isam Marouf retweeted
A farmer, tired of rats destroying his crops and stealing his grain, came up with a clever but cruel plan. He threw a dead pig into a deep, abandoned well. Attracted by the smell, nearly 80 rats rushed into the well to feast on the carcass. At first, everything seemed wonderful. There was more than enough food for everyone, and the rats ate until they were satisfied.
But when the food was gone, they discovered something terrifying. The walls of the well were too steep to climb. They were trapped. Days passed, and hunger turned into desperation. Desperation turned into aggression. The rats that had once eaten peacefully beside one another began fighting for survival. Eventually, they began killing and eating each other.
One by one, their numbers dwindled until only a single rat remained. Its eyes were bloodshot, and it had survived by consuming its own kind. Then the farmer returned, lowered a rope into the well, and rescued the last surviving rat. But he didn't save it out of kindness or compassion.
The farmer knew the rat had learned to survive by hunting other rats. When he released it into his fields, it would continue killing its own kind instead of eating his grain. The farmer had turned his enemy into his greatest weapon.
And that is the lesson of divide and conquer. Those who control the trap don't need to fight the battles themselves. They simply create the conditions in which others turn against one another.
The rats believed their enemies were the other rats. They never realized that the true enemy was the farmer who had put them there.
The greatest danger isn't always the enemy standing in front of you. Sometimes it's the one who created the conflict and stands quietly watching you destroy each other.
Before you turn against your neighbor because of their political beliefs, ask yourself who benefits from keeping Americans divided. While we fight each other over Republican and Democrat, we may be overlooking those who profit from the conflict. Perhaps the real question isn't which side you're on, but who built the well—and why they want us fighting at the bottom of it.
isam Marouf retweeted
You think you know the devil? Nah. You've never met an ex-wife or a baby mama on a mission.
Then you'll understand why the DEVIL went to EVE instead of Adam in the garden. He knows they are the same.
When they say hell hath no fury like a woman’s scorned, they were talking about baby mamas and ex wives.
Those women turn into a straight DEMONIC BEINGS. It’s Like something demonic entity entered their body.
You can't talk to them. Can't reason. Can't have one logical conversation. The only people they listen to are the ones gassing up their victim story.
You can be in your bed SLEEPING and police kick your door: "You touched your kids." A straight LIE. Made up out of thin air. And they know it's a lie. They don't care. They will burn your whole life down to win.
That's not hurt. That's EVIL. A different breed of evil.
They don't want co-parenting. They want YOUR MONEY. YOUR LIFE. ALL OF IT. They don't care if you live in your car. Don't care if you can't pay rent. Don't care if you're the father and you actually want to BE there.
Their goal is simple: RUIN YOU.
The harder you fight to see your kids, the harder they fight to destroy you. Courts, cops, lies, child support, restraining orders weapon after weapon.
They'll use the kids as a paycheck and as a weapon at the same time.
And everybody claps for them.
isam Marouf retweeted
Most husbands are not emotionally unavailable.
They’ve simply learned that being honest with their wives often comes with consequences.
Every time they express their feelings, it turns into an argument, criticism, or misunderstanding.
Eventually, they stop explaining themselves, not because they have nothing to say, but because silence has become the safest way to keep peace in their marriage. It’s not worth it.
isam Marouf retweeted
Hey @grok, concise no spin.
What nationality would Jesus be if he was born today in 2026?
Nationality only.
isam Marouf retweeted
Women always say: "A man isn't automatically the leader just because he's a man. Marriage is partnership."
Ok.
FEMALE DOCTORS: You make $300K. There's a loyal, hardworking security guard making $35K ready to marry you tomorrow.
Marry him. Pay the mortgage. Finance his life. Lead the house.
If it's just love and partnership, why does his income disqualify him?
FEMALE MILLIONAIRES: Stop demanding a man on your level. Find a hardworking man making $40K. Build him up. Pay his bills. Give him the lifestyle rich men give their wives every day.
If money doesn't determine worth, practice what you preach.
REGISTERED NURSES: You make $90K. A carpenter makes $65K. He's faithful, responsible, hardworking. Why isn't he enough? Why is the doctor automatically the better catch?
I'll tell you why.
A rich man marrying a poorer woman is normal. No one questions it.
But a successful woman says her husband MUST earn more, and we're supposed to pretend money doesn't affect her attraction?
