@freedom_hrd_on Just an American. A Marine. An armed citizen is the buffer to tyranny. Kill the woke mind virus, and do it while smoking a quality cigar.
Earth
Joined July 2021
- Tweets2.7K
- Following9
- Followers356
- Likes2.9K
DBabe retweeted
EXC: A Washington think tank whose immigration program receives Soros funding has identified hundreds of American counties as destinations for migrants. 96.5% of selected counties are majority White .
Residents would have no say.
Its November 2025 immigration blueprint urges policymakers to “enable local governments and private entities to sponsor immigrants directly.” It also proposes state visa programs and “incentivizing new arrivals to stay in specific states and regions.”
Two weeks later, Niskanen published its Migration Match Index, assessing American communities for their capacity to accommodate more immigration.
The report describes places with “aging, stagnant, or insufficient native labor supply.” It weighs factors including job openings, rental vacancies, affordability, unemployment, and age.
The authors explicitly discuss using updated data to plan resettlement following “an influx of asylum seekers at the border.” They also contemplate applications to a future refugee-admissions system.
Niskanen’s own funding disclosure lists $300,000 from Open Society Foundation for immigration work, covering the period when both documents were published. Other donors include the Rockefeller Family Fund and the Pritzker Family Foundation.
The organization already has a record of helping turn private sponsorship into policy.
Its 2025 annual report says it “helped conceive and implement” Welcome Corps, the private refugee-sponsorship program established under Biden.
DBabe retweeted
Democrats will shout and scream, call you a bigot, nazi, fascist, racist, misogynist, sexist threat to democracy, then lose their ever-loving minds and call you “divisive” when you come to the logical conclusion that maybe we’re no longer “fellow citizens” simply debating issues.
Understand something. The name-calling is not hyperbole, those names are what they think we actually are. The real tactic at this stage is them feigning outrage when you notice.
They need you to see this as the same old debates between left and right so you don't see this for what it has become. A clash of diametrically opposed worldviews that can't coexist with one another.
Don't believe me?
Ok…how do you share a constitutional republic built upon Christian morality, English common law traditions, property rights, and limited government with a political movement that not only doesn't want those things, but believes they are oppressive tools of the patriarchy that must be “decolonized” and replaced with a largely Marxist interpretation of economics and a hedonistic interpretation of morality?
When John Adams said our Constitution was written for a moral and religious people and is totally unsuited to the government of any other, that wasn't just flowery political talk. He wasn't making a campaign speech. He was making an observation about objective reality.
And by the way, that opinion is not just shared by those of us who admire Adams, it's shared by those who hate him.
The DSA agrees that our constitution is “totally unsuitable” for the country they want. Which is why they openly talk about fighting, dismantling, and replacing it.
In a recent poll, 59% of Democrats said they support the DSA. So this is not some insignificant “fringe” on the left. It's the emergent wing that Democratic leadership recognizes it is dependent upon to take control.
So understand that their outrage at you seeing this fight for what it is, is how they keep you from fighting it the way it needs to be fought.
What's sad is their tactic might just work.
DBabe retweeted
The enemies are gaining ground. The rest of us are arguing on a platform designed to suppress our voices.
Keep yelling into the void.
DBabe retweeted
For those that still don’t understand what Benghazi was all about:
🚨So here's the REAL story:
Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to secretly retrieve US made Stinger Missiles that the State Dept had supplied to Ansar al Sharia in Libya WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission.
Sec State Hillary Clinton had brokered the Libya deal through Ambassador Stevens and a Private Arms Dealer named Marc Turi, but some of the shoulder fired Stinger Missiles ended up in Afghanistan where they were used against our own military. On July 25th, 2012, a US Chinook helicopter was downed by one of them. Not destroyed only because the idiot Taliban didn't arm the missile. The helicopter didn't explode, but it had to land and an ordnance team recovered the missile’s serial number which led back to a cache of Stinger Missiles kept in
Qatar by the CIA.
Obama and Hillary were in full panic mode, so Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to retrieve the rest of the Stinger Missiles. This was a "do-or-die" mission, which explains the Stand Down Orders given to multiple rescue teams during the siege of the US Embassy.
