Crypto Winkle retweeted
I spoke with @bajpaiharsh244 from @Zcash about what it will take to make shielded payments practical for everyday use.
We discussed the work toward faster payments, the potential for businesses to build payroll, merchant payments and private stablecoins on zcash:native, and what it would take to move beyond being a place to hold funds to a place to spend them.
We also discussed Zcash’s plans for quantum-resistant cryptography👇
Crypto Winkle retweeted
Ethereum has spent its first decade proving that a decentralized network can operate at global scale.
I asked @ethereumJoseph what he thinks the next decade is really about, and what @ethereum needs to become as adoption expands beyond the crypto industry👇
Finished a short session with @ethereumJoseph🔥
video dropping soon 🔻
Crypto Winkle retweeted
I spoke with @EliBenSasson from @Starknet about quantum resistance, Ethereum’s shift toward proof-based verification, and Starknet’s potential role in connecting Bitcoin and Ethereum.
We also discussed private payments on smartphones and how STARK proofs could help verify AI computations as agents begin handling real transactions👇
Finished a good session with @EliBenSasson from @Starknet
Video dropping soon❤️
Crypto Winkle retweeted
I sat down with @wellsda2 CEO of @OndoPerps to discuss where financial markets could be heading as trading moves increasingly onchain.
We covered the implications of 24/7 markets, onchain derivatives, liquidity and leverage.
A few questions I explored:
> Could “market hours” eventually disappear for global investors?
> Could perpetual markets become a primary way to express views on traditional assets?
> What happens when trading collateral itself can generate yield?
> And could 24/7 derivatives become an important source of price information before traditional markets even open?
We also discussed what still needs to be solved before onchain derivatives can support the scale and sophistication of major institutional markets.
A look at how the architecture of financial markets could evolve 👇 – at Singapore
Crypto Winkle retweeted
List of services worldwide that had 0 downtime since inception
1. Ethereum
End of list.
Crypto Winkle retweeted
Companies should integrate @selfxyz for KYCs.
It is safe and keeps everything secure.
Time for web2 to integrate web3 tech🫡
‼️ BREAKING: Revolut handed over customers’ passport copies, verification selfies and full transaction histories to a malicious actor.
The actor sent lawful government information-demand emails using a genuine government domain that passed domain authentication.
Revolut later concluded they were not authentic.
Affected customers were notified on Friday. What may have been disclosed ranges from name, date of birth and home address to account statements, withdrawal records and complete Bitcoin transaction history.
The company says it has alerted the agency to the unauthorised mailbox on its domain, blocked the address and begun notifying regulators.
It has not named the agency, explained how someone obtained a mailbox there, or given a number of affected customers.
ZachXBT, who circulated the notices, believes the incident was limited in size and aimed at high-net-worth users.
Crypto Winkle retweeted
🚨Starting a new series!
Ethereum: The Settlement Singularity.
Ten pieces walking through what @Ethereum is actually being rebuilt into, one part of the roadmap at a time.
Every video covers a real mechanism and shows how it works and why it matters!
Soon🔥
Crypto Winkle retweeted
Glamsterdam targets L1 throughput across three consecutive layers.
> ePBS (EIP-7732) moves block building into the protocol. Validators stop trusting off-chain relays and pick directly from builder bids submitted at the protocol level.
> BALs (EIP-7928) enforce access lists at the block level so transactions can execute in parallel instead of one at a time. The builder declares every address and storage slot touched, and clients use that map to parallelize execution.
> Gas repricings (EIP-7981 & EIP-8037) close data and state growth exploits. EIP-7981 prices access list data at 64 gas per byte, killing the old EIP-2930 block size exploit and making transaction-level access lists economically obsolete once BALs exist. EIP-8037 raises state creation costs so higher gas limits don’t cause runaway state growth.
ePBS and BALs each stand on their own.
Only when these three are improved together can ethereum:native credibly target a much higher gas limit(aligned on a ~200M floor post-Glamsterdam) without compromising verification speed, node requirements, or long-term state growth.
🤖 Made with AI
Ethereum Part 7: Why does $Eth have two upgrades in 2026.
+ Glamsterdam > performance (parallel execution & enshrined PBS)
• Hegota > decentralization (Verkle & stateless clients)
Learn more⬇️
Crypto Winkle retweeted
ETH L2 ecosystem 30 transaction count heat Check🔥
> @base: 11.60M txns (+94%)
> @arbitrum: 1.50M txns (+59%)
> @unichain: 989.85k txns (+53%)
> @Ronin_Network: 207.52k txns (+38%)
> @Starknet: 266.36k txns (+35%)
> @world_chain_: 1.20M txns (+19%)
> @Optimism: 1.42M txns (+18%)
> @plumenetwork: 218.07k txns (+8.0%)
Crypto Winkle retweeted
0/ Glamsterdam’s two headliners (ePBS & Block-Level Access Lists) are getting all the attention.
What’s underrated?
Eight other EIPs scheduled for inclusion in the upgrade.
Here’s what’s broken today and how each one fixes it 👇
Crypto Winkle retweeted
This is one of the reasons why exchange listings are no longer exciting or bullish!
Still most holders wants their tokens to get listed on an exchanges but that also means, it is the top for 75% of the tokens!
Are we just looking for exit liquidity?
How much would you lose if you bought a newly listed token on the top 10 exchanges in the past 1 year(median loss):
Exchanges had 2,558 listings, the median token is down from its listing price on every single one.
> Coinbase, 122 listings with a median loss of 51%
> OKX, 56 listings with a median loss of 51%
> MEXC, 888 listings with a median loss of 64%
> Bybit, 120 listings with a median loss of 66%
> Kraken, 272 listings with a median loss of 66%
> Bitget, 232 listings with a median loss of 71%
> Crypto com, 71 listings with a median loss of 73%
> Binance, 81 listings with a median loss of 74%
> Gate, 423 listings with a median loss of 75%
> KuCoin, 293 listings with a median loss of 80%
No exchange in the dataset breaks a 25% positive listing rate.
