England, UK
Joined August 2008
1/ "Boris did/not go to Perugia in Italy" - why does this matter? A thread. Background first. On the 17th Sept, officials at Perugia airport said Johnson was there "in the last few days". Later they confirmed he "landed on the 11th at 2pm and left on the 14th at 7:45am".
288
4,676
1,192
10,086
14/ But it also shouldn't be forbidden to talk about it, to try and understand the causes, and to learn about different perspectives from different groups. Neither should it be controversial to be against an occupation and the killing of innocent children.
1
1
17/ The Bell review and subsequent Govt reaction are a prime example of cherry-picking data to fit a narrative. They've taken a tiny sample size, found 1 aspect to be alarming, and then banned all mention of Israel from after half-term.
1
8
18/ That is wrong on many levels, and the Bell recommendations are about to introduce a hierarchy of racism into UK schools and public life based on a bunch of logical fallacies. /end
4
7/ When asked a follow-up question of "Have you personally experienced or witnessed antisemitism at your school/college?" the number of Jewish kids who said "yes" dropped down to 40%. *actual* not *think* = 40%
1
8
13/ Look, I condemn all forms of racism. And no child should be the victim of any sort of harassment, bullying or discrimination. And the 36 Jewish kids who faced direct antisemitism is 36 too many. Our systems and institutions should work to eradicate it.
1
1
12/ Bell appears to have made some incredibly authoritarian and sweeping recommendations based on 36 responses. His review aids to weaponise antisemitism rather than reporting it. And the Govt has foolishly adopted all 27 recommendations, many of which are deeply flawed.
1
7
11/ …took the survey, out of 5,114 kids overall who took the survey, out of 72,000 Jewish Kids in the UK, out of 12.6 million kids in school and college right now. 36 kids with an opinion. Out of 12.6 million.
1
4
10/ The Govt and the Bell review appear to have structured all of its recommendations based on these 36 affected surveyed Jewish children who *thought* it might be because of their religion, out of 59 Jewish kids who actually answered that question, out of 86 Jewish kids who…
1
5
9/ In other words, a few dozen Jewish kids *thought* they were bullied or harassed more because of their religion, but *actually*, they were bullied or harassed the same as other non-Jewish kids for non-religious reasons. Not such a catchy headline, though.
1
2
8/ This is important because it is directly in line with the incidences of non-Jewish kids reporting actual experiences of bullying based on race (46%), gender identity (40%), and sexual orientation (39%).
1
4/ Next, we find that just 86 children in the survey identified as Jewish. 86. Anyway, of those 86, 35 said they had experienced or witnessed "discrimination, bullying, or harassment". Not necessarily antisemitism either.
1
2
6/ So 36 Jewish Children *think* their treatment is because of their religion out of the 59 who answered that question. 36/59 = 60%. That is the Govt's headline.
1
1
5/ When asked a further question about the nature of that bullying, 59 Jewish children answered, and 36 said they *think* it was because of their "Religion or belief". *think*
1
1/ So the Govt and Mainstream Media have lost their shit about "critical" levels of "rampant" antisemitism in schools. Headlines are suggesting "3 in 5 Jewish kids are facing racism and discrimination in schools".
1
42
3/ The report fails to mention that around 60% of Jewish children attend Jewish-only schools and doesn't separate the data in that way because I would guess that including this fact would imply that antisemitism might also be rife in Jewish-only schools!
1
6
2/ But the data from the research doesn't support this obvious hyperbole. 5,114 kids took part in the survey, and given there are 12.6 million young people in school and college in the UK, that is a woeful 0.04% sample.
1
14
#nffc actually announce a 23-man squad. Aaron Bott named as 4th keeper - 1 of only 5 teams to list 4. Premier League says Marato is listed too. Forest are the only team to have listed a loaned-out player in their squad. Recall option?
Nottingham Forest’s Premier League squad for the 2026/27 campaign has been confirmed. 📋
2
2,111