.

Joined March 2009
“We can start having slave girls again.” – Muslim community leader in the UK. A local Muslim preacher told his community about the importance of enslaving non-Muslim girls to stop Muslim fathers from raping their own baby daughters when mothers are unavailable to change diapers. Islam is incompatible with the 21st century! Sharia blasphemy law has no place in the civilized world!
John Cleese is not the threat to Britain. The people who reported him to Prevent are. They called him an Islamophobic hate preacher. His offence? Preferring a culture that does not approve of FGM, child marriage, and killing infidels. Prevent was built for terrorists. They filed it on a comedian. I have criticised him myself. He treated Israel as an enemy and wants Britain set against Israeli interests, because “Britain first” apparently means offence whenever British and Israeli interests align. If you stand with Israel, criticise him. Do not silence him. We answer in the open. We do not protect speech only when it flatters us. He handed us the reply. Use it. Let the bias against Israel sit where it cannot be defended. We do not need John Cleese’s approval to exist. We will defend ourselves anyway. We will never be a threat to his freedom. Britain must stop persecuting its own people to appease hostile jihadists.
1,308
12,946
1,217
22,966
701,032
La barbarie méthodique palestinienne du 7 octobre détaillée par des preuves photographiques et scanners. Attention contenu choquant. Le professeur Chen Kugel, directeur du Centre national de médecine légale d'Abu Kabir en Israël, publie aujourd'hui dans Ynet des détails atroces. - Corps écrasés : Des clichés de scanners montrent des crânes broyés par des véhicules, nécessitant l'extraction d'ADN à partir de minuscules fragments d'os pour identifier les disparus. - Mutilations et décapitations : Les légistes ont documenté des corps mutilés avant et après la mort, des décapitations, des visages défigurés délibérément et des tirs ciblés sur les parties génitales de victimes ligotées. - Brûlés vifs : L'autopsie de certaines victimes a révélé la présence de suie dans la trachée, apportant la preuve scientifique irréfutable qu'elles respiraient encore au moment où le feu a été mis à leur corps. - Mode opératoires : Les examens ont montré des tactiques coordonnées et variées selon les lieux : des ouvriers étrangers enfermés et abattus aux jambes pour qu'ils se vident de leur sang, des exécutions de personnes ligotées, ou encore l'utilisation d'accélérateurs de combustion dans les pièces sécurisées (mamad) pour les transformer "crématoriums" irrespirables. En tout le centre a reçu plus de 3 000 sacs de dépouilles, de fragments d'os et de restes calcinés. Plus de 900 corps de victimes y ont été traités. Photos : le crâne d'une victime du 7 octobre écrasé par des Palestiniens.
334
3,338
259
7,973
571,613
Brendan O’Neill keeps absolutely nailing it on Ireland. Every word here! “Shameless, absurd people.” 🎯🎯🎯
204
664
27
4,400
103,687
This story has broken me. It has unleashed a rage so strong I can barely express it, but allow me to try. Above all, I am angry with the decades-long malevolent incompetence of the British state: politicians of all parties, the judiciary, the civil service. Their collective uselessness has shattered the social contract and made us all poorer and less safe. In just 25 years, they have led us from an affluent, high-trust society to a broken, low-trust one. I am sickened by the growth in sectarian politics. I am appalled by the foreign ghettos in our cities and imported, bent voting practices and resultant corruption in some of our councils. I hate seeing the clothing of female oppression on our streets. I am sickened by the fact our Jewish community lives under siege. I no longer wish to pay tax to support those who have come here illegally and should be removed immediately. It is to our shame that we have accepted mass immigration without insisting on integration. I am tired of being told that a British passport makes a foreigner as British as me. I assure you that the “British citizen” in this story is not. I am saddened that for so many people, the concept of “British” is essentially meaningless. I am sick of the obsession with a minor war 2,500 miles away that barely affects us. I despise that £88m of our tax money is going to Hamas (because it will), when the tax burden is a record high, everything is expensive, welfare spending is out of control and we can’t even pay for our own defences when the global risk of conflict is the highest it has been since the end of the Cold War. And in spite of how much of our money the government steals from our pockets, nothing, at all, in this country works. Healthcare, transport, education - all broken. It is a stain on our national politics that we have five Gaza MPs. It is our national shame that our government is intent on sucking up to the Palestinian entity which contains some of the worst monsters on the face of planet. It is a disgrace that our Foreign Secretary shook the hand of the representative of the Iranian regime that has slaughtered tens of thousands of its own