
A true crime podcast hosted by @chelseadeanne with a focus on lesser known and #MMIW cases. She/her. Contact: [email protected]
Joined August 2020
- Tweets4K
- Following195
- Followers3.4K
- Likes2.6K
In January 1983, Katherine “Kit” Mordick was in the middle of a divorce and preparing to for a big move. Six days before a court date pertaining to the divorce proceedings, Kit was murdered in her home. More than two decades came and went before Kit’s family saw justice served.
Crime and Crime Again Podcast retweeted
A 16-year-old has been charged as an adult in connection with the killing of his 18-year-old stepsister, Anna Kepner, while on a cruise in November 2025. The suspect is charged with first-degree murder and aggravated sexual abuse. If convicted, the defendant faces a maximum penalty of life in prison.
More: tinyurl.com/y5xx5r5w
I *personally* don’t like to use the phrase “true crime fans.” We are listeners and creators.
There really is no ethical way to describe yourself as a “fan” in this space.
Just a few hours until a new episode finally drops! I can’t believe it’s been an entire year since I uploaded an episode. I’m glad to be back at it.
Crime and Crime Again Podcast retweeted
🎙️INDIE PODCASTERS:
Now offering $25 an episode ($100 for 4 episodes) to be professionally sound designed, audio edited, and assembled. Provide any extra instructions. Simple as that! 🖤
Please DM me or email me @ [email protected]
Starting TODAY!
✨ Please RT!
Any guys out there want to do a small voiceover thing for one of my episodes? There’s a few journal excerpts that were written by a man, and I feel like reading them myself just wouldn’t have the same impact.
Life has been a little chaotic lately! I am working on new episodes, but they won’t be released for a little while, as I’m expecting a new baby boy at the end of this month! 🩵
Soon enough, I’ll be back in the swing of things.
Anyone else dealing with whatever virus is currently going around? Not many symptoms but I somehow still feel like garbage. 😷
Wait. Are they saying that his *phone* did not travel that route during those hours, meaning his car could not have been captured on surveillance video? Because his phone has to be with his car? Am I reading this wrong?




















