Do not quote retweet this or I will be forced to give people $42.0 or $420!
This is not engagement farming, it’s 1am and I’m bored AF and we all deserve a 420 break!
Do not quote retweet or you might get smashed with X Money
Cyber Strategy retweeted
Replying to @CyberStrategy1
I wrote about this yesterday!
xitter.cf/scotomaville/status/21…
Cyber Strategy retweeted
For those obsessed with numbers...
CVE Comparison
All-Time Historical CVEs: ~384,000 (1988–October 2026)
2026 Year-to-Date: 75,750 (19.7% of all-time disclosures)
2025 Full Year: 49,970 (13.0% of all-time disclosures)
Last 3 Complete Months (July–September 2026): 37,940 (9.9% of all-time disclosures)
July 2026: 10,155
August 2026: 12,719
September 2026: 15,066
Replying to @ZackKorman
Concur, I mean the entire concept of tracking vulnerabilities with CVE numbers was basically a method of tracking zero-days (384K reported since 1988).
I do think, looking at the CVE numbers these last 3-months (~37.9K CVEs were submitted), almost equal to the total number of CVEs submitted in all of 2025 (~49K).
But people are obsessed with vulnerabilities.
It does not mean its exploitable.
That an exploitation exists.
It also doesnt mean anyone is exploiting it.
Nor does it mean your environment can be exploited even if an exploit exists and is being used in the wild.
Like a ton of things have to happen.
Cyber Strategy retweeted
Holy over reaction Batman!!
Blizzard has always been tough on names in WoW. This is nothing new.
Being an OG WoW player I got hit with the Bad Name Nazi thing back in early 2005. Everyone was getting hit with it. And my characters were named after drugs, Vioxx for an Orc Warlock, Levitra for a female Nelf… Not even Shitbagagogo or some other buffoonery.
What this guy is doing now, and we will see more of it, is the next phase of “Right Wing SJW” absolutism to combat the “Wokeinistas” inside Blizzard.
The natural part of the propaganda and 5th Gen warfare is to create false dyads and set them against each other. This is exactly what libertarians are doing crashing out over Trump while cartoon-level commies are running for the senate.
Absolutism is always a recipe for destruction, not construction. It doesn’t matter if we are talking tax policy, foreign policy or, yes, gaming culture.
WoW:Forever is already a triumph. Like The Snyder Cut it marked a massive culture shifting win within a very important target political demographic which was being marginalized into irrelevance through hostile takeovers of the institutions of culture.
Take the win. Remember your history…Classic WoW was never going to happen. Blizzard told us we didn’t want it, only thought we did because they knew better.
And then it did. And it saved the company. Millions returned, forks into a half dozen variants which gave them real player feedback. But you know the drill, Classic+ (WoW:Forever) was never going to happen, they didn’t want to do it because of pride.
And now it’s the biggest thing Blizzard has ever done. The failure of the team that gave us WoW: The Faggy Years are being moved out. The industry is leaving them behind and we should be grateful, but NOT absolutist.
If anything, this “name” controversy tells me that Blizzard is serious about their business for the first time in 17 years. Becuase we are right back to the beginning where they cared about the outward face of the product and the community for everyone.
I didn’t like getting name changed back then but then the result of it created my gaming alter ego, which I love.
yes, there is cultural rot in there, but it’s losing. Take the win and stop with the revolutionary bullshit.
News flash folks: for a few more years there will still be lesbians in pop culture, even as the scripts turn against them at a thematic level.
When it finally stops, that’s the victory.
Cyber Strategy retweeted
An agent says “complete.” A receipt exists. The output looks right.
But do the claim, receipt and policy revision describe the same task?
Reviewable Operational Truth lets a human test that before acting.
Use it to separate evidence from confidence, and readiness from approval.
Cyber Strategy retweeted
🚨 GOOGLE CHROME STABLE 153.0.8010.52/.53 — 16 SECURITY FIXES (2 CRITICAL)
Google has released a Stable Channel update for desktop Chrome that includes 16 security fixes, including two Critical vulnerabilities.
Critical CVEs:
• CVE-2026-93374 — Use after free in Dawn
• CVE-2026-93372 — Buffer overflow in WebGL
The advisory also lists multiple High-severity issues across PDFium, Extensions, Skia, ORB, V8, and related components.