people, and that he doesn’t seem to understand why that photograph will damn him forever. It is embarrassing that we had a Foreign Office minister dancing with and hugging the representative of the Palestinian Authority. The lack of serious statesmanship is mind-boggling and indicative of how far we have fallen. They say the past is a foreign country, but my goodness, do I miss the country I grew up in. I feel so sorry for the generation that grew up after 2000 and will never know how good it was. It’s not coming back. I have no time for the demagogues and grifters who exploit this anger. I know other people feel the same as I do, and my goodness, do I understand why people are angry. For decades, those we have elected to govern in our interests have instead run our country into the ground. And to cap it all, now we are led by fatuous, asinine, deeply unserious airheads who think serious governance is a TikTok video about pork scratchings, as the last vestiges of a coherent society die under the weight of their malignant frivolity. The worst part of it is that there is absolutely nothing any of us can do about it. I just want to live in a happy, stable, prosperous country like we used to be, instead of one that is run by a state apparatus that does nothing but beat us down, obsess over irrelevances, take our money, and leave us poorer and less safe.
594
3,042
366
11,601
342,040
Cronos retweeted
Look, we all know that the Gaza genocide conspiracy theory is debunked nonsense. But some people aren’t aware. So here are four square infographics to share with your friends and enemies.
165
1,161
170
4,808
309,553
I was trying to help famed Gaza photojournalist @PalPress24 create more realistic victims to dupe western progressives, but it turns out he’s a BIGOT. First I reach out offering to meet and assist.🧵1/3
64
610
135
3,036
335,623
Every time someone says "1948," we only get half the story. So here's the whole thing. In November 1947, the UN voted to divide the land into two states, one Jewish and one Arab. The UN didn't give the Jews a country. It recognized a people with 3,000 years of roots in the land, who had been promised a home since 1917. The Jews got a small, fragmented territory, and Jerusalem wasn't even part of it. They said yes anyway. The Arab leaders said no. The day after the vote, Jewish buses were attacked, and the country slid into war. And to those who say Israel stole a country. There was no Palestinian state to steal from. The land had been ruled by the Ottomans for 400 years and then by the British. Israel got its share through the UN. The rest came from a war the other side started. On May 14, 1948, Israel declared independence. The next day, five Arab armies invaded from Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq. The goal wasn't a Palestinian state. The goal was that there would be no Jewish state. Israel had no real army and barely any weapons, and many of its soldiers were Holocaust survivors who had come ashore only months earlier. They won because the alternative was to die. Yes, around 700,000 Palestinians lost their homes in that war. Some were expelled by Israeli forces. That's documented, and it shouldn't be denied. Others fled the fighting, and some were told by their own leaders to leave their villages until the Arab armies had won. They didn't. But there was another expulsion nobody talks about. Around 850,000 Jews were driven out or pushed out of Arab countries like Iraq, Egypt, Yemen, and Morocco. Families who had lived there for centuries lost everything. The Jews of Jerusalem's Old City were expelled by Jordan. Israel took them in and gave them new lives. The Arab countries did the opposite with the Palestinians. They kept them in camps and in refugee status that is now passed down to the fourth generation, so today there are nearly six million registered refugees. In Lebanon, they're still barred from a long list of professions. And from 1948 to 1967, Jordan held the West Bank and Egypt held Gaza. Neither of them created a Palestinian state. They could have done it at any time. Israel took in refugees, drained swamps, and built a beautiful country with no oil and enemies on every border. The Palestinian leaders were offered the same chance, and they chose war instead. Imagine what could have been built if they had said yes. The roughly 160,000 Arabs who stayed in Israel became Israeli citizens. Today they number around two million, with the right to vote, their own parties, and seats in parliament. So when someone says Israel was built on expulsion, remember the whole picture. The Palestinians were offered a state before Israel even existed. The Arab side chose war. Israel defended itself. Israel didn't start that war. It just refused to lose it. Am Israel Chai.❤️‍🔥
802
2,836
212
9,657
265,891
The most striking chart I’ve seen in a while
331
2,431
250
10,940
1,049,712
Cronos retweeted
Estoy harto de oír a la gente decir: «Fue solo Hamás». Miles de civiles de Gaza invadieron Israel el 7 de octubre de 2023 y, además, violaron, lincharon asesinaron y secuestraron a personas inocentes. Decenas de miles de gazatíes celebraron aquel día.
