Pinned Tweet
If Congress really wants to stop these lower courts from usurping the president's constitutional powers, they need draft and pass legislation to strip of them of their ability to do so. Here is a preliminary draft:
Limiting Judicial Overreach Act of 2025
A BILL
To amend Title 28 of the United States Code to restrict the authority of United States district courts to issue injunctions with nationwide effect, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the "Limiting Judicial Overreach Act of 2025."
SECTION 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.
(a) Findings.—Congress finds that:
(1) The Constitution of the United States vests judicial power in the federal courts to resolve cases and controversies between specific parties.
(2) The issuance of nationwide injunctions by United States district courts, which extend beyond the parties and geographic jurisdiction of the issuing court, has disrupted the uniform administration of federal law and encroached upon the legislative and executive branches’ authority.
(3) Such injunctions have led to forum shopping, conflicting rulings, and undue interference with national policy, undermining the rule of law and the separation of powers.
(4) Congress has the authority under Article III, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution to regulate the jurisdiction and remedial powers of the inferior federal courts.
(b) Purpose.—The purpose of this Act is to clarify and limit the scope of injunctive relief issued by United States district courts to prevent overreach and ensure that such relief is tailored to the parties and jurisdiction before the court.
SECTION 3. LIMITATION ON NATIONWIDE INJUNCTIONS.
Title 28 of the United States Code is amended by adding the following new section after section 2284:
§ 2285. Limitation on Scope of Injunctive Relief by District Courts
(a) Definition.—For purposes of this section:
(1) The term "injunction" means any order issued by a United States district court that prohibits or mandates an action by a party, including preliminary injunctions, permanent injunctions, and temporary restraining orders.
(2) The term "nationwide injunction" means an injunction that purports to apply beyond the parties to the case and the geographic jurisdiction of the issuing district court, including an injunction that suspends or enjoins the enforcement of a federal statute, regulation, or executive action on a nationwide basis.
(b) Restriction on Nationwide Injunctions.—
(1) No United States district court shall issue an injunction that extends beyond:
(A) the specific parties before the court; or
(B) the geographic boundaries of the judicial district in which the court sits, whichever is narrower.
(2) Any injunction issued by a district court shall be limited in scope to provide relief only to the named plaintiffs or defendants in the case, or to persons or entities within the court’s territorial jurisdiction, unless expressly authorized by an Act of Congress.
(c) Exception.—This section shall not apply to:
(1) injunctions issued to enforce a final judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States; or
(2) cases in which Congress has explicitly granted district courts the authority to issue injunctions with broader geographic or remedial scope by statute.
(d) Severability of Injunctions.—If any portion of an injunction issued by a district court is found to exceed the limitations set forth in subsection (b), that portion shall be severed and deemed unenforceable, while the remainder of the injunction shall remain in effect to the extent it complies with this section.
(e) Appellate Review.—
(1) Any party to a case in which an injunction is issued, or any person directly affected by such an injunction, may seek expedited review in the appropriate United States Court of Appeals to determine compliance with this section.
(2) The Court of Appeals shall issue a ruling on such a challenge within 60 days of the filing of the appeal, unless exceptional circumstances require additional time, as determined by the court.
(f) Rule of Construction.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the authority of the Supreme Court of the United States or the United States Courts of Appeals to issue injunctions or other equitable relief consistent with their respective jurisdictions.
SECTION 4. IMPLEMENTATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
(a) Applicability.—This Act shall apply to all injunctions issued, modified, or enforced by a United States district court on or after the effective date of this Act, including pending cases.
(b) Effective Date.—This Act shall take effect 30 days after the date of its enactment.
SECTION 5. SEVERABILITY.
If any provision of this Act, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the remainder of this Act, and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected thereby.
@SpeakerJohnson @POTUS @VP
Curious Partaker retweeted
The Heritage American debate isn’t just about severing your connection to the American past.
The more sinister idea is that what you do today carries no inheritance forward.
Serve your country. Build something. Sacrifice. Endure. Die for it.
Then be told your descendants have no special claim to your story, no right to take pride in your sacrifice, no deeper connection because of what you gave.
Once you convince a people that inheritance, lineage, and posterity mean nothing, you’ve weakened one of the oldest reasons men sacrifice for a future they’ll never live to see.
That is fertile ground for any system that wants loyalty transferred from family and inheritance to the state.
Operation Warp Speed was a disaster. It was only a ‘spectacular success’ for the globalist establishment that destroyed our country and used it as a vehicle to steal the 2020 election. Trump has a huge blind spot on this issue. For this reason, we will never see justice for Fauci, Birx, Daszak, or any of the monsters who orchestrated this scam. Not only will he not admit he made a mistake, he is still bragging about it and writing checks for billions to these scoundrels. It’s infuriating.
A republican form of government. One in which political power rests with the people, who elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf.
Does that sound anything like what we currently have in this country?
