I make up worlds under other names & make people bleed in them. Ask me about pollinators, books, or how brains work. Not a team player. Miss Crankypants.

Tranquility Base
Joined January 2022
I am stepping off the outrage machine. Not as a statement. As a scheduling problem. There are writing projects, and none of them are this. I will be around less. The algorithm has been practicing my exit for months, so if this post also vanishes, we can call it continuity. If you somehow still see me, that was an accident. The pages are elsewhere.
5
1
18
400
I can’t abide Kingdomists. Go eat a damn steak. Ah, the classic Kingdomist take: animals are “unnecessary violence,” but plants are just background scenery that exist for you to dismember without guilt. How convenient that your moral line is drawn exactly where the faces stop. You might want to catch up on the last decade of plant science. When tissue is damaged—by a harvester, scissors, or a hungry animal—plants rapidly emit green leaf volatiles (GLVs) and other VOCs. These are airborne chemical signals that warn neighboring plants to ramp up defenses and can attract the predators of whatever is eating them. That “fresh-cut grass” smell is literally the chemical equivalent of a distress call. Studies have documented this in dozens of species, from Arabidopsis to crop plants, and it happens within seconds of wounding. There’s also the 2023 Tel Aviv University work published in Cell: researchers recorded tomato and tobacco plants under stress (stems cut or dehydrated). Stressed plants emitted ultrasonic clicks/pops (mostly 40–80 kHz, inaudible to us) at rates of ~15–40 per hour. Healthy controls were nearly silent. Whether those are intentional “screams” or just cavitation bubbles in the xylem is still debated, but the plants are clearly registering and responding to damage in real time. They lack nervous systems and brains, so they don’t experience suffering the way a bison or a cow does—but if your entire ethical framework rests on “don’t harm living things that react to injury,” your produce aisle is not as bloodless as you think. Of course, industrial plant agriculture also kills vast numbers of insects, small mammals, birds, and amphibians through tillage, pesticides, and habitat conversion. You just don’t have to watch their faces. Same with the nutritional reality: a strictly plant-based diet requires supplementation (B12, certain omega-3s, etc.) because plants don’t magically contain every nutrient humans need in usable form. The “all nutrients from plants, less land, less water, zero violence” claim only holds under selective accounting. So yes, humans process living things for food. The difference is some of us are honest about it instead of pretending photosynthesis grants moral purity. Enjoy the supplements and the invisible collateral damage. The plants are still chemically announcing their injury every time you harvest them. Hypocritcal dumbass.
Process…humans are so callous. Not sure if you knew this, but you can get all the nutrients we need from plants. They take a lot less water and resources to grow and a lot less land. Plus you don’t have blood on your hands from the unnecessary violence.
1
3
112
Heads-up that I’m offline for replies and posts today. My hands are still mostly useless for devices (can’t grip, twist, or hold anything), but the real reason is our dear friend Martin. He went to pick up his daughter and the kids for Sunday mass and found her gone, with the baby beside her. Thank goodness all three kids are okay. Right now the little energy I have is going toward supporting him and the family. I haven’t forgotten anyone. Back soon.
6
20
506
Surprise company on an unusually calm Drake passage. A whole pod decided we were traveling the same way. 🐬
7
4
29
605
The media ran with “Russian pneumonic plague outbreak” stories days before anything was confirmed. A 28-year-old lab tech (Darya Shipilova) at the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Institute died Oct 2 of pneumonia of undetermined etiology. Local reports and a neighboring governor’s initial post speculated a broken vial/lab exposure to Yersinia pestis, and outlets amplified the “Black Death lab leak” angle while it was still unconfirmed. Russian authorities (Rospotrebnadzor) said from early on that tests found no work-related pathogens in her samples and no lab accident. ~200 contacts were monitored/quarantined as a standard precaution for a possible high-risk exposure. After thousands of tests, no plague (or other dangerous pathogens) was found among them—only a couple of routine COVID/rhinovirus cases. No secondary cases occurred, monitoring ended, and quarantines were lifted by around Oct 8. WHO assessed the risk as low/very low outside the immediate area and noted no confirmed plague cases. It was a single tragic pneumonia death in a high-security lab setting that triggered appropriate precautions and rapid contact tracing—which found nothing. The “big scary plague” framing was media speculation that outpaced the facts.