It was the State Dept, NOT the CIA, that supplied the Stinger Missiles to our sworn enemies because Gen. Petraeus at CIA would not approve supplying the deadly missiles due to their potential use against commercial aircraft. So then, Obama threw Gen. Petraeus under the bus when he refused to testify in support of Obama’s phony claim of a “spontaneous uprising caused by a YouTube video that insulted Muslims.”
Obama and Hillary committed TREASON!
THIS is what the investigation is all about, WHY she had a Private Server, (in order to delete the digital evidence), and WHY Obama, two weeks after the attack, told the UN that the attack was the result of the YouTube video, even though everyone KNEW it was not.
Furthermore, the Taliban knew that the administration had aided and abetted the enemy WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission, so they began pressuring (blackmailing) the Obama Administration to release five Taliban generals being held at Guantanamo.
Bowe Bergdahl was just a useful pawn used to cover the release of the Taliban generals. Everyone knew Bergdahl was a traitor but Obama used Bergdahl’s exchange for the five Taliban generals to cover that Obama was being coerced by the Taliban about the unauthorized Stinger Missile deal.
So we have a traitor as POTUS that is not only corrupt, but compromised, as well and a Sec of State that is a serial liar, who perjured herself multiple times at the Congressional Hearings on Benghazi. Perhaps this is why no military aircraft were called upon for help in Benghazi: because the administration knew that our enemies had Stinger Missiles that, if used to down those planes, would likely be traced back to the CIA cache in Qatar and then to the State Dept’s illegitimate arms deal in Libya.
Forward this again and again and again until everyone reads the true story of Benghazi.
DBabe retweeted
Alright, MFs! Another mean rock thrower is being given away and this time the story is short. Why is that? Well @TheRascallion just refused to elaborate about what, exactly, he'd gotten himself into. All he would say is that the @Springfield_Inc Kuna sure does perform well in a tight spot. The @VortexOptics Crossfire was nuthin' to sniff at either.
So... We are all glad Rascal made it back, from wherever he went and whatever trouble he was in to, and we are DOUBLY glad to have @SummRidge partnering with us on this GIVEAWAY! The good people there got wind of what Rascal had in mind and wanted to chip in so we could give away the Vortex and THREE EXTRA MAGS as well! That is a total of 5 mags coming with this mean little sub gun!
SO! FOLLOW US AND @SummRidge , REPOST or QUOTE POST, and REPLY TO ENTER THIS GIVEAWAY!
Appreciate you all and good luck this week!
🤖 Made with AI
DBabe retweeted
Jack Smith appeared before the committee with three personal lawyers to support him. The content of the deposition is chilling in the extreme. While many will focus on the granular details of the testimony, I wish to highlight one of the more alarming aspects to the bigger picture.
The predicate for Jack Smith to prosecute President Trump for his efforts to “interfere in the 2020 election” and thereby “challenge all democratic norms” essentially boils down to Jack Smith accusing President Trump of participating in a fraud when he challenged the outcome of the 2020 election.
To get beyond President Trump’s first amendment right to free speech, Jack Smith claims Trump knowingly understood that Joe Biden had won the election; President Trump was told by senior Republican advisors that Biden had legitimately won the 2020 election; President Trump rejected the reality of the “truthful information” presented to him, and instead chose to launch a psychological operation against the American people, i.e. “fraud.”
It is the charge of “fraud” which underpins the entirety of the case against Donald Trump as pursued by Jack Smith. The charge itself is predicated on definitions of what constitutes truthful information, and within that subset of predicate you begin to realize just how important it is to professional leftists that they control information.
The only way Jack Smith could prove fraud would be to prove that President Trump believed the information about Joe Biden winning the election. Smith sought to prove Trump’s belief by presenting Republican voices who told President Trump he lost.
Whether you like or dislike President Trump, the issue here is alarming when contemplated.
A man tells you a chicken is a frog, you laugh. The man then brings 15 of your family members to tell you a chicken is a frog. You reject the absurdity of the premise, but the man brings forth hundreds more people to tell you the chicken is a frog and if you do not accept that Chickens are Frogs, you will be defined as mentally impaired, institutionalized and become a ward of the state.
[Insert any similar metaphor needed, including “what is a woman.”]
When we consider the current state of sociological, societal or government manipulation of information; and/or the need for government to control information (mis-dis-mal-information) as an overlay; you can quickly see where this type of legal predicate can take us. Bizarro world becomes a dystopian nightmare.