607
5,449
333
18,950
763,387
They call it carpet bombing because the slogan is easier than watching the opening seconds of the tape. This is declassified aerial footage from the first days of the war. In the first few seconds the drones catch Hamas rockets leaving a residential block. The white streaks are outgoing fire, not incoming. Then the aircraft hit the ground those rockets just left. The impacts are discrete. The neighborhood is still there around the smoke. That is not an area weapon walking street by street until nothing remains. That is a launch site being answered in the same grid it was fired from. Hamas put the tubes between houses on purpose. The accusation that follows is always the same. Israel is leveling a city at random. The tape says the opposite. The fire started from those roofs and courtyards, and the strike went back to the place the fire came from. If you want to keep the carpet-bombing line after this clip, you are not arguing about targeting. You are arguing against the picture.
50
1,062
47
4,688
292,277
What the world demands is that Israelis should have allowed Hamas to run rampage and allowed all these missiles to land without responding. These are missile alerts since October 2023. They demand that there be no defence to continuous aggression They demand Israelis die without a fight. Never.
147
1,033
132
3,878
710,507
96% of Jews in Poland were murdered by the Nazis. That is genocide. 3% of Gaza’s population, mostly male combatants, died in the war they started. That is not genocide.
1,995
10,706
306
71,467
936,239
For three years the word “occupation” has been treated as settled law instead of what it actually is, a political weapon with a prefix that only ever gets attached to Israel. @HausdorffMedia sits down on @triggerpod and does the thing almost nobody in Western media will do. She applies the same rule the world applies everywhere else. Uti possidetis juris. When a state is born and there is no agreed partition, the pre-existing administrative lines become the borders. Latin America after Spain. Africa and Asia after the empires. Ukraine after the Soviet collapse. That is why Russia in Crimea is called an occupier. Crimea was inside Ukraine’s lines at independence. In 1948 those lines for Israel were the British Mandate. The West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza sat inside them. Jordan and Egypt then seized that land in a war meant to kill the state at birth. In 1967 Israel took it back. You do not occupy what was already yours. If Ukraine walked back into Crimea tomorrow, nobody serious would call that an occupation. Israel later put a temporary administrative frame over Judea and Samaria because it was still playing land for peace and thought Jordan might take the West Bank. Jordan signed peace in 1994 and wanted nothing to do with it. Oslo created Areas A, B, and C. None of that turns a recovered Mandate territory into someone else’s country by slogan. “Illegal occupation” is not a category the Geneva Conventions run around the planet applying to Northern Cyprus or Nagorno-Karabakh or the other real occupations. It is a blood label reserved for one state, and it was designed to make diplomacy and campuses and courtrooms start from a lie. She says the consequences of that lie include October 7. Watch the whole clip. Then try saying “illegal occupation” again as if it were a fact instead of a campaign.
9
170
17
414
14,339
Bill Maher on the “genocide” lie in Gaza. There is NO genocide. This MUST go viral.
697
10,856
392
35,335
517,484
A fact often omitted from discussions about Israel’s borders: The 1949 Armistice Line between Israel and Jordan, commonly called the “Green Line,” was explicitly NOT established as a permanent international border. The Israel-Jordan General Armistice Agreement said so in remarkably clear language. Article VI(9): “The Armistice Demarcation Lines… are agreed upon by the Parties without prejudice to future territorial settlements or boundary lines or to claims of either Party relating thereto.” Article II(2) went further, stating that nothing in the agreement would prejudice either side’s “rights, claims and positions” in an eventual peaceful settlement and that the armistice provisions were “dictated exclusively by military considerations.” Article IV(2) explained the purpose of the lines: to mark the point beyond which the armed forces of the two sides would not move. In other words, the Green Line was an armistice demarcation line drawn after the 1948 war, not a mutually agreed permanent political border.
15
182
16
439
20,503