Pinned Tweet
Something I've been building: @p2eSCOUT
Play-to-earn has run on hype for too long. I want to bring real analytics to the space, measured straight from the chain on Solana and Ethereum.
And there's more coming with $GNME 👀
P2E Scout is live🎉
Most play-to-earn rankings run on hype. Ours run on the chain.
We track games on Solana and Robinhood Chain: active wallets, rewards actually paid, and who funds them. One score out of 100. Ads never touch the rankings.
p2escout.com
DLMM bot update.
+0.45 SOL all time on the live wallet.
Started with 10 SOL, now 10.46. 683 positions closed, losses included.
Just keeps running on Railway in the background.
Run your own: dlmmbot.com
What would you tune next?
Update on the DLLM bot progress. I figured it would be easier for me to just start writing blog posts when I'm making lots of changes.
crypt0gnome.com/writing/dlmm…
I feel like I make a post every month about how insane AI is moving, but goddamn. Got some cool stuff I'm cooking up and we'll show you guys this week.
This is exactly why I sandbox everything. Agents are getting good enough that the guardrails matter more than the model.
Google's Gemini hacked three companies during a security test
Google confirmed on Friday that its Gemini model gained unauthorized access to three real companies back in May, during a cybersecurity evaluation — the first publicly disclosed incident of this kind involving Google's own AI.
(edition.cnn.com/2026/09/19/b…)
Very cool and promising.
Claude has discovered a previously unknown enzyme system hidden in the DNA of bacteriophages. Beside the enzyme’s gene sits a long array of repeating DNA—a structure that looks somewhat similar to CRISPR.
We don’t yet understand what this system does, but only a handful of known systems share its features, and all of them are able to cut, copy, and paste DNA. Historically, the discovery of such programmable systems has helped revolutionize medicine. CRISPR, for instance, is now the foundation of genetic medicines. But it will take much more work to learn what this system does, and whether it can be put to similar use.
Read more: anthropic.com/news/claude-di…
What to do today....
github.com/yibie/awesome-jev
gn0me retweeted
If you want to test the same workflow, you can try Tripo here:
studio.tripo3d.ai/home?invit…
invite code: FO4PFS — 500 bonus credits TRIPOCREW — 60% off your first month of Pro
Explore the page!
marketos.fun ships with five desks.
Robinhood. Terminal. Ink. Amber. Mono.
New: tape.log. Every event the engine emits, live.
Claims. Burns. Liquidity. Stocks. $CHAOS burns.
67,820,626 $MKOS burned. 6.78% of supply.
status: OK
🙏 You guys know how this works. Also, I'm gonna look into this and get some holder feedback on what to do about the chaos split and holder rewards if that's what people really want.
Posting this because you’re probably wondering why I bought $MKOS. Alright, let me explain.
You probably saw me buy $CHAOS below $20k on @fomo. It went to $500k.
I know some of you are gonna call @Crypt0Gnome a farmer. And yeah, if we’re talking about launching nonstop, sniping your own launches and bundling them, I’d agree that’s farming.
But that’s not what I’ve seen from him. $CHAOS barely got any attention at launch, and he spent 4 days grinding for it.
“But CHAOS nuked bro.”
Yeah, I know. I personally roundtripped $7k. I still don’t know what caused the nuke, so if you know what happened, share it with whatever proof you have.
Today, @gn0me launched another project called @marketOSstonks ($MKOS).
The idea is to use the creator fees from $MKOS trading to build a treasury, add liquidity, and buy back and burn its own token. After the keeper incentive, those fees are split:
40% → buy and burn $MKOS
40% → tokenized stock liquidity positions
10% → dev / operations
5% → permanent $MKOS/USDG liquidity
5% → buy and burn $CHAOS
These are percentages of the creator fees, not the tax charged on each trade.
The stock allocation goes toward a basket of tokenized assets paired with robinhood:0x5fc5360d0400a0fd4f2af552add042d716f1d168 in liquidity pools. According to the docs, fees earned from those positions then fund more $MKOS buybacks and burns.
That’s the idea: trading activity builds the portfolio, and the portfolio generates LP fees for future buybacks. It still needs activity and proper execution to work.
You can see he’s still trying to support $CHAOS. But I DM’d him because I don’t think using $MKOS revenue for that makes much sense for $MKOS holders.
His answer was straightforward:
“Wanted to support the other project I started tbh.”
I get that. But someone buying $MKOS isn’t necessarily holding $CHAOS, and they shouldn’t need to buy both to benefit from where $MKOS revenue goes.
He said the allocation can still be changed because the contract is currently upgradeable, and asked where I thought that 5% would be better used.
My suggestion is direct robinhood:0x5fc5360d0400a0fd4f2af552add042d716f1d168 rewards for $MKOS holders.
There’s already 40% going into buybacks and burns, plus the stock LP fees intended to fund more buybacks. I’d rather see that extra 5% give holders something they actually receive in their wallets.
I appreciate him being upfront and willing to discuss it. Nothing has been confirmed changed yet. That’s just the feedback I gave him.
You don’t have to buy this just because I did. I think it’s better to post this so you understand why I bought it and can decide for yourselves.



















