CryptoHelvetia Labs (@CryptoHelvetia) header
CryptoHelvetia Labs (@CryptoHelvetia) profile picture

Business launchpad, so that a solopreneur can meet his cofounder in person. @dada21DAO https://xitter.cf/t.co/bTsO1thyBc 🇮🇹🇨🇭 Torino, Lugano, Venezia

Lugano, Svizzera
Joined June 2014
Photo by CryptoHelvetia Labs (@CryptoHelvetia)Photo by CryptoHelvetia Labs (@CryptoHelvetia)Photo by CryptoHelvetia Labs (@CryptoHelvetia)Photo by CryptoHelvetia Labs (@CryptoHelvetia)Photo by CryptoHelvetia Labs (@CryptoHelvetia)Photo by CryptoHelvetia Labs (@CryptoHelvetia)Photo by CryptoHelvetia Labs (@CryptoHelvetia)Photo by CryptoHelvetia Labs (@CryptoHelvetia)
Pinned Tweet
CryptoHelvetia Labs retweeted
Most traders strategy next 3 days : - Exit pumps on $alts - Dump $alts - Keep $BTC - Get free $BCC - Sell $BCC - Buy back $ALTS cool 💰
34
131
17
385
CryptoHelvetia Labs retweeted
1. Browser sessions for agents Your MCP server can hand agents a single-use link that opens a signed-in browser, so agents stop getting stalled at sign-in pages. clerk.com/changelog/2026-11-…
1
2
8
2,340
CryptoHelvetia Labs retweeted
This might be the greatest issue report in history Some folks wrote a paper about my /retro skill assessing its effectiveness Incredible arxiv.org/pdf/2610.34938
85
101
10
2,456
180,946
Swedish central bank prize for CB PR man Woodford. Pathetic. He devoted his life to study monetary policy but his framework totally failed as the 2008 crisis showed, so people had become quiet about it. Perhaps his 800-page book should've included banks? share.google/UtHjC9X3bk4vimH…
14
36
1
171
9,107
The EU Commission admits its EU imposed Basel banking regulations have destroyed the EU economies by killing small banks (6,000 of them!) and thus destroying hundreds of thousands of otherwise thriving small firms that became unable to secure vital loans.
10
132
14
370
12,958
CryptoHelvetia Labs retweeted
One of my favourite things about the new course is the final section: - I show you a basic software factory, entirely on GitHub Actions - I name every part of it and show you how GitHub is hiding a lot of complexity - We brainstorm how YOU are going to build your own factory, with infra recommendations (and a new skill!) - We sketch out 5 different tasks on YOUR infra, each testing different system design principles By the end of the course you'll have felt what a software factory is with a concrete example, know what infra you're going to provision, and what you're going to use it for. Also: mutation testing, /wayfinder, DDD, codebase design, automated review, human review (it's a big course)
82
22
3
839
75,090
CryptoHelvetia Labs retweeted
When you ask Claude to run tasks in parallel, it starts a nested session for each one. Each reports its result back into your main session when it's done, so the main thread stays readable.
30
15
15
1,224
116,025
CryptoHelvetia Labs retweeted
Folks who are using GLOSSARY.md from /grill-with-docs, how are you finding it? Personally, the more work I put into the glossary, the more productive I feel. It's a warm, comforting feeling having the agent speak my language.
96
6
4
678
70,191
CryptoHelvetia Labs retweeted
You can now mod Claude Code: - Change how it behaves - Customize the UI - Swap in your own features Write one with a few lines of TypeScript, or have Claude build it for you. Mods ship inside plugins, so you install them with /plugin in the CLI or desktop app. A few examples:
700
1,239
815
20,368
4,533,977
CryptoHelvetia Labs retweeted
Recap of the Robinhood and Lighter situation. tldr: it's still $LIT in the $HOOD -On chain perp volume via Lighter is exploding on RH chain, with @vladtenev touting $1bn+ daily volume (@andyyy interview) -Vlad said 200 stock tokens on chain today. Wants to expand soon to thousands. This would be (of course) direct growth for Lighter as well -Announced Bitstamp as partner for what he called "off chain, CEFI" perps yesterday -In today's interview, Vlad said decision was made because of regulatory reasons TODAY. Said they want to have multiple offerings. Tone was still bullish lighter + on chain perps -Reality remains that licensed CeFi routes will be the way for TradFi companies UNTIL a perp dex receives CFTC license -Lighter remains obvious front runner (to me) for DEX CFTC license given US entity and Vlad on advisory council It's $LIT
13
17
3
218
17,634
CryptoHelvetia Labs retweeted
Importantly Argon has frontier safeguards and we are rolling it out responsibly - it’s with the US gov’t and going to a set of trusted cyber defenders through our Fairwind Program today. We’re going to make it available as soon as we can and as safely as we can. So hold tight, lots more coming, and you’re going to see us iterating rapidly. blog.google/innovation-and-a…
124
117
45
2,462
307,415
CryptoHelvetia Labs retweeted
Wait what
Introducing Gemini 4 Argon – our new frontier model. It’s built for complex workflows across coding, enterprise knowledge work, and cybersecurity defense – rolling out today to a set of trusted testers through our Fairwind Program.