Yes, it is also clear that Leftists inside that closed-door committee hearing, are intending to impeach President Trump on these grounds if they successfully win the 2026 midterm election. However, that is not the critical takeaway from this deposition. Instead, the critical takeaway is how the Lawfare construct can be twisted and manipulated to create the legal means to the leftist ends.
Stop the Division!
We cannot allow these communist, Marxist and leftist-minded control agents get back into power.
It’s not about Trump. It’s about us.
I don’t care if you support Donald Trump, Ron DeSantis or the Easter Bunny, any American who doesn’t realize the tenuous future of our union after reviewing this testimony is going to live in a collapsed dystopian nightmare, if they vote for any political representative who supports it.
theconservativetreehouse.com…
DBabe retweeted
⚡️This is a structural kill shot disguised as moderation - not a walk-back.
Trump’s team knew if they slammed existing holders immediately, the courts, corporations, and universities would swarm them with injunctions and sob stories about disruption.
So they carved out the stock, left it untouched, but put a noose around the flow. That’s the actual pipeline that kept Silicon Valley, outsourcing shops, and Indian IT mills running. Kill the flow, the stock ages out, and the model dies in slow motion.
Think of it like choking off oxygen. The body (existing H-1Bs) keeps moving for a while, but without new supply, the system collapses from within.
The real mask-off implication:
•For American labor: This is the first time in decades the cost arbitrage model has been structurally dismantled. Over the next 2–3 years, wages at the bottom tier of STEM jobs will rise, not because of “free markets,” but because the cheap labor conveyor belt is being dismantled.
•For Indian IT giants: Infosys, Wipro, TCS, Cognizant - their stock reactions already show it. Their business model is fundamentally impaired. They can’t win contracts undercutting wages without cheap visa inflows.
•For universities: The H-1B system was a backdoor subsidy to pump STEM enrollments. If the exit pipeline is shut down, the entire higher-ed incentive structure breaks. That’s a slow bleed, but it’s lethal.
•For markets: The knee-jerk calm (“oh, existing holders are safe”) is a misread. This isn’t about the next quarter. It’s about rewiring the labor supply chain. That’s far more radical.
Trump just set a fuse that detonates the 30-year experiment of outsourcing America’s brain. It won’t look explosive at first, it’ll look like a slow policy tweak. But in 12–24 months, it creates a reflexive cascade: higher wages, corporate reshoring pressure, offshoring taxes, universities losing demand, and foreign IT stocks structurally repriced down.
This is asymmetric warfare with a time delay.
DBabe retweeted
General officers love contributing to liberal publications like the New York Times. “We are the media now,” so allow me an unfiltered firsthand response to recent articles:
Recently retired General Patrick Donahoe @PatDonahoeArmy posted on X a Times article he captioned, “We Used to Think the Military Would Stand Up to Trump. We Were Wrong.”
The article, as usual, bashes President Trump and a conservative view of the world. The article believes America should go back to a time when we celebrated the “inspiration from the generals Mark Milley and James Mattis who resisted the uprooting of established military standards in the first Trump term.”
Mattis and Milley… are there two bigger frauds?
Mattis is famous for failing forward while simultaneously selling himself as a great military strategist. We were all so desperate for a leader, we let him fool US. He was unable to critically think and challenge a system desperately needing reform because he derived his validation from that very system. It mirrored his inability to challenge the counter-insurgency beliefs he spewed for years, despite overwhelming evidence of the strategy’s shortcomings. In my opinion, if he disagrees with a current approach, it only validates the approach. And a simple search engine query of General Mattis and the Times underscores the tactics of generals using liberal publications to attack conservatives.
Meanwhile General Milley led the way for military officers to focus on everything but warfighting. Ivy League degrees, global warming, race rage… check. Planning for a military operation… nah. Since Trump 1, Milley knew he needed to plan the withdrawal from Afghanistan. When the decision was finally made to abandon Bagram and use HKIA airfield, guess what, HKIA wasn’t reinforced… AT ALL. Two years in the works. In other words, zero military anticipation or forethought. And we wonder why the flock of generals created by these two are so weak?
In another recent article titled “A Clash Over a Promotion Puts Hegseth at Odds with His Generals,” The New York Times happily communicates the contempt of Army Lieutenant General Douglas Sims, who retired on 1 August.