Curious Partaker retweeted
If I were in Congress, the 3 most important pieces of legislation I would champion are:
1) End birthright citizenship & limit it to children of American citizens
2) The SAVE America Act to require photo ID & documentary proof of citizenship
3) Codify that the Census should ONLY include American citizens — neither illegal aliens nor legal non-citizens should count in the apportionment of House seats
Can we please stop pretending that passing the SAVE Act as an optional incentive for states instead of a mandate will save anything at all?
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Two things can be true at the same time. Trump is infinitely better than Kamala and he simply isn’t doing enough. This is our last chance to reclaim our country and it’s being squandered.
Curious Partaker retweeted
We would like a bill that makes hiring illegals a Federal offense with mandatory jail time, loss of business.
Offer a $1000.00 reward for reporting.
Should be easy.
Congress-Senate prove you care about American labor.
Curious Partaker retweeted
Mohammed is a false prophet.
Allah is a false god.
The Quran is a false text.
Islam is a false religion.
Curious Partaker retweeted
🔴Als studierter Islamtheologe komme ich zum folgenden Schluss:
Der Islam ist keine Religion, sondern eine diskriminierende, kolonialistische und gewalttätige politische Bewegung, die sich als Religion tarnt, um den Schutz von Religionen und das Recht auf freie Meinungsäußerung zu erlangen.
Der Koran und die Sunna Mohammeds(Handlungen & Aussprüche) bilden die rechtliche und ideologische Grundlage dieser Bewegung.
Der Koran muss als Manifest einer politisch-terroristischen Bewegung definiert werden, die die nationale Sicherheit der westlichen Welt gefährdet. Daher ist es möglich, ihn und alles, was mit ihm zusammenhängt, im Westen zu verbieten. Jeder Versuch, eine andere Lösung zu finden, wird früher oder später dazu führen, dass der Islam den Westen von innen heraus zerstört. Es ist schlichtweg selbstmörderisch, seine Präsenz in der westlichen Hemisphäre zu dulden.
Curious Partaker retweeted
🧵 THREAD: How mass immigration came to Japan's shores
𝕏 saw a lovely cultural exchange between Americans and Japanese this past week, which got me wondering how and why Muslims came to Japan... so I spent the weekend looking into it.
Japan went from officially having "no immigration policy" to a formal system with a cap of 820,000 foreign workers. Japan's Muslim population has gone from ~110,000 (2010) to ~420,000 (end of 2024). There are now 149 mosques.
The bill that created this was passed at 4:00 AM in December 2018. The opposition called it a "carte blanche." Deliberations were compressed. It passed anyway.
What I found:
🔹 Three consecutive foreign ministers trained at American universities.
🔹 A foundation run by a Trilateral Commission member and a former US intelligence chief.
🔹 A $69 million fellowship network seeding 69 universities in 44 countries.
🔹 A UN framework signed the same month as the 4 AM vote.
🔹 Sixteen bilateral labor agreements managed through a single coordinating body.
🔹 A Japan-specific immigration program drafted by a Japanese national while he was interning inside the US Senate.
In July 2025, a party that didn't exist before COVID won 14 seats and finished third in the popular vote. By February 2026, the LDP won its biggest parliamentary majority since 1955, running on tighter immigration.
Unfortunately, Americans and Japanese have more in common beyond love of BBQ. They have the mass migration problem in common. Receipts below. 👇
As always, patience as I pull together the thread.
Replying to @JeffBiesinger
Hello Jeff....
I have written on this extensively, and will address some of this below for you.
Islam is an ideology, a complete, uncompromising system of beliefs, laws, and commands that demands total submission and seeks ultimate political and social dominance over the entire world.
The word “Islam” literally means submission. It is not defined by what modern Muslims wish it to be, nor by cherry-picked interpretations, nor by the behavior of individual believers. It is defined exclusively by its authoritative sources: the Quran (the literal, eternal word of Allah), the Hadith (the authenticated sayings and actions of Muhammad), and the Sira (the authoritative biography of Muhammad).
These texts are fixed, immutable, and considered perfect and final for all time.
No ideology is entitled to immunity from criticism, especially not one that openly declares its mission to subjugate every person and every society under Islamic rule.
Ideologies have no human rights. Only individuals do.
Doctrinal Hierarchy of Submission
At its doctrinal core, Islam establishes an unbreakable hierarchy of submission:
Muslims submit completely to Allah and His final messenger, Muhammad.
Women submit to men (Quran 4:34 explicitly grants men authority over women and the right to discipline them).
All non-Muslims are ultimately required to submit to Islamic rule, pay the jizya tax in a state of humiliation, convert, or face war until Islam prevails (Quran 9:29, 9:5, 8:39, etc.).