A total of 511 positive listings have been made across 2558 listings.
On the best performing exchange, 3 out of 4 listed tokens are still below their listing price.
The data covers median outcomes only. Individual tokens vary significantly in both directions.
Utility tokens finally living up to their name.
@Weaver_Labs token as functional infrastructure mechanism, not speculative asset:
- Enables transparent 5G infrastructure sharing
- Coordinates distributed network participation
- Rewards infrastructure contribution fairly
- Powers ecosystem without being the product
The difference: token serving infrastructure vs infrastructure serving token.
Function over speculation!
$CROSS is moving on volume, not headlines.
@CROSS_gamechain up ~14% to ~$0.124 while the broader market stays flat, with activity picking up again.
- 24h volume +35% to ~$8M → clear spike in participation
- No major catalyst, looks like positioning + rotation
- Mainnet 2.0 (“Breakpoint”) introduces fee burns + new token model
- Ongoing DEX / Forge updates tightening the ecosystem
- $10M treasury allocation from NEXUS adds some institutional signal
This kind of move usually comes down to one thing, whether volume sustains.
- If it does, continuation is likely.
- If not, these rallies tend to fade just as fast.
NFA.
Tokenized real estate is easy to pitch, harder to structure properly. @OneAsset_io is taking the slower route.
Building a compliance-first stack for onchain CRE, not just issuing tokens.
- Fractional ownership of income-generating properties via $USDC
- Daily rental yield paid directly to wallets
- Each asset sits in its own onchain vault (full transparency)
- Built on Base, with non-custodial ownership model
- Focus on legal wrappers + enforceability, not speed
Still early:
- Invite-only pilot live (whitelist cohorts filling)
- No public TVL yet, mainnet targeted for Q3 2026
- $OAT token comes later (governance + incentives)
Most RWA projects start with liquidity and figure out compliance later. Here it’s the opposite, asset quality and structure come first, distribution follows.
Not all stablecoins are actually stable
UST wiped $40B in 2022. Most people assumed "stablecoin = safe" without checking what backs it.
Three types, three risk levels:
1. Fiat-backed (USDT, USDC) - custodial reserves
2. Crypto-backed (DAI) - overcollateralized
3. Algorithmic (UST) - failed, no collateral
What people miss:
- Is it 1:1 backed?
- Can you redeem during panic?
- Liquidity differs across chains
@RangoExchange routes across stablecoins and chains - understanding backing matters when moving value. Check collateral before assuming stability.
Stablecoins aren’t “set and forget”!
Even in DeFi’s safest layer, risk exists: from depegs and liquidity shocks to collateral and issuer exposure🧐
For new users, understanding this is critical:
• Not all stablecoins are backed the same
• Liquidity can shift fast across chains
• Volatility isn’t always price, it’s trust, access, and redemption
In a multi-chain world, safety isn’t just what you hold, it’s how you manage it🛡️
Check out the article below to stay informed on the mechanics of stablecoins, risks, benefits and the future ahead👇
rango.exchange/learn/crypto-…
Infrastructure participation was impossible when coordination cost more than the value created.
@Weaver_Labs Cell-Stack changed the economics: software coordination costs → near zero, community contribution value → measurable and rewarded.
DePIN telecom isn't replacing operators, it's expanding who can build infrastructure.
Monopolies fall when barriers fall!
Telecommunications infrastructure has been the exclusive domain of large operators built in isolation, monetised in silos, and closed to community participation.
The next generation of connectivity will be decentralised, participatory, and rewarding for those who build it. Through CellStack, we are operationalising that premise, creating a system where coverage, capacity, and resources contributed by the community translate into real, tangible rewards.
This is not a distant vision. It is what we are building today
RWAs are starting to plug directly into stablecoin liquidity, @falconfinance is leaning into that.
Latest updates are pushing it forward:
- TSLAon (tokenized @Tesla via @OndoFinance) now live as collateral
- ~$1.6B+ TVL, USDf supply already ~$1.6B
- Expanding beyond crypto → Treasuries, credit, tokenized equities
- sUSDf yields staying competitive (~6–10% range)
- $50M ecosystem fund backing more RWA integrations
Under the hood, the model is simple:
- Mint USDf against high-quality collateral (overcollateralized)
- Stake into sUSDf for yield via diversified strategies
- Unlock liquidity without selling the underlying asset
The interesting part is collateral quality improving, not just growing. Execution matters here but direction is clear as more RWAs move onchain.
New L1s launching with aggregation from day one changes the cold start problem.
@Plasma went live with @RangoExchange integration immediately - no waiting for bridge support.
- Stablecoin-focused L1 with lower fees, faster finality
- Users access Plasma from 70+ chains at launch
- Plasma users tap cross-chain liquidity without waiting
The shift: chains used to spend months isolated, begging for integrations. Now they plug into proven infrastructure and get instant distribution.
When launching with liquidity access beats launching fast, infrastructure timing becomes competitive advantage.
Plasma is supported on Rango💙🔄
A high-performance environment L1 designed for scalable execution and purpose-built for global stablecoin payments bringing:
• Lower fees
• Faster finality
• High-throughput transactions
• EVM compatibility for seamless integrations
What this unlocks:
For users → cheaper, faster cross-chain swaps into and out of @Plasma
For builders → immediate optimal secure access to aggregated liquidity across chains via Rango
As new execution layers like Plasma emerge, liquidity fragments further.
Rango unifies it, routing value where it needs to go efficiently!