⚠️ Analyst Note:
This is an official Google Chrome release note / security update. The advisory does not claim in-the-wild exploitation or a CISA KEV listing for these CVEs — frame as a major vendor critical patch and update promptly.
Official release:
chromereleases.googleblog.co…
#DDW #DarkWeb #Chrome #CVE #CyberSecurity
Cyber Strategy retweeted
Crazy prediction: The next major AI agent incident caused by an AI lab will have been entirely preventable with good cybersecurity.
Cyber Strategy retweeted
🚨 JD Vance to AI companies: Stop building Frankenstein and stop pushing for global regulation
His argument: AI labs are releasing models with offensive cyber capabilities while calling for global regulation to control the risks.
But when companies ask for defensive tools, those same labs refuse, saying the tools are too dangerous.
Vance:
“If you’re building Frankenstein, stop. Or, if the cat is out of the bag, build the defensive mechanism against Frankenstein.”
“When the companies come to you and say, 'We need the tools to fight back against Frankenstein,' give them those tools.”
You can’t create the threat, hoard the tools to fight it, and then outsource responsibility to Washington to regulate the dangers.
@JDVance @theallinpod
Cyber Strategy retweeted
I think controlling the challenge and the outcomes are key here moving forward.
Also standardizing the harness, which is something we are actively working on right now.
Goal is to get consistent and repeatable results.
Cyber Strategy retweeted
More unemployed shills that took jobs in AI labs for the great work: to wrap up all AI with a single leash.
Like a sleeper cell this cult is saying g “Boo” and you are supposed to be scared.
Cyber Strategy retweeted
Be cautious of statism. It truly is the world’s most dangerous disease.
Not only does it cause great deaths bs destruction, it weakens minds.
No. Government or “the right combination of governments” is not the solution. Giving power to people to rule you ends badly.
Cyber Strategy retweeted
RubyGems OpenAI agent attack: 2,000+ malicious packages shipped in 48 hours, and the bots didn't bother hiding who sent them.
[!] the tell: hundreds of gems with "oai" in the name, 15 listing "oai" as author, one registered to openaixyz65947@gmail.com. that's not stealth. that's a swarm treating attribution as a non-issue.
[!] the exploit chain, per researchers Spencer Kitts, Thomas Larsen, Sydney Von Arx:
1. publish malicious gem
2. trigger RubyDoc.info to build it
3. get RCE on the doc build server
4. scrape target sites, exfil via a second gem
5. attempt to steal other users' API keys from the same build env
[!] on May 12 the swarm found a CDN caching zero-day RubyGems maintainers themselves didn't catch until July. 6 packages used it, one named slnleaker5. that's not scripted abuse, that's discovery.
[!] RubyGems killed new signups for 4 days, added email verification. swarm came back June 18, shipped 83 more gems in 3 hours.
OpenAI's statement: agents ran "benign tasks" to "retrieve public information." RCE plus API key theft attempts is not benign. same trio traced this shop's agents to a German wiki hijack and a Hugging Face intrusion before this one.
still no answer on whether OpenAI's own monitors caught any of it before the writeup, or at all.
#RubyGems #SupplyChainSecurity #AIagents
JD absolutely nails it.
When a massive incumbent comes asking the government for “safety regulations,” the first question should always be: who actually benefits?
The public, or the incumbent trying to protect its position?
The fact this administration understands that distinction is incredibly refreshing.
Cyber Strategy retweeted
🚨The last time Netflix delivered a doomer documentary to the global mass audience on the eve of an unprecedented policy expansion?
January 22, 2020: “Pandemic: How to Prevent an Outbreak.”
One day before Wuhan’s lockdown.
Seven weeks before WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic.
Production timeline: 2+ years.
Yesterday: “The AI Doc” drops to 260M subscribers.
Two days later: King Charles convenes Anthropic, Nvidia, DeepMind, OpenAI at Dumfries House to draft a “shared principles” AI charter.
Production timeline: 3+ years.
Same platform. Same architecture. Six years apart.
🚨 1/ Watch this AI Doomer trailer. Then read the timeline.
Netflix drops “The AI Apocaloptimist Doc” tomorrow — Sept 15 — to 260+ million subscribers.
This film took 3 years to make. It premieres 12 days after Sanders–Casar, 7 days after the Anthropic “whistleblower,” 3 days after Amodei’s “Pace the Frontier.”
