The problem is not pow registration. It's Null Consensus. This is the culmination of the unresolved Validator weight-copying problem. Whether const mines or not i dont even care because even if he says he doesnt, nobody can prove it. Null Consensus means Yuma Consens is not useful all the time and that the purpose of Validators is not as relevant as it should. It's admitting that the incentive system is flawed at the validation level and that it needs to be bypassed in some cases. So Yuma Consensus, which was the moat of Bittensor because it was meant to make products trustless and miner scoring fair, is now openly declared irrelevant on-demand. Why do you think there are even big entities using the Yuma name in their brand? because it was a central aspect that made Bittensor uniquely positioned to be a legit decentralized network where proof of useful work is verified mathematically instead of using trust me bro. With this admission comes eTao next which will allow subnet owners to make the emissions split different than 41% valis / 41% miners / 18% subnet owners... yeah i fucking hope the subnets with no validator purpose will reduce the 41% sent for validators, no shit Im tired of all these wild swings that look like yolo decisions to test results in production Nobody can say anything really, it just happens and we must adapt. Fair. But this isn't a 1000-year decentralized federation lol This is a cool database that Const can shut down when he wants, with ponzi-like micro companies within a niche of another niche (crypto)

The last Bittensor decentralized training algo that pumped $TAO to 350$ was worse than Parallax and its founder was motivated by greed (exited to cash out 10m $) Parallax is better on every levels and @jon_durbin is doing it for his kids future Not the same kind of pump ahead of us