Stop lying.
YOU CANNOT DEMAND TRADITIONAL MALE RESPONSIBILITY WHILE MOCKING TRADITIONAL MALE AUTHORITY.
You want him to approach, provide, protect, pay, fix, solve, and take the hit when it all fails.
But when he expects more say in a house HE'S financing, suddenly marriage is partnership?
You want equal authority but not equal RESPONSIBILITY .
You want a captain when the ship is sinking, and no captain when it's time to steer.
isam Marouf retweeted
Before you marry any woman, kindly look out for these:
1. Shame. A shameless woman, no matter how beautiful she looks, is not someone you should do life with.
2. Cooking. Marriage has nothing to do with modernization. An adult who does not know how to cook is a disgrace. Now imagine that adult is a woman whose primary duty is to cook. She is a terrible woman.
3. Abortion history. Do not bother asking her because she will not tell you. Check so you don't go childless in marriage. You can get that information from her friends.
4. Her ideology on marriage. If you believe in male leadership, avoid feminists. Many women do not identify as feminists because they know it is terrible, but deep down they are feminists. Listen to them speak.
5. Transparency. When she makes money or you give her money for something, watch how she moves. Does she carry you along or spend however she pleases? Be mindful.
6. Sexual compatibility. Do not listen to what people say about religious doctrine. If she is not a virgin and you are not either, it is best you check.
7. Family pattern. Take your time to go deep into her family without her knowledge. Ask deep questions. Use third parties to extract your information.
8. Respect. No matter how good she is in bed, never marry her if she does not respect you. The woman you marry must be someone who respects you above even her father and mother.
9. Religious compatibility. Do not joke with it. Make sure you marry a woman whose religious views align with yours. You might think it does not matter until the divide starts.
10. Control (You might want to call it lead). Make sure the woman you marry is someone you are able to control. If you say "jump", she should jump, or if she questions you, it should be "Honey, how high should I jump?"
Listen 👂
Above all, love God.
isam Marouf retweeted
These are faces of the coal miners from the 1900s.
These are the "little boys" FEMINISTS tell you were privileged to go to school while girls were OPPRESSED IN home.
THEY NEVER SAW A SCHOOL.
These are 10, 12, 14 year old boys, covered in coal dust, lungs full of black soot, working 14 hours underground so their family doesn't starve to death.
This is what they call "patriarchal privilege."
The right to go to school? They got the mines.
The right to own a credit card? They got a shovel.
The right to buy a house? They got a grave at 25.
These are the men who feminists say had all the power. This is the job they did to pay for their families a job they called "patriarchy."
And what did patriarchy ask of women? Stay home. Cook. Clean. Be safe. Stay alive.
And you called THAT oppression?
So tell me - who is oppressed?
The boy in that line who will be dead in 10 years from black lung?
Or you, home, cooking and cleaning, alive, safe, warm?
You have no idea what oppression is. You were so protected you invented it.
Dumb idiots. You don’t know what oppression is.
isam Marouf retweeted
THE UNITED NATIONS HAS A SERIOUS SEXISM PROBLEM. IT HAS BECOME BIGOTED AND HAS LOST ALL MORAL CREDIBILITY.
In 1945, the United Nations Charter reaffirmed faith in the “equal rights of men and women.”
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights subsequently proclaimed that “all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.”
Eighty-one years later, what happened to that noble commitment?
Research published by Dr James Nuzzo in March 2026 exposes an extraordinary double standard:
♀️ 15 UN-recognised international days dedicated to women and girls.
♂️ ZERO dedicated to men and boys.
Not even International Men's Day, first celebrated in 1999 and marked last year in more than 110 countries...
The UN recognises days for bees, tuna, snow leopards, asteroids and basketball. Yet it cannot formally recognise a single day celebrating half of humanity!!
This isn't an isolated oversight. It reflects a wider institutional culture in which gender equality too often means advocating for females while overlooking the suffering, disadvantages and contributions of males.
Consider the global evidence:
🔹 Men die approximately FIVE YEARS younger than women. While in seven countries, men die over TEN YEARS sooner.
🔹 Around 80% of homicide victims are male.
🔹 Men account for the overwhelming majority of workplace fatalities.
🔹 Male suicide rates are two, three, and sometimes four times those of females.
🔹 UNESCO estimates 140 million boys are out of school.