The Times uses Sims to advance its narrative that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, a highly educated and decorated Army veteran, is unqualified for his position. The article maintains the Secretary of Defense unfairly denied Sims a promotion to four-star general.
Bullshit. Sims epitomizes the rot in the general officer ranks. Allow me to explain a different perspective.
This past May, the Honorable Hegseth directed a special review panel to re-examine evidence in the chaotic withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan in August 2021. I was named the deputy of this task force.
Last month our Special Review Panel met with General Sims and others from the Joint Staff. We asked Sims for help obtaining records relevant to the planning and execution of the Afghanistan withdrawal. Sims replied that he couldn’t cooperate with the investigation because there weren’t any Democrats on the panel. He also felt the review of the Afghanistan withdrawal was unnecessary because others like him had examined the operation during Biden’s administration. “We weren’t just sitting on our hands,” he said. Meanwhile, pages and pages of basic questions, like who specifically gave the order to abandon Bagram Air Base, remains unanswered.
General Sims, a hand-picked protégé of Milley, actually stated that he couldn’t follow orders from political leadership because he didn’t want the military to appear political. Newsflash to all the general officers who seem to be confused on this issue: You work for political leadership. You work for We The People… not the other way around.
By the way, Secretary Hegseth denied General Sims a fourth star prior to my observance of his disobedience. Why, because the Secretary has great instincts. He can sense the self-serving quiet resistance the Times promotes. So what did Sims do when he retired, he leaked information to the Times that the process was unfair. So f’n disappointing… as always.
If any of this needs validated, ask the Marine two star who was also in the room during this conversation. But remember, unlike Sims’s approach, I’m brave enough to put my name on the comments. No anonymous sources here.
After 20 years of failure abroad and disappointment at home, the American people elected a change-agent president who, in turn, appointed a change-agent Secretary of Defense. Secretary Hegseth put the nation on notice when he announced his plan to restore warfighting at the department, rooting out progressive ideas and prioritizing troops’ preparation to fight and win on the battlefield. If it wasn’t painfully clear before, it is now: general officers’ nepotistic closed system is threatened by President Trump and Secretary Hegseth.
National reporters and pundits love to quote the Constitution when condemning the actions of President Trump. And yet, to paraphrase the Constitution, “we the people” demand transparency, lethality, and meritocracy.
We want a military that is ready to execute its mission. We want military leaders who can perform military operations. I was the most apolitical officer you’ve ever known four years ago, but I was reborn through the liberal cancel culture. In fact, so are all my closest friends.
If we really want an apolitical military, perhaps we make all the general officers, despite their political affiliation, demonstrate warfighting proficiency. Head scratch… if that’s in the works… I wonder who is leading the effort?
We Can’t ALL be wrong.
No interviews. Stop asking. Stop texting. Stop emailing. I hate that I spent my Friday night writing this.
DBabe retweeted
To anyone who thinks we should just take the win, I say f*ck that!
Gun owners are always the ones that have to negotiate for our God-given rights, while those we elect stab us in the back and sell us out.
This is not enough! #repeletheNFA
@realDonaldTrump @VP
Republicans caved—again. Instead of removing SBRs, SBSs, AOWs, and suppressors from the NFA, they’re settling for a $0 tax stamp to appease an unelected Democrat bureaucrat.
ammoland.com/2025/06/republi…
DBabe retweeted
I am not a heavy metal music fan … That being shared … I could get behind this song.
Let me know how you feel about it!
FAFO!
DBabe retweeted
Happy Birthday, Marines!
For 249 years we have fought and won our nation's battles with honor, courage, and commitment.
From our storied past to the present, every Marine has played a vital role in shaping our legacy.
DBabe retweeted
The 249th Birthday message dropped, hitting hard on the 20th anniversary of Fallujah — there aren’t many OIF/OEF vets left on active duty.
Can’t wait to stand with my Marines and Sailors at our Ball and feel the energy in the room.
Oorah! 🦅🌎⚓️
DBabe retweeted
I am about to author a truthful, brief, 21-point biography of Kamala Harris. The following statements are objectively and verifiably true. If you are a Democrat, you can decide to hate me for this, but you cannot deny the factual accuracy of what I am about to say:
1. Kamala Harris is the offspring of two foreign-born college professors, and they provided Kamala a prosperous childhood ensconced amidst the Ivory Towers of academia.
