Western liberals imported the third world into France and other countries in the name of diversity and compassion. They ignored fundamental questions of assimilation and compatibility. They were told it would lead to this and they didn't listen.
I pray that France, a beautiful country of amazing people, will stop this madness before more of its landmarks burn.
And I hope Americans are paying attention. This is the future congressional Democrats seek for your country.
Corbin Schuster retweeted
DON’T LET THE PROBLEMS IN EUROPE ARRIVE IN AUSTRALIA.
Our thoughts go out to the people in Europe who are suffering as a result of riots in France and Italy.
Poor economic management over the last four decades has led to high inflation, unaffordable housing, high living costs and record levels of immigration.
Not just here in Australia but across Western countries as a whole.
Instead of focusing on service delivery, governments have focused on control. There has been far too much government overreach into peoples personal lives, alongside record levels of wasteful government spending.
The decline in education and manufacturing has hollowed out western economies that has had to propped up by government spending and high immigration.
In Europe, what started as student protests about school conditions and the lack of resources and funding has now turned into a civil war between the left, the right and governments.
The Labor government needs to tighten the bolts on the mechanism the uniparty has engineered. We need to put Australia first and protect what we have, to stop the overseas demonstrations from coming here.
It is our responsibility, as citizens and as a nation, to stand up for ourselves and to prevent conflicts like those that are occurring overseas from taking place.
Don't be fooled by the major parties - none of them have the economic answers. Yes immigration has to be lowered but this is only the start of the reform that has to take place.
People First has the policies in place to undo the damage by the current and previous governments.
In particular we will:
• cut taxes
• cut wasteful government spending
• cut regulation
• cut immigration
• stop capital flight and
• reform our banking system that is milking us dry
Join us today to build the machine to beat the machine at Peoplefirstparty.au
Into the wheaten hay.
Too dry for the second baler (without steamer) but this one's making perfect bales with @StefH4 behind the wheel.
Keen to try these through the hay plant tomorrow!
Hay baling season is upon us!
Time to wrap grass in string with our clean green steam machine @StaheliWest
On a side note...we don't normally let red machines in the paddock (We're mainly John Deeres and Fendts!), but we were willing to make an exception with today's visitor! 😍
Corbin Schuster retweeted
BIBLICAL-LIKE CRIMSON LIGHTNING bolt LIGHTS UP France's MIDNIGHT SKY — photographer catches RARE SPRITE in SPLIT-SECOND SHOT
Corbin Schuster retweeted
A retired NASA engineer who had worked on the Space Shuttle program for 25 years was hired by SpaceX at age 62. He described the first week as the most disorienting experience of his professional life.
At NASA, a design change required 3 meetings, 2 committees, a review board, and 6 to 18 months of documentation. At SpaceX, his new supervisor said "if it works, build it. If it doesn't, change it by Friday."
He sat at his desk after the first day and called his wife. He told her he felt like a man who had been swimming with ankle weights for 25 years and someone just cut them off. He could move. He could decide. He could build something in the morning and test it in the afternoon. The constraint that he had accepted as the nature of aerospace engineering turned out to be the nature of bureaucracy.
Within 6 months he had contributed to more design iterations than he had completed in his last 5 years at NASA. Not because he was working harder. Because the time between having an idea and testing the idea collapsed from months to hours. The same brain. The same knowledge. A different operating system.
He described a specific moment where he proposed a modification to a Raptor engine component. At NASA, the proposal would have entered a queue. At SpaceX, the modification was machined by the end of the day and tested by the following morning. He watched his idea become a physical object in 18 hours. At NASA, 18 hours would not have been enough to schedule the first meeting to discuss whether to schedule a meeting.
He told an interviewer: "I didn't get smarter when I went to SpaceX. I got faster. The intelligence was always there. The system was in the way."
