ukashat Ibrahim

I took some time to investigate the on-chain activity of $SUNUSI Here’s what I found📌 From my investigation, it appears that the website used by @SunusiMinjibir had a malicious mechanism built into it. The website was programmed so that whenever you tried to burn tokens, it would burn only 0.1% of the amount you intended to destroy, while automatically transferring the remaining 99.9% to another wallet. In the case of $SUNUSI, they attempted to burn more than 242M tokens. However, because of how the website was programmed, only about 242K tokens (0.1%) were actually burned, while the rest was transferred You can verify this directly on-chain. One of the most deceptive parts is that when you click on the transfer transaction on-chain, it redirects you to the burn transaction, making it appear as though the tokens were burned. This was a sophisticated trick, and even experienced people can fall victim to scams like this. I’m not posting this to blindly defend @SunusiMinjibir I’m simply sharing what I found from the on-chain data, which is public and transparent In my opinion, the biggest mistake was telling people to sell. It may have been better to ask holders to stay calm and organize a CTO (Community Takeover) after the hackers were gone. My heart goes out to everyone who lost money in this incident. Based on the on-chain evidence I reviewed, I couldn’t find any indication that @SunusiMinjibir intended to harm holders. The apparent intention was to burn tokens and reduce the circulating supply, but the website’s malicious code prevented that from happening. If anyone disagrees with this conclusion, I encourage them to present on-chain evidence rather than make accusations without proof. I did this research to find the truth, not to take anyone’s side. Finally, I’d like to send my heartfelt support to @SunusiMinjibir and wish him all the best moving forward. ❤️ ✍️ Musa