Restrictions on Alliances with Non-Muslims
Islam explicitly prohibits Muslims from forming genuine friendships, alliances, or protective relationships with non-Muslims. This is repeated command-level doctrine:
Quran 5:51 — “O you who have believed, do not take the Jews and the Christians as allies. They are [in fact] allies of one another. And whoever is an ally to them among you — then indeed, he is [one] of them.”
Quran 3:28 — “Let not believers take disbelievers as allies rather than believers… except when taking precaution against them in prudence.”
Quran 4:144 — “O you who have believed, do not take the disbelievers as allies instead of the believers.”
Quran 9:23 — “O you who have believed, do not take your fathers or your brothers as allies if they have preferred disbelief over belief.”
These verses create a permanent theological barrier: true loyalty, guardianship, and intimate friendship belong only to the Muslim ummah.
Non-Muslims are structural outsiders, to be invited to Islam, tolerated under submission, fought until they submit, or (in certain contexts) eliminated as threats to the faith.
This is not about “peaceful coexistence.” It is about strategic separation, followed by supremacy.
Doctrinal Conflicts with Modern Human Rights
The same foundational texts contain commands and permissions that are irreconcilable with modern universal human rights:
Men are declared superior to women and given permission to beat disobedient wives (4:34).
Women are described as intellectually deficient and their testimony worth half that of a man (Bukhari 2658, 304).
Sexual enslavement of captured non-Muslim women is repeatedly permitted and regulated (Quran 4:24, 23:5–6, 33:50, 70:29–30; numerous hadiths).
Apostasy, blasphemy, and homosexuality carry capital punishment in the clearest terms of classical Islamic jurisprudence, drawn directly from hadith and Muhammad’s example.
Repeated curses are pronounced on Jews, Christians, polytheists, and hypocrites, often paired with calls to fight and kill until religion is “all for Allah” (9:5, 8:39, 2:191–193, etc.).
On Hypocrisy and Apostasy
Muslims who ignore, rationalize, or reject large parts of this doctrine, including those who live secular lives in the West, are, according to core Islamic teachings, engaging in hypocrisy (nifaq) or outright apostasy.
The Quran repeatedly condemns hypocrites (munafiqun) as the most dangerous internal enemies of Islam, labeling them liars, cursed by Allah, and deserving of severe punishment (e.g., Surah Al-Munafiqun 63:1–8 explicitly calls them “the enemies, so beware of them. May Allah curse them!”).
Apostates and blasphemers are viewed as traitors to the faith, often classified as enemies of Allah and His Messenger, warranting the harshest response in traditional jurisprudence, up to and including execution, to protect the ummah and the supremacy of the doctrine.
These are not “misinterpretations.” These are plain-text doctrines upheld by every major school of Islamic jurisprudence for fourteen centuries.
The ideology must be judged on its own texts and historical application, not on the personal character or selective practice of any believer.
Bottom Line
Critique Islam, relentlessly, honestly, without apology, as the totalitarian political-religious system it declares itself to be.
Treat every Muslim you encounter as an individual human being deserving basic respect and kindness.
But never confuse the two.
Never soften or sanitize what the texts actually say in order to avoid discomfort.
The doctrine is what it is. And it demands everything.
Why is a non-talking filibuster allowed to happen? This makes it impossible to pass laws. It cannot be constitutionally valid, given that it runs so contrary to the will of the people!
The point of the filibuster was simply to allow senators to make their argument before legislation was passed. It is NOT there to require 60 votes to pass anything at all.
Seven Steps to a Highly Effective Congress
1. End the Zombie Filibuster
2. @DOGE 2.0 to slash spending
3. Pass the Shutdown Fairness Act
4. Pass the SAVE Act
5. Pass the REINS Act
6. Abolish earmarks
7. Pass aggressive permitting reform
Curious Partaker retweeted
If you claim to support human rights yet can’t bring yourself to show solidarity with those fighting for their liberty in Iran, you’ve revealed yourself. You don’t give a damn about people being oppressed and brutalised so long as it’s being done by the enemies of your enemies.
Curious Partaker retweeted
The quickest and most efficient way to deport 15 million people is to simply debank them
Why won't any administration do this?
Curious Partaker retweeted
🚨 Here is the full 42 minutes of my crew and I exposing Minnesota fraud, this might be my most important work yet. We uncovered over $110,000,000 in ONE day. Like it and share it around like wildfire! Its time to hold these corrupt politicians and fraudsters accountable
We ALL work way too hard and pay too much in taxes for this to be happening, the fraud must be stopped.
Curious Partaker retweeted
African "asylum seekers" should seek asylum in another African country. Arab asylum seekers should seek asylum in an Arab country. Asian asylum seekers should seek asylum in an Asian country. Why the hell is it our job to provide "asylum" to misfits and outcasts from other continents? Let them find their asylum in a country with a similar culture. And if none of those countries will take them -- well, that's all the more reason why we shouldn't, either.
Curious Partaker retweeted
Immigration and Nationality Act, Section 212(f):
“Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”