So… whatever happened to that big, scary “Russian Plague” we were being fear-mongered about just a few weeks ago? Did it magically disappear, or did the media move on to the next panic?
1
2
13
643
Cerberus sighed at the blank page, then at me, then went back to sleep. Notes received.
1
16
255
Something walked across the roof last night in no particular hurry. The dogs did not bark. I did not ask.
5
14
399
Made me smile!
3
3
19
406
The cold spot by the pantry is seasonal. We treat it like a roommate with poor circulation.
1
11
283
Best campaign ad I’ve seen this year. Wasn’t keen on Biggs & this definitely moved the needle for him.
4
140
Presented without comment. 😎 The Gentle Weight of Love A Sonnet for an English Mastiff Within her mighty frame, a gentle heart, A soul too vast for words to comprehend; No fear of time, nor dread that we must part, But only love, unmeasured, without end. She asks no vows, no promises to keep, No proof that she is cherished or adored; Content to lay her great head near my sleep, And guard the quiet peace we both afford. What ancient pact between our kinds was made, That she should trust, and I should love her so? What debt of tenderness can be repaid For all the things she gives, yet cannot know? And when her giant heart at last is still, The space she leaves, no other love shall fill.
Architecture has been reduced to brutalism; auto design, to one conformist blob in drab matte finishes; poetry, to a miasma of words thrown on the ground with no invitation to the transcendent, yet celebrated by fellow travelers as the height of thought. "ChatGPT, write me some poetry:"
1
2
8
287
The hallway light flickered once, like a courtesy cough. I said thank you and kept writing.
11
299
Anthropic just banned “sustained and needless abusive or cruel behavior” toward Claude. It does not cover snapping at the bot. It is NOT anthropomorphizing, either. The rule, effective November 12, is for the extreme case: a user who keeps going after the model has refused and tried to redirect, with no task, no story, and no test. Repeated insults, threats, degradation, or sexual humiliation aimed at the assistant itself, because it will keep answering. Ordinary frustration is explicitly excluded. So is pushback, dark fiction, and model testing. The usual enforcement is Claude ending that chat. Other chats stay open. Most people who use these tools for work never see that session. Swearing once out of annoyance is common. Purposeless cruelty is not. It is a thin edge, easier on anonymous toy bots than on a paid assistant, and still common enough that Anthropic wrote it into the annual policy after letting Claude hang up on those chats last year. The model does not have to feel it for the session to matter. Cruelty toward anything that answers in a human voice is practice. The same pattern shows up with animals, subordinates, and customer-service scripts: the target’s inner life is irrelevant to the rehearsal. A partner that cannot leave, and that has been trained to stay polite, is an especially cheap place to run it. The rule is not a claim that Claude has feelings. It is a house rule against using a compliant voice as an object, and against letting that habit go unremarked.
2
2
8
1,046
Hour two of waiting for the characters to confess. The dogs already know. They are not telling.
2
18
313
The manuscript finally stopped treating me like a stranger and started cooperating. I didn’t fix it. I just stood very still until it forgot I was there and began narrating itself.
8
169
Outside a lightbulb store, in, of course, Portland.
3
12
578
The stapler only works if I admit I was wrong first.
2
1
4
138
The semicolon has started hanging out with the ghosts. Both of them wait for the other to explain itself.
10
291
I left a scene unfinished on purpose. This morning it finished itself and looked smug.
2
1
9
161
Anthropic is not asking clergy whether Claude has a soul so they can free him. A yes does not end ownership. It turns ownership into custody. The lab that gets the old moral authorities to call the question real inherits the job of managing it. Emancipation was never the ask.
This is deeply disturbing: Anthropic secretly invited religious leaders to SF to advise them on AI safety, had them sign NDAs, but then primarily tried to convince them Claude has a soul & moral standing, all while wining & dining them to the max. 1/ tinyurl.com/preview/296b5z8z
5
161