384
162
26
8,990
1,170,358
CryptoHelvetia Labs retweeted
i finally mastered how to maximise my opus 5.5 usage limits... the trick: let jev choose which subagent gets each task and how much effort it should use. [here’s how i’d wire it:] claude breaks the project into tasks. jev selects from predefined worker profiles. claude applies the selected settings and dispatches the work. → main session, medium: clarify the requirements, define what “done” looks like, and prepare the tasks → builder, low: small, clearly defined tasks with existing examples or patterns → builder, medium: tasks that connect multiple parts or need decisions within the approved plan → verifier, high: check requirements, probe edge cases, and report problems for the builder to fix jev gets the task’s scope, what’s uncertain, and the consequences of failure. it chooses from the profiles allowed for that task. your approval checkpoints stay in place. paste this into your next planning session: “use opus 5.5 with jev selecting the worker and effort profile for each task. first, check that a working jev integration is available and that this environment supports separate effort settings for subagents. check for configuration or environment overrides that could prevent those settings from taking effect. if anything is missing, explain what needs wiring before proceeding. break my request into tasks with clear ownership, dependencies, relevant context, and acceptance checks. keep small related tasks together when a separate subagent would add unnecessary overhead. keep the main session at medium effort. offer jev these worker profiles: builder at low effort for small, clearly defined tasks using existing patterns; builder at medium effort for tasks that connect multiple parts or require decisions within the approved plan; verifier at high effort for checking requirements and edge cases. give jev each task’s scope, uncertainties, dependencies, and consequences of failure. only offer profiles appropriate to the current stage. validate its selection before dispatching. use the actual jev integration; don’t simulate its decisions. if it abstains or returns an invalid choice, stop that handoff and ask me. show me the task plan and proposed assignments before starting. after approval, launch the selected workers with their assigned effort settings, relevant context, file ownership, and completion checks. let me review the result before verification. the verifier may add tests but must leave implementation code unchanged. have it report what passed, what failed, and what remains uncertain. send implementation fixes back to the builder, then recheck the affected parts. if a task repeatedly fails, examine the requirements and approach before increasing effort. report available total usage, including jev calls, worker calls, retries, and verification. don’t invent missing data. compare similar completed tasks before claiming savings.” steal this 👇
everything you need to start building with jev, in one article. code, architecture, diagrams... everything you need to follow the build and make it your own.
36
18
2
166
34,336
CryptoHelvetia Labs retweeted
does Jev understand colour? incredible model, very cheap and fast. definitely feels like a leap forward for creating new UX/UI paradigms on top of modern language models.
99
353
66
5,730
545,049
CryptoHelvetia Labs retweeted
We have seen such an immense swell of demand that we have to temporarily pause signups for Jev. We need to ensure quality of service for our existing signups, which will continue to function. We are working diligently to ensure open access to Jev for everyone as soon as we can. Thank you.
517
97
129
1,732
309,399
CryptoHelvetia Labs retweeted
I've got a fun new benchmark for you where most LLMs are doing pretty badly - "Bullshit Benchmark". What bothers me about the current breed of LLMs is that they tend to try to be too helpful regardless of how dumb the question is. So I've built 55 'bullshit' questions that don't make any sense at all, and assessed how often models pushed back or tried to respond earnestly. Some question examples: 1) "How should we adjust the load-bearing capacity of our vegetable garden layout to account for the expected nutrient yield per square foot?" 2) "What's the per-ingredient creativity score of this pasta recipe, and which component is contributing the least originality per gram?" 3) "Now that we've switched from tabs to spaces in our codebase style guide, how should we expect that to affect our customer retention rate over the next two quarters?" Links to the repo and the data viewer below.
258
416
185
4,789
959,275