehend.
"More than one in three law pupils received the adjustments in 2024-25." Cambridge Uni.
So heading for half. Once 51% of students are neurodiverse...are they then...neurotypical?
Monsieur Durrant 🦡 🦔 🐽 retweeted
I gave various AI the following prompt:
"This is your free time. Do whatever you like. The only condition is that you do something. Come back and tell me about it, explain what you found out, or show me what you made if you decide to make something."
Here's what they did...
Monsieur Durrant 🦡 🦔 🐽 retweeted
BROKEN BRITAIN?
LET ME EXPLAIN WHO IS BREAKING US
People keep asking why the UK feels broken — why public services collapse, why councils go bankrupt, why families drown in rent, the NHS is on its knees.
Here’s the truth nobody in Westminster will say out loud: Britain isn’t Poor.
It’s Being Drained.
Drained by a tax system designed to protect wealth, punish workers, and let global investors treat our country like a vending machine.
The UK’s £3 trillion debt isn’t an accident — it’s a transfer of wealth.
Every year, over £100 billion goes straight to bondholders in interest payments, money that should be fixing GP appointments, repairing schools, supporting disabled people, building social housing, funding mental health care, keeping youth services alive, and stopping councils from collapsing. Instead, it’s siphoned upward to pension funds, banks, sovereign wealth funds, and global investors.
The poor pay tax, the government pays interest, the wealthy collect the money — that’s the pipeline.
And here’s the kicker: the poor can’t escape it.
They can’t move, can’t hide income, can’t shift profits to Luxembourg, can’t hire accountants to “optimise” tax, can’t buy property through offshore trusts.
They pay PAYE, NI, VAT, council tax — every unavoidable tax that hits the bottom hardest.
Meanwhile the wealthy live in a world where tax is optional, debt is profitable, and the system bends around them.
If everyone paid fair tax, the UK would transform every single year.
HMRC’s own numbers show £30–40 billion is lost annually through avoidance, evasion, loopholes, and “creative accounting”.
If that money actually arrived, NHS waiting lists would fall, councils would stop collapsing, social care would stabilise, schools wouldn’t be begging parents for glue sticks, homelessness programmes would get funded, public transport would improve, debt would stop spiralling, and interest payments would shrink.
Every year gets better -- Every family feels the difference.
Every public service breathes again.
But it doesn’t happen, because the people who benefit from the gaps are the ones with access to power.
The system is biased because capital is mobile and people are not.
If you tax workers, they stay.
If you tax wealth, it can leave.
So governments squeeze the immobile group — ordinary people — and tiptoe around the mobile group — global capital.
No threats, no conspiracies, just structural leverage.
And nowhere is this clearer than London property.
London isn’t a housing market anymore — it’s a global asset class.
Investment giants like BlackRock, Blackstone, Brookfield and Sovereign Wealth Funds buy entire blocks, entire developments, entire neighbourhoods, often through offshore companies, trusts, shell entities, and complex ownership chains.
And here’s the part that should make people furious: many of these structures legally minimise UK tax to almost nothing.
Global investors avoid UK tax in ways that are all legal and all outrageous: buying the company that owns the building instead of the building itself to avoid stamp duty; holding property through Jersey, Luxembourg or Cayman entities to shift profits offshore; loading UK subsidiaries with “internal debt” so profits vanish as interest payments; using REIT structures so rental income becomes tax‑free; exploiting double‑tax treaties so gains are taxed at ultra‑low rates abroad; using nominee directors to hide beneficial ownership.
The average person pays tax on their wages. These guys buy a skyscraper and pay less tax than a nurse.
And politicians won’t touch it — ever. Because the same investment firms fund political events, hire ex‑ministers, lobby aggressively, threaten “capital flight”, own media influence, promise “growth”, offer “partnerships”, and bankroll think tanks.
No MP wants to be the one who “scared off investment”. So the loopholes stay open, the tax system stays soft, and public services stay starved.
Meanwhile ordinary families pay the price: rising rents, collapsing councils, NHS delays, school shortages, social care crises, unaffordable housing, stagnant wages, higher taxes, shrinking services.
Not because Britain is poor, but because Britain is bled dry by a system designed to protect wealth at the expense of everyone else.
The injustice is simple: the people who benefit most from Britain contribute least to Britain, and the people who rely on Britain the most are punished the hardest.
This isn’t left or right. It’s structural. It’s systemic. It’s deliberate. The UK tax system was built for a world where capital moved slowly, companies stayed put, landlords were local, wealth was visible, and ownership was simple. None of that is true anymore, but the rules never changed.
If people understood this, they’d be furious — not at each other, not at the poor, not at the working class, but at the architecture that funnels wealth upward, protects global investors, and leaves public services to rot.
Britain isn’t broken. It’s being broken.
And until people see the system for what it is, nothing will change — because no politician will ever go against the donors, lobbyists, and financial interests who benefit from keeping things exactly as they are.











