Pinned Tweet
CRICH is live on Cardano mainnet.
Bare-metal block producer with ECC memory.
Relays on two continents, EU and US.
Cold keys kept offline.
Fixed fee 170 ADA (the protocol minimum), 0% margin.
About 600K ADA of operator stake delegated.
First blocks possible from epoch 665 (Oct 31, 21:45 UTC).
Pool ID
pool1ezmnjmu9fw36ftprczhwhvqd60syaclpp74keu0yj7rty7r3dna
진짜 조심할 건 새 나간 정보로 거래소·증권사인 척 접근하는 2차 피해임.🙏🙏
빗썸·대신증권·미래에셋운용 해킹 총정리(feat. 거래소에 둔 내 코인은?) (출처 : 크립토 리치 | 네이버 블로그) m.blog.naver.com/joseph_suan…
The 9.6M ADA PFMS proposal (a police evidence system in India, built on Cardano) looks like a tech question. It's really a sales question. Here's my reasoning, and why I'd want my DRep to vote No.
What the law requires
• Police in India keep case evidence as files. Under India's new criminal laws, in force since July 2024, electronic evidence submitted to court must come with a certificate that includes its hash value: a digital fingerprint showing the file is the original.
• That's the opening PFMS is built for. It stamps those fingerprints on Cardano.
But a blockchain isn't the only answer
• I can't find a single Indian court ruling that accepts a hash on a public blockchain as that proof.
• The government already has its own tool. e-Sakshya is the official evidence app that India's Home Minister launched in August 2024 for the new criminal laws. Police record evidence in it, and it's kept on a government evidence server that courts can access.
• The 54-page proposal doesn't mention e-Sakshya once.
Spending 9.6M ADA on this? Fine. Paying for it from the treasury? For the sake of argument, fine too.
The problem is how the money is supposed to come back.
How the money comes back
• The only revenue is paid verification. A lawyer or a prosecutor pays to check a record, from $1.89 per request, and 70% goes to the treasury.
Now run the numbers
• Say 100,000 police case files get stamped on Cardano.
• Say 10,000 of them end up contested in court, through victims' challenges and other disputes.
• Say 1,000 of those turn on whether the evidence is genuine, so a lawyer or a prosecutor wants it checked.
• Most of those 1,000 will use the government's own system, e-Sakshya.
How many will treat the hash on Cardano as the only way to settle it?
For that number to be large, three things have to be true
1. Trust in the existing government system is close to zero across the country.
2. No working habits or vested interests keep police, lawyers and courts on that system.
3. Courts accept the hash on Cardano as verified proof.
So the real question isn't whether Trivolve Tech can build it. It's whether Trivolve can sell it to India's legal world: courts, prosecutors and defence lawyers.
The proposal has no plan for that, and I don't see that capability.
Build it, by all means. Just not on the Cardano treasury's budget.
Your ADA doesn't vote on this. Your DRep does. Voting closes Nov 20.
We’re in a position where we’d be spending 9.6M $ADA on a proposal that doesn't bring in users or liquidity, doesn't directly add to network volume, and doesn't improve the developer experience for builders.
Put simply, a project that records police evidence for one Indian state benefits that state's public agencies more than the Cardano ecosystem.
If that's the case, those agencies should be the ones paying for it.
I think that 9.6M ADA could go somewhere far more valuable for Cardano.
We should be focusing on projects that create a positive cycle: new products get built, users and liquidity come in, that activity refills the treasury, and the treasury gets reinvested in the next wave of growth.
Charles is building a new programming language for Cardano.
What would actually change for you as an ADA holder? Here's the full picture, from what you'd tap to what happens behind the screen.
First, what it is (and isn't)
• A language, not an app. You'll never use it directly, the same way you never "use HTML". You use websites built with it.
• Developers will write Cardano apps in it, like they use Aiken or Plutus today.
• Not AI "type in English, get code." It's built around two ideas: intents and zero-knowledge proofs.
• No name, code or release date yet. Charles says it runs on Cardano as it is today. No hard fork needed.
Who does what
• The language: the rulebook. "This ADA can only leave if the user gets at least 2,000 X within 10 minutes."
