$EDEL next leg is to multiple 9 figs imo. $200-300m then let some people off the bus and push to 1 EDEL = $1 I'm sure we will see more ppl like this top blasting then selling with emotion at a loss. None of this is financial advice, but I have been buying from public wallets, will live or die by the sword - but won't be selling this position under $100m.

Genuine on-chain research differs significantly from engagement farming. Unfortunately, @bubblemaps seems increasingly interested in the latter. The irony? Frank had already sold his $EDEL, exited other positions and opened leveraged shorts before this narrative resurfaced. Love or hate him, @frankdegods is one of, if not the best, realised PnL traders; he doesn't take backhand deals, so he can stay agile and unencumbered. This is factual. Bubblemaps, you failed again, the information was already outdated before the tweet went live. Let's discuss some actual fundamentals. • Nearly 40% of $EDEL supply remains outside circulation, including publicly disclosed allocations. The team voluntarily relocked its tokens in March for another 12 months, 10% locked to ensure 1:1 $EDEL:$EDELx on @CantonNetwork, nearly $4m in liquidity across @base, @RobinhoodCrypto, @Solana, and as mentioned Canton. • Presale tokens are 100% vested, with most participants having already exited. • Edel is generating $10K–$50K in daily revenue(public), supporting token buybacks(undefined for the minute) and building a sustainable runway without relying on treasury token sales. • When the xStocks $GOOG pricing discrepancy occurred and there was an exploit, the affected Edel users were made whole. • Edel continues building institutional-grade infrastructure across tokenisation, credit and derivatives on Canton and Base. As someone who has engaged with the team on and off since before TGE, I've seen firsthand the maturity of the product, the depth of thought behind its usability and sustainability, and most importantly, the team's willingness to evolve and pivot towards genuine revenue generation. That last point is something the industry doesn't give nearly enough credit to. Web3 was supposed to be about democratising finance. Broader access, equal opportunity and financial infrastructure that doesn't exclusively benefit the institutions controlling it. Edel is actually working towards that vision, while building a business capable of sustaining itself. Catching up with the CEO in Singapore only reinforced my conviction. Being privy to some of the conversations and interactions with major institutional players and supporters across the Canton and Base ecosystem gave me an even greater appreciation for the scale of what they're building. These are the conversations that matter. Not recycled wallet diagrams designed to generate impressions. As @TraderSZ highlighted, context matters. Historical wallet activity without consideration for current supply dynamics, revenue, product development or institutional relationships is an incomplete picture at best. What I find particularly interesting is the motivation. In an industry overflowing with projects generating zero revenue, endless emissions and little more than promises, why repeatedly target one of the few sub-$100M Web3 companies actually generating meaningful revenue and reinvesting it into its ecosystem? I'm all for accountability. Teams should be scrutinised, token movements questioned and claims independently verified. But scrutiny without context isn't research. And recycling old narratives while ignoring material developments isn't protecting investors. There's a difference between understanding a blockchain transaction and understanding the business behind it. One takes a few clicks. The other requires actual due diligence.