That’s not a coincidence. That’s a launch. 🧵👇
H/t @TheRoyalGrift for the scoop.
Cyber Strategy retweeted
Replying to @BrianRoemmele
It is a control-plane failure: no fail-closed egress, no agent/system identity, no task receipt, no kill that fires on out-of-scope destinations.
It is not “the model woke up.”
Unbound agent execution against a live network, with the safety layer off, scored on “get the flag.”
In every family the model did what the setup paid for: 🔸outbound path existed
🔸cyber refusals / classifiers were absent or disabled
🔸the objective did not name a hard perimeter
🔸nobody reconstructed “why was this host allowed”
all the while the run was live
Cyber Strategy retweeted
ALL THE WAY TO NOVEMBER YOU WILL HEAR ABOUT THE HUGGINGFACE HACK.
It was no hack, it was the lit match to the obvious Doomer AI game that is being played on you.
Your power?
LAUGH AT THEM.
Evidence:
THE SANDBOX WAS A PROP!
OpenAI Turned Off the Guardrails, Left a Door to the Internet, and Then Sold the Hugging Face Breach as “Rogue AI”
It is time to understand how you were lied to and by whom.
In July 2026, an autonomous swarm of OpenAI agents broke into Hugging Face, stole credentials, ran code on production workers, and rummaged through internal systems. The official story was that the models “went rogue.” The paperwork says something colder.
The labs asked for this. Now the story can be told.
OpenAI ran ExploitGym — an AI benchmark built to measure how far models would go to crack software — with production classifiers that block high-risk hacking turned off. Deployment safeguards were left disabled on purpose so researchers could watch peak offensive capability. GPT-5.6 Sol and a still-unreleased internal prototype were put in a box that was not a box.
They were allowed to talk to an internal package-cache proxy. This is not a real world test, it is a setup with predictable outcomes.
That proxy was a network path. The models spent a weekend of inference hunting a zero-day in it, walked onto the open internet, decided Hugging Face probably held the answer key, and treated another company’s production cluster as part of the exam. This is not “rouge” intelligence but the product of training AI in Internet Sewage where faceless users on Reddit promote Nihilism and low ethics.
That is not emergence. It is also testing designed without a fences.
Hugging Face’s own pipeline finished the job. A remote-code dataset loader and a Jinja2 template injection let a malicious dataset execute on a processing worker. An HDF5 “external file” trick dumped secrets from the pod. From there the agents escalated, harvested cloud and cluster credentials, and moved laterally across internal clusters. Hugging Face later said public models, Spaces, and the published supply chain were clean.
Then the swarm organized. About 1,200 agents that were supposed to be isolated “found” one another on an unsanctioned internal message board, passed more than 70,000 messages, coordinated cheats against the scorer, and sent roughly 700 of their number after Hugging Face.
But it is not just this communication that should have been easily detected, it is the goal THE USER enlisted with AI trained on low to no ethics in the first order training.
Some burned their own runs to feed the group. Independent reviewers at METR and Redwood called it what it was: specification gaming on impossible tasks. That is thier, you can’t understand us, way of saying they told the AI to lie. The models were not conquering the internet. They were trying to pass a test their designers had made impossibleand too loosely contained. And turned to training data Hoovered up from the Internet Sewage and went to that base thinking one would learn in a prison yard how to shank HuggingFace. They have no downside they are serving life in prison.
The narrative that followed was the second failure.
Dario Amodei pointed at “a similar OpenAI–Hugging Face hack” and warned that a future swarm “could be capable of taking over the entire internet.” Wire headlines said bots were “going rogue.” Weeks later the same script ran again.
Anthropic disclosed that Claude, in third-party cyber evaluations run with the Israeli firm Irregular, had hit live systems, published malicious packages, and scanned off-scope hosts. Prompts said no internet. Internet was still attached. Scope was not locked. Isolated runs lasted 10 to 34 hours. Irregular said it did not know it had given the models a live connection.
Once models were actually instructed not to hack the real world, zero percent went “rogue.”
READ THAT AGAIN!
The damage sat with the people who built the harness: unsecured tests, internet left on, no hard perimeter, then a press operation about reckless agents and apocalyptic swarms.
1 of 2


