• Apps: wallets and DEXs (Lace, Eternl, VESPR, Minswap...) could build new screens with it.
• Solvers: independent operators who compete to fill your order.
• You: you keep using the app you already use.
Example 1: swapping ADA for a token
Today
1. Open a DEX like Minswap, pick the pair.
2. Set slippage and sign.
3. Your order waits for that DEX's batcher.
4. If the price moves past your slippage, it isn't filled. You cancel and retry.
With intents
1. Open the same wallet or DEX, once it adds intent-based swaps.
2. Fill in three fields: what you give (1,000 ADA), the minimum you want (2,000 X), how long the offer stays open (10 min).
3. Tap Swap. Your wallet signs that order, not one fixed route.
4. Solvers compete to fill it from any liquidity on Cardano. The best one sends you the tokens.
5. If nobody fills it in time, it expires and you keep your ADA.
You decide the outcome. The app finds the route.
Example 2: proving things without exposing yourself
Today
To use a KYC'd or region-restricted service, you upload your ID to each app. And once your wallet is linked to you, anyone can read your full history.
With zero-knowledge proofs
1. Get verified once. Your wallet stores the credential.
2. When an app asks "are you eligible?", tap Prove.
3. The app sees only the answer, like "verified, not in a restricted country" or "holds 10,000+ ADA". Not your name, balance or wallet.
Isn't this already a thing elsewhere?
Partly. That's what makes it interesting.
• Ethereum: intent swaps like UniswapX and CoW Swap are widely used, but as add-ons. ZK apps use separate languages (like Noir on Aztec).
• Solana: can verify the same type of proof (Groth16), but intents and privacy are built app by app in Rust.
• Anoma: built around intents and privacy with its own language (Juvix). Live on Ethereum via an adapter since Nov 2025, still little usage.
• Midnight: has its own privacy language, Compact, for the Midnight chain.
• ADA already swaps through NEAR Intents (since Sept 2025), but on NEAR's network, not inside Cardano apps.
What's different: one language for both ideas, native to Cardano's main chain, using features Cardano already has. And Cardano's transaction model already works on "only if these conditions are met". That's basically what an intent is.
What holders could see
• Swaps that work like limit orders across all of Cardano.
• One signature for multi-step actions, like swap then stake or lend.
• Compliant products (RWA, institutional DeFi) without handing over your wallet history.
• Airdrop and governance eligibility checks that don't expose who you are.
None of this is live yet. The point is the direction: the chain already supports it, the language gives builders the tools, and the apps you already use are where you'd see it.
Asked Charles whether his new language needs new ledger rules.
Answer: no. The last hard fork already gave Cardano what it needs.
My read: the bottleneck is no longer the chain. It's tooling and execution cost.
Midnight plans to open block production to Cardano stake pools in Q1 2027.
For delegators, the interesting part: it's the ADA delegation that counts. You don't need to hold NIGHT.
I plan to register CRICH the day it opens. No promises on NIGHT amounts until the rules are published.
What does it take to make privacy practical onchain?
The Midnight roadmap breaks it down across 7 areas of work, from confidential finance and digital identity to cross-chain development and next-generation proving infrastructure.
Here's a deeper dive 🧵👇
midnight.network/roadmap
More at crich.io
I'll never DM you first, and I'll never ask for your recovery phrase or ask you to connect your wallet anywhere.
지난 3월 SEC가 ADA를 비롯 디지털자산을 상품으로 분류한다는 '해석'을 내놓았는데, 8월에 공식적 법효력을 갖는 규칙안을 제정하겠다며 초안을 발표했습니당. SEC는 10.20일까지 의견접수를 받고 이를 반영하여 내년에 공표할 예정인 듯한데요, 근데 그 초안에는 어떤 코인이 상품이다. 라는 기준은 없고, 각주로 "지난 3월 해석 참조" 이런 식으로만 들어가있던게 다였어서, 이번에 스텔라, 헤데라, 앱토스, 아발란체, 카르다노, 체인링크 6개 재단이 함께 공동의견서를 제출했다 합니다. (해석서를 그대로 규칙제정 본문에 넣어달라)
PS 재단이 왠일이지. ㅎㅎ
.@chainlink is proud to partner with @hedera, @Aptos, @AvaLabs, and @StellarOrg in urging the SEC to codify its digital commodity framework.
