Bitcoin did exactly what I projected in April's post.
The concern now is the thin volume behind this rally; it's driven more by a lack of sellers than genuine demand, which isn't ideal for a sustainable trend.
Closing positions. Safest bet, regardless if a reset comes or not.
Previous high became support. 50-week SMA held. Price approaching ATHs.
I speak. Price listens.
This is one of the most interesting patterns I've seen in a while.
Over the past 3 years, Bitcoin has been consistently turning previous highs into support. These support levels also happen to coincide with the 50-week SMA, a key long-term trend indicator.
That structure is being tested now; maintaining it means a revisit of ATHs, at the very least.
This is one of the most interesting patterns I've seen in a while.
Over the past 3 years, Bitcoin has been consistently turning previous highs into support. These support levels also happen to coincide with the 50-week SMA, a key long-term trend indicator.
That structure is being tested now; maintaining it means a revisit of ATHs, at the very least.
We are NOT early in the bull market.
We've moved beyond the mid-phase and are now nearing the late stage of the run.
Every market cycle wraps up with a blow-off top; altcoins follow 2-4 weeks after #Bitcoin.
130-170k is achievable.
Replying to @sneako
Hitler saw Christianity as meek and flabby, going as far as to say that it was Germany's misfortune to have inherited the wrong religion.
He said that Islam was a strong martial religion, better suited to the Germanic temperament.
He knew that Islam was superior, but Christianity was already deeply entrenched in German society; converting the masses in the midst of a world war was not a feasible option.
Replying to @sikel777 @ZoomerHistorian
The article you posted is describing her on their own behalf.
She defines herself as a "Muslim and agnostic", an oxymoron that contradicts the basic principles of Islam.
Just as there cannot be a squared circle, there cannot be an agnostic Muslim.
Replying to @Partisangirl @owenjonesjourno
Hamas openly rejected Assad and backed the Syrian revolution. By your own logic, you'd also brand Hamas as "supporters of Zionism".
Assad and Netanyahu are two sides of the same coin. You can't condemn one without the other unless you're a hypocrite being selectively outraged.
Replying to @LibyaLiberty
The key difference here is that the extracted texts faithfully represent the original source material.
The Talmud unambiguously calls for the killing of gentiles, and Jewish clergy are using these commands as a decree for Jewish combatants to enact them against Palestinians.