🔹 Men constitute approximately 93% of the world's prison population.
🔹 Fathers face serious barriers to equal participation in their children's lives.
Where is the comparable international urgency, compassion and institutional commitment?
Why does disadvantage become a gender equality emergency when it affects females, but so often a matter of individual responsibility when it affects males?
The UN has undoubtedly made important contributions to women's rights, humanitarian protection and international development. Those achievements deserve recognition.
But they do not excuse ideological selectivity, institutional double standards or the marginalisation of men and boys.
An organisation claiming to represent all humanity must not become an activist institution advancing one sex's interests while treating the other as a worthless afterthought.
This isn't neutrality. It isn't impartiality. And it's certainly not Genuine Gender Equality.
As Chair of the International Council for Men and Boys, I am proud that our upcoming Global State of Men and Boys Report 2026 examines 12 major disparities affecting males, drawing on evidence from more than 50 countries.
Our approach is straightforward: recognise disadvantage wherever it exists, respect the dignity of every human being, and pursue evidence-based solutions for everyone...
We are also working constructively toward UN recognition of International Men's Day.
The UN should reform its gender institutions, abandon ideological one-sidedness, and restore public confidence through equal compassion, accountability and respect for both sexes.
Supporting men and boys doesn't diminish women and girls, in fact it strengthens families and communities.
Human rights are not a zero-sum game.
The Future is Everyone.
#UnitedNations #GenderEquality #InternationalMensDay #MensRights #HumanRights #MenAndBoys #GenuineGenderEquality #ICMB
@un @menandboysnet
isam Marouf retweeted
Only a WOMAN will go into marriage with NOTHING to her name - no house, no car, no land, no savings, just her suitcase and
makeup - and come out of that same marriage with a CHILD, a CAR, a HOUSE, MONEY, a BUSINESS, and ALIMONY.
Only a MAN will go into marriage with EVERYTHING - his house, his car, his sperm, his money, his business, his future - and
come out of that same marriage with ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. No house. No car. No kids. No peace. Just debt and depression.
And you have the audacity to say "marriage benefits men"?
Tell me how a man benefits when the kids he fed and paid school fees for now call another man "daddy"?
Tell me how a man benefits when the house he built with his own hands is now your "safe space" and he needs a court order to enter it?
Tell me how a man benefits when he loses half his property for a marriage YOU said you didn't want anymore?
She gets the child - He get child support.
She gets the house- he get rent.
She gets the car - he get Uber.
She gets sympathy - he get mocked.
She gets to start a new life with YOUR money - he get to start from ZERO at 50 years old.
If marriage benefits men, why are divorced women richer than divorced men? Why are widows richer than widowers?
MARRIAGE IS A WEALTH TRANSFER FROM MEN TO WOMEN. The biggest legal scam ever created against men.
Ungrateful women.
isam Marouf retweeted
Bible: A husband must love and provide for his wife.
Feminist: Yes!!!!!!!
Bible: A woman must submit to her husband.
Feminist: That's only if he deserves it. He has to earn my respect, submission comes naturally if a woman is treated right.
isam Marouf retweeted
Time for women who make false accusations to be added to the sex-offender registry. Men need to be warned of the risk.
A civil jury ruled in favor of ex-MIT scientist David Sabatini, who was accused by a younger colleague of inappropriate sexual conduct in his Cambridge research lab, and awarded him $6 million in damages. trib.al/s3v9VIX
isam Marouf retweeted
I told my wife I was demoting her to roommate after I found out about her affair
isam Marouf retweeted
US "Here is Starlink, a powerful military technology. We'll give it to you for free and block Russia. Just please don't use it to strike Russian mainland targets. They have, you know, nuclear warheads and stuff, thanks".
Zelensky: Uses it to strike mainland targets.
US "Zel, see above. Also, btw, you may not have noticed, but we have a global oil/energy crisis atm, so can you please, you know, not use Starlink to hit Russian refineries and make things worse, esp with the midterms coming up. Ty".
Zelensky, "nah, I think I will, and especially because the midterms are coming up. Go fuck yourself Trump".
US, ok let's throttle their mainland access so they can't launch offensive strikes.
Zelensky: "Omg I can't understand why the US would possibly do this. The US seems to support the other side."
🇺🇦 Zelenskyy delivers a blunt message to the United States:
“Just give us Starlink back. If you refuse, Ukraine will survive. We will continue defending ourselves with or without it.