2. Kamala Harris’ mother comes from the Indian Brahmin caste, which sits atop India’s horrifically backward and oppressive caste system. Her father comes from a family of wealthy Jamaican slave plantation owners.
3. Kamala Harris’ father was an influential Marxist economist.
4. Kamala Harris spent her formative teen-age years living in Montreal, Canada. At no time in her formative years did Harris ever live what is customarily referred to as “The African-American Experience”; or, for that matter, the American working class experience.
5. Kamala Harris failed the California bar exam.
6. Kamala Harris rose to political prominence in California thanks to the support of a much older, married and influential Democrat pol, Willie Brown, with whom she was having sex while he advanced her career.
7. As California’s Attorney General, Kamala Harris knowingly engaged in numerous unfair and unethical legal practices that wrongfully denied many, many unjustly-incarcerated black men their freedom and liberty.
8. As a Senator from California, Kamala Harris was ranked by many non-partisan political analysts as the most extreme Leftist in the Senate.
9. Running as a Democrat Presidential candidate in 2020, while being incredibly well-funded, Kamala Harris nevertheless polled at the bottom of all major candidates and was one of the very first to withdraw. This was widely perceived to be a function of her unlikeability and her inability to offer cogent campaign positions of substance.
10. Joe Biden explicitly stated that he hired Harris BECAUSE she is a black woman. Thus, it is entirely fair to label her a “DEI hire.”
11. Kamala Harris as Vice President has had an unusually high staff turnover rate exceeding 90%.
12. The media is extremely hard-pressed to recount a single accomplishment of Harris as VP. Quite the opposite, they have white-washed her informal title as “Border Czar” as she failed to do anything to stop the extremely high flow into the USA of illegal immigrants.
13. Prior to becoming the Presidential candidate, Kamala Harris had the lowest VP approval ratings of any VP since Spiro Agnew.
14. Kamala Harris knew that Joe Biden had dementia and was incompetent, and took no actions of any kind to ensure that the USA had a competent President.
15. Kamala Harris, along with Barack Obama and other Democrat luminaries, engaged in some form of extortion to force Joe Biden to step aside as the Democrat Presidential nominee in 2024, so she could assume that mantle herself.
16. Kamala Harris never received a single primary vote in favor of the candidacy she seized from Joe Biden.
17. As the Presidential candidate, Kamala Harris was spurned by most of the Democrat party luminaries to be her VP candidate, and instead she settled for Tim Walz, a VP candidate with an extraordinary amount of negative personal baggage.
18. Kamala Harris has been the Democrat Presidential candidate for approximately six weeks, and has yet to engage in any sort of press interview of any kind.
19. Kamala Harris has never worked in a private business in her adult life.
20. Kamala Harris has stated virtually no campaign positions of any kind, and some major ones that she has stated are exact duplicates of her GOP opponent’s long-standing positions.
21. The most visible components of Kamala Harris’ campaign platform thus far are arguably “brat” and “JOY!”
All of the above is objectively true. These are not opinions, these are facts.
So allow me to summarize the above:
“Kamala Harris is the privileged child of racist immigrant college professors, she has all but no connection to the American working class experience in her formative years, she rose to prominence by having sex with a much older, powerful Democrat politician, as a government lawyer she engaged in corrupt practices that discriminated against black men in prison, as a Senator she was the most extreme Leftist in the Senate, she got chosen as VP because of her skin color and genitalia, as VP she has had no notable accomplishments other than to ignore the advanced dementia of her boss, she used extortion to grab the Presidential nomination for herself, and her campaign currently consists of hiding from the press while having no verifiable campaign platform.”
Vote wisely.
DBabe retweeted
Dear Donald Trump-
The offer is still on the table for having only Veterans as Secret Service (SS) agents.
The budget for the SS is $4 billion.
10,000 Vets x $200k/salary = $2 billion.
If my math is correct, that would leave $2 billion left over.
Perks:
-Veterans would feel sense of gainful employment again and service to the nation.
-We are highly skilled in combat situations and have the ability to react to contact quicker than anyone out there.
-We ALWAYS take the high ground.
-There is no slope too steep to accomplish the mission.
-Mr. Crooks would have never gotten a round off and would have met his maker before that.
Signed,
Many, many eager and willing combat Veterans 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