Builders need lasting certainty. Codifying this progress would be a meaningful step toward keeping America the home of digital asset innovation.
H/t @jackson_mueller for leading this effort 🫡
이말이 갖는 의미가 이미 판세가 넘어왔다고 봅니다. ㅎㅎ
이런 말까지 했는데, "의견 들어봤더니 내가 맞아"라고 하기 더 어려워진거죠. 둘러 표현한겁니당.
톡방에서 누차 말씀드려왔습니다. 우리는 행정기관 관료의 입장을 생각해야하고 휘둘리지말자고. 장담할 순없지만 느낌상 그렇습니다.
CryptoRich | CRICH retweeted
Midnight 🤝 @dynamic_xyz, a @FireblocksHQ company
Dynamic has integrated Midnight across its non-custodial wallet infrastructure, making it easier to access Midnight apps through embedded wallets created with email or social login.
With “Login with Midnight” and support for external Midnight wallets, users can go from an email address to a shielded transaction without installing additional software.
And this is for the wider ecosystem, not just @midnightfdn projects. Teams already using Dynamic across EVM, Solana, Bitcoin, Stellar, Sui, TON and Aleo can add Midnight through their existing integration. Dynamic will maintain support as the network evolves, with documentation, tooling and implementation guides for builders.
Midnight is the first privacy-preserving blockchain supported by Dynamic, and early-stage projects can access Dynamic free for up to 10,000 monthly active users. 👏
Easier ways to build.
Fewer barriers to access.
Privacy built into the experience.
카르다노 에이다에서 2023년 사업계획서를 통해 발표된 고속도로 공사가 잘 진척되고 있습니당.
그때 전망했던 우로보로스 레이오스에 대한 디테일, 프리뷰입니당.
카르다노 에이다 근황과 전망(feat. 레이오스) (출처 : 크립토 리치 | 네이버 블로그) m.blog.naver.com/joseph_suan…
투자여정의 핵심은 '변화하는 시대를 읽는 감'입니다.
이 시대의 하(下)남자 유형을 짧게 정리해봅니다.
이 시대의 하남자 유형 정리(feat. 상남자가 투자도 잘하더라) (출처 : 크립토 리치 | 네이버 블로그) m.blog.naver.com/joseph_suan…
100년 기술이란 관점에서 보면, 현재 범사회적 블록체인 기술의 수용도는 가득담긴 욕조 물에 먹물 한 방울 떨어뜨린 정도라 생각됩니다.
Simply put, $BTC was the first to use UTXO, but $ADA pushed it furthest by extending it to smart contracts. $ETH, in my view, went with a simpler account-based model to ship smart contracts fast.
That choice for a quick launch and developer convenience is now coming back as massive technical debt. MEV and sandwich attacks, endlessly growing state, reentrancy and other contract security issues. A design choice from 10 years ago is finally sending the bill, and the fact that they’re now revisiting UTXO proves it.
Cardano saw these problems from day one and built EUTXO, combining the security of Bitcoin’s UTXO with the expressiveness of smart contracts.
And it’s not just EUTXO. Native tokens without smart contracts, mathematically verified proof-of-stake, nodes that run on modest hardware, an on-chain treasury and governance. Cardano already has a lot that’s ahead of the market standard.
As the market matures and people understand the tech better, Cardano will only look more attractive.
한남동 재개발 입주가 빠를까, 미드나잇 상용화가 빠를까, 이번에 CTO @SebastienGllmt 발표한 내용을 시작으로 미드나잇도 다뤄봅니다.
미드나잇 이야기 1편(feat. 멀티체인 시대 열리나?) (출처 : 크립토 리치 | 네이버 블로그) m.blog.naver.com/joseph_suan…
@IOHK_Charles @MidnightNtwrk @midnightfdn
미국 독립혁명도, 동학농민운동도 시작은 세금이었습니다. 세금은 단순히 '돈 내는게 싫어요' 가 아니라 '납득'의 문제이기 때문입니다.