The difference between SpaceX and NASA is not talent. NASA has extraordinary talent. The difference is the time between a thought and a test. SpaceX compresses it. NASA elongates it. The same engineer produces 10x more at SpaceX than at NASA because the bottleneck was never the engineer. It was the meetings about the meetings about the work.
Awesome view from the tractor cab tonight, too good not to share.
Front row seat to the storms rolling in!
The utility (constructive versus destructive) of this tech will depend on whose hands it falls into.
The extension of this from gaming to AI remote piloting/controlling drones on a battlefield concerns me.
Unbelievable powerful for good or bad - akin to humans splitting the atom
Replying to @teslayoda
We’re making interesting progress here.
Digital Optimus can play about halfway through the Diablo campaign so far just by looking at the screen like a human.
Skill at Counter-Strike and other fast games is good too.
League is also in training.
Goal is to generalize across all games.
Regardless of costs, the difference in annual vehicle output per employee is crazy, such a stark productivity contrast
Corbin Schuster retweeted
You need to hear this if you haven’t figured out why Labor’s “Modern Australia” doesn’t include Australians.
Whilst you’re listening, remember all of the times Albanese has said these terms:
Indian-Australian
Muslim-Australian
Jewish-Australian
African-Australian
Instead of just “Australian”.
Part of the Managed Decline in order to globalise under Agenda 2030, they must tear down any sense of nationalism or patriotism to one’s own country.
This is a UNIPARTY agenda. Any party which supports UN, WEF, WHO or any other globalised agenda cannot be trusted to govern in the interest of Australians.
Corbin Schuster retweeted
Parkinson’s Law – Why the State Bureaucracy Grows When the Work Shrinks
In 1955, a British naval historian wrote a joke for The Economist. Seventy years later, it remains one of the most accurate descriptions of the modern state ever written. Everyone knows the slogan: work expands to fill the time available. Almost no one knows the mechanism underneath it. That mechanism explains Europe.
1. The evidence. Between 1914 and 1928, the Royal Navy lost two thirds of its largest warships. Over the same years the Admiralty – the office that ran the ships – grew by three quarters. There were fewer ships and more men behind desks. Then there was the Colonial Office, which kept growing while the colonies left one by one. It was hiring while the empire was shrinking.
2. The first mechanism. An official who feels overworked has three choices. He can resign, he can share the work with a colleague, or he can ask for two subordinates. He never chooses the colleague, because a colleague is a rival. Two subordinates are a rank. So one tired man becomes three. Then each of the two subordinates feels tired.
3. The second mechanism. Seven people now do what one did, and they keep each other busy with drafts, approvals, and comments on the approvals. Everyone works hard, and nothing is produced. You have been in this meeting. You have been copied on this email. You have watched three people sign the form that one person filled in.
4. The law of triviality. Parkinson noticed that a committee will approve a nuclear reactor in minutes, because nobody understands it. The same committee will debate the bicycle shed for an hour, because everybody does. Bureaucracy does not avoid the important question by accident. It avoids it by design – the small question carries no risk, and on the big one, someone’s name goes on the decision.
5. The ratchet. A business that fails closes. A department that fails gets a bigger budget, because the problem is now bigger. Failure is the bureaucracy’s best argument for itself. This is why the state never shrinks on its own: every problem it does not solve becomes a new office for solving it.
6. The civilizational lesson. Burnham described the managers taking over. Parkinson showed how they breed. Put the two together and you get Brussels. You get France, where the state spends more than half of everything the country produces and still cannot fix a hospital. This is not because the people inside are wicked. It is because the machine works exactly as Parkinson said it would.
7. The vindication. Parkinson was dismissed as a humorist. Then Milei cut Argentina’s ministries in half – and the country did not collapse. It barely noticed, except on the bill. The lesson is simple: you cannot reform a bureaucracy by asking it what to cut. It will always propose to cut the ships – and hire someone to manage the cut.
The reason why some countries don't have many circumcisions is because the doctors there got the sack...






