But why would you restrict a country fighting for its survival? Why make it harder for us to defend our people?
I simply cannot understand the reasoning behind this decision. It is a mistake.”
Ukraine isn’t asking America to fight its war. It’s asking America not to stand in the way of its defense.
isam Marouf retweeted
This is how you do it guys. Every woman crying MeToo without evidence should be sued. Also, file criminal charges as well. Jail these liars.
Former MIT scientist wins $6M defamation verdict against colleague who accused him of sexual misconduct trib.al/q1cVlXE
isam Marouf retweeted
Pilar Sanders told a court Deion Sanders was worth $250 million. Her prenup capped her at $1 million.
The agreement was signed on April 19, 1999. They married two days later.
The terms: $100,000 for each year of marriage, capped at $1 million. Her own lawyer from 1999 testified she also received a $100,000 "signing bonus" to sign it.
Deion filed for divorce in December 2011, after 12 years and three children.
The court record:
$24,000 a month in payments was what she asked for.
$10,500 a month in child support plus $275,000 for her lawyers was what a judge ordered in May 2012.
The child support was later cut to $2,500, then raised to $4,500.
On October 24, 2012, Judge Ray Wheless ruled she signed the prenup voluntarily and told her lawyers not to bring the claim again.
In March 2013, an arbitrator confirmed both of them signed it.
On March 12, 2013, a jury voted 11 to 1 to give Deion sole conservatorship of their two sons.
Her lawyers said parts of the prenup were forged, two pages were missing, and she signed under pressure. They wanted a handwriting expert to examine the original.
When she put his net worth at $250 million in court, Deion laughed out loud. By then a judge had ordered her to stay 500 yards away from the house she had lived in.
The case for Deion: she signed it, took the $100,000, and a judge and an arbitrator both upheld it. "This is greed. That's all it is," he said at the 2012 hearing. In 2013 he said, "It's not about the kids. It's about the money."
The case for Pilar: 12 years, three children, and a fixed $1 million against a fortune she estimated at $250 million, set two days before the wedding.
In the video below, in April 2012, she says: "I understand that I have very little chance at beating a Hall of Fame, two-sport man that everyone seems to love and adore."
Should a prenup signed two days before the wedding still hold after 12 years and three children?
isam Marouf retweeted
Dr. Dre built an $820 million empire and thought a signed 1996 prenup protected his life’s work.
It didn't stop what became one of the most toxic, scorched-earth divorces Hollywood has ever seen.
Nicole Young didn’t just file for divorce; she went for the jugular. Her legal team challenged the prenup by claiming "duress," demanded an absurd $2 million a month in temporary spousal support, and attempted to subpoena multiple alleged mistresses to interrogate his private finances.
The battle took an immense physical toll. In the dead center of the 18-month legal crossfire in January 2021, Dre suffered a near-fatal brain aneurysm, forced to handle court hearings from an ICU bed while fighting for his life.
In the end, Dre wrote a massive $100 million settlement check just to stop the bleeding and buy his peace.
There was no polite PR statement. No "we remain close friends." The exact week the paperwork cleared in December 2021, Dre posed grinning from ear to ear next to giant silver balloons that literally spelled out "DIVORCED AF."
The clean cut severed all future spousal support, forced Nicole to cover her own multi-million dollar legal fees, and permanently cut ties.
The brutal reality? Most men believe an ironclad prenup makes them bulletproof. This case proves that when the modern legal industrial complex smells blood, a signed piece of paper won't stop the machine.
If a titan worth $820 million with the best lawyers on earth nearly loses his life and still has to pay nine figures to walk out the door, the court system isn't protecting marriage, it's running an extraction racket.
isam Marouf retweeted
In der Ukraine musste ein armer Mann seinen Hund mehrfach nach Angriffen an verschiedenen Orten "retten".
Gott sei Dank waren immer Kameras vor Ort und die Bilder gingen um die Welt.
Blöd, dass das jetzt aufgefallen ist!
Die Macht der Propaganda-Bilder:
isam Marouf retweeted
Make the false accuser famous.
A civil jury ruled in favor of ex-MIT scientist David Sabatini, who was accused by a younger colleague of inappropriate sexual conduct in his Cambridge research lab, and awarded him $6 million in damages. trib.al/s3v9VIX