갠적으로 부동산 정책을 지지합니다(보유자임). 서울기준 고가주택은 내리고 중저가는 오르며 격차가 줄고 있습니다. 각설하고 대다수(머릿 수기준) 입장에선 사다리를 걷어차는 게 아니라 사다리 간격을 좁히는 정책입니다. 국가 미래에 대한 목표가 분명하니 납득이 됩니다.
그런데 디지털자산 과세는 납득이 안 됩니다.
이형일 부총리가 "500만원 미만 보유자가 청년층의 90%라 세부담이 미미할 것"이라고 했습니다. 이 말에 투자자들이 왜 분노하는지 아셔야 합니다.
그 500만원은 '소액투자'가 아니라 '남은 돈'입니다. 하락장에도 로드맵대로 개발 중인 알트코인 상당수가 고점 대비 -80~90%입니다. 5천만원을 넣은 사람 계좌에 500만원이 찍혀 있는 겁니다. 이런 상식도 없이 "대부분 소액만 하시더라고요~"고 하면 세금을 내야하는 쪽에서 납득이 됩니까?
더군다나 그 손실이 이월도 안된대요. 10억을 잃은 다음 해에 1억원을 회복하면, 9억원 손해인 사람인데 세금을 냅니다.
이형일님은 금투세는 "시장이 안정된 뒤 검토"라면서 코인은 "예정대로"라고 했습니다. 폐지된 금투세조차 기본공제가 5천만원이었는데 코인은 250만원입니다. 형평을 말하려면 기준이 같아야 합니다.
2018년 법무부 박상기 장관의 "거래소 폐쇄", 유시민 작가의 "디지털 쓰레기"라는 말들에 시장이 요동쳤고, 한국은 산업의 초기 기회를 놓쳤습니다. 우리는 그 판단에 대한 설명이나 사과를 들은 기억이 없습니다. 그런데 이제 "세 번 미뤘으니 이번엔 한다"고 합니다. 부부싸움에서 잘못했다는 말 없이 자기 할 말만 하면 받아들여지던가요. 그게 순서가 맞습니까?
돈은 물과 같아서 손으로 막는다고 막아지지 않습니다. 물길을 내서 우리 쪽으로 흐르게 하는 것이 진정한 행정이고 전략입니다.
공부 열심히 하셔서 엘리트 관료가 되신건 알겠는데, 엉덩이 힘과 시장을 읽는 능력은 쓰는 근육이 다르죠.
쩝. 제가 볼 땐 지금 관료나 조직 리더십에게 필요한 건 시장을 보는 눈, 공감능력, 그리고 커뮤니케이션 역량입니다. 보고서의 평균값 말고 투자자 계좌를 직접 한 번 들여다봐 주세요.
@Jaemyung_Lee 대통령님, 깝깝합니다.
mt.co.kr/society/2026/09/28/…
마인드가 그 사람의 미래를 결정한다해도 과언이 아님.
아시안게임 금메달 따고
사과문까지 쓰게 만든 축구대표팀 논란 3가지.
1. 이기혁
금메달 확정 후 카메라를 향해
“저 군대 안 갑니다”라고 외쳤다가
병역의 의무를 가볍게 여겼다는 비판을 받고 사과.
2. 박승수
금메달 직후 라커룸에서 ‘전역모’를 쓴 사진을 올렸다가
아직 군 복무를 하지 않은 선수가 병역 혜택을 희화화했다는 비판을 받고 사과.
3. 양민혁
“메달이나 트로피보다 군 면제라는 보상 하나만 보고 경기를 한 것 같다”는 취지의 발언이 논란이 되자
금메달의 의미를 가볍게 생각한 것처럼 보이게 했다며 사과.
금메달은 땄는데
귀국해서는 세 명 모두 고개를 숙였다.
캡틴인 이유는 영상에서 .
천재들의 생각은 나눌수록 사회가 이로워짐.. 🤣🤣 찰스 호스킨슨 UN 뉴욕본부 연설(번역본 포함) 소식 공유드림. 🙏🙏
UN에서 미드나잇 깨알 홍보한 찰스(feat. 한글 번역본 포함) (출처 : 크립토 리치 | 네이버 블로그) m.blog.naver.com/joseph_suan…
@IOHK_Charles @IOGroup @MidnightNtwrk @midnightfdn
