Someone reports a bug in Slack. They tag @Ship.
Ship tries it in your test app 3 times. It fails every time, so the bug is real.
You get a replay, the logs, the likely cause and a test, so this bug gets checked on every release from now on.
No more "can't reproduce."
A normal day with Ship on your team. Three moments.
Morning: a pull request opens. Before anyone reviews it, Ship has worked out what it could break and tested it on the real app.
Afternoon: a customer in Chicago says "something is not working." Normally that means hours of "can you send a screenshot?" Ship reproduces the issue and points to where it is likely coming from.
Evening: the fix is in. Ship tests it one more time and keeps that test, so the same bug does not come back next month.
Less waiting. Fewer surprises. More time to build.
See how Ship works: ship.contextqa.com/?utm_sour…
#Ship #ContextQA #QA #SoftwareTesting #AIAgents
Most enterprise AI testing pilots look great in the demo.
Julian Mardirosian (VP Sales, ContextQA) speaks at the Software Quality Summit in Austin, Oct 23.
Come say hi if you are there.
A 10-minute accessibility check. No tools needed.
1. Sign up with only the keyboard
2. Zoom to 200%. Is anything cut off?
3. Listen to your homepage with a screen reader
4. Every image has alt text
5. Grey text passes a contrast check
Save this.
About 1 in 6 people live with a significant disability (WHO). Most never report a bug. They just leave.
Printable checklist, and how we run these on every test:
contextqa.com/?utm_source=x&…
2:00 AM: the agent ships a small login fix.
2:07 AM: "Invalid password."
It was the right password.
Every team has a 2:07 AM story. What's yours?
Our ambassadors spent today putting Ship to work on their own apps.
Now we want your list.
What's one user flow you'd never trust an AI to test? We'll run the best answers next week.
Want to join the next session?
contextqa.com/the-agentic-qu…
We launched Ship this week, and the first question people asked was simple: what does it actually do?
Three things.
1. When you open a PR, Ship tests what actually got deployed, not just the code that changed.
2. When someone reports a bug in Slack or Linear, Ship reproduces it and shows you exactly how it fails.
3. When it finds something, it hands Claude or Codex the full picture: replay, logs and the likely root cause. The fix starts from evidence, not guesswork.
One thing we were firm about from day one: Ship does not merge or ship anything on its own. Your team still makes the call.
Coding agents made teams faster at writing code. Ship makes sure what gets deployed actually works.
Try it on one PR: tinyurl.com/2bn5kjja
#QualityEngineering #SoftwareTesting #AIAgents #DevTools
5 visual bugs your tests will happily pass:
1. A button pushed off screen on small phones
2. Text on top of an image
3. Black text on black in dark mode
4. A font that never loaded
5. A popup covering the Pay button
Only screenshot comparison catches them. Save this.
This is what visual regression testing is for. How we do it:
contextqa.com/?utm_source=x&…
Last week OpenAI made Codex up to 8x faster with Ultrafast.
A faster fix is still a fix nobody has checked. One change can touch login, checkout, coupons and refunds.
What do you run before you merge an AI fix?
If you learned test automation, you probably learned it from @rahulshettyacad.
His bestselling AI testing course now has a new 54-minute section on ContextQA.
Requirements to test cases. Web and mobile. No locators. You stay in control.
Thank you, Rahul.
The course: udemy.com/course/generative-…
Try ContextQA: accounts.contextqa.com/onboa…
5,000 manual test cases, automated in minutes.
We met IBM's team at SXSW. Their Build Partner team helped us bring watsonx.ai into ContextQA, and its language models turned existing manual tests into automated ones. No rewrite, no custom model.
Full story in the reply.

