Over 20 years defending rights, especially when threatened by the govt's nat sec and police powers. Now at the Project On Government Oversight (@POGOwatchdog).

Washington, D.C.
Joined October 2008
The Constitution Project retweeted
"Congress must step up and pass legislation that stops dragnet surveillance in all of its forms, not just Flock cameras." Read @donbellct in @fulcrum_us on why the surveillance state is bigger than just Flock cameras & what must be done to dismantle it: thefulcrum.us/media-technolo…
1
13
1
18
976
The Constitution Project retweeted
This is huge: a judge ruled a Flock search was 'indiscriminate mass surveillance' and unconstitutional. Says the search by a cop violated the driver's Fourth Amendment rights. Meaning, Flock should require a warrant 404media.co/federal-judge-ru…
13
147
10
409
16,098
The Constitution Project retweeted
We must chart a new path forward that protects our privacy. As people across the country rise up against cameras tracking their every move, Congress must act to protect privacy and dismantle the surveillance state. Read more from @DonBellCT: bit.ly/4yyI5Vd
2
1
4
560
The Constitution Project retweeted
The latest from surveillance expert @DonBellCT: Congress must act to protect privacy and dismantle the surveillance state. Why? Because if the federal government can use unrestrained AI to spy on the public, the right to privacy will be obliterated. pogo.org/commentaries/is-the…
3
5
574
The Constitution Project retweeted
Today is #ConstitutionDay. There's no better way to honor the Constitution than to reach out to your members of Congress and demand they protect the rights it guarantees. We need real limits on surveillance technology. Now. act.pogo.org/a/tell-congress…
5
1
8
452
The Constitution Project retweeted
The Fourth Amendment isn't optional. bit.ly/4zOcPCC
8
17
668
The Constitution Project retweeted
ICYMI: last week, we demanded an investigation of DHS exploiting its administrative subpoena authority to secretly obtain records of journalists, labor unions, and nonprofits. pogo.org/policy-letters/urge…
1
7
8
604
The Constitution Project retweeted
New: a secretive DHS predictive policing unit is analyzing Americans' financial activity, feeding those names to police, then having cops pull them over. Not suspected of specific crime. We're revealing unit name: Predictive Intelligence Targeting Team 404media.co/a-secretive-dhs-…
143
2,461
343
6,042
907,136
The Constitution Project retweeted
The current dangers of Flock and other ALPR networks are just the tip of the iceberg: AI monitoring of driving patterns that flag you to be pulled over for “suspicions” driving, facial recognition, and scanning videos to track people are being built in: techpolicy.press/unless-floc…
STOP FLOCK. STOP AI MASS SURVEILLANCE. Totalitarianism is when a government or another entity with overwhelming power seeks to know, control and influence everything you do, say and even think. I fear very much that if we don't act aggressively, that is where we’re heading. You may not know it, but you may already be being tracked by artificial intelligence. Flock, a surveillance company backed by Big Tech oligarchs like Marc Andreessen and Peter Thiel, has installed more than 120,000 AI-powered surveillance cameras across America. These AI cameras scan and record 20 BILLION vehicles every month across more than 6,000 communities. What does that mean for you? It means that if Flock is in your community, every time you leave your house, a Flock camera records and tracks you. If you are dropping your kids off at school, Flock knows. If you are going to a doctor, Flock knows. If you are going out on a date, Flock knows. And that’s not all. Newer Flock cameras do not just record vehicles. They record people. Flock’s AI system can combine images of you and your vehicle with databases of phone numbers, relatives and court records to find out who you are, where you're going and why. In my view, this raises some very fundamental questions. Do we want to live in an America where AI companies like Flock can work with the government to track our every movement? Do we want to live in an America where our privacy rights and civil liberties — enshrined in the Constitution — are traded away so that AI oligarchs can collect more information, and increase their profits even more? The answer must be NO. We cannot allow America to become a surveillance state where a handful of AI oligarchs profit by giving the government the power to track our every movement. We must come together to stop Flock and AI mass surveillance. That is why I will soon be introducing legislation to do just that.
1
2
141
The Constitution Project retweeted
"If you are driving down the street and you see a Flock camera or an automated license plate reader, you immediately start asking questions like how did it get here?" -@DonBellCT quoted in @insider_ct about serious concerns with Flock cameras ctinsider.com/connecticut/ar…
4
1
9
860
The Constitution Project retweeted
Jay Clayton has been confirmed as Director of National Intelligence (DNI). What’s next for Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act? 1/17
1
9
14
1,677
The Constitution Project retweeted
Folks, we have a new DNI. Senate confirms Jay Clayton on party-line vote
Confirmed, 51-47: Confirmation of Executive Calendar #833, Walter Clayton to be Director of National Intelligence.
4
8
1
41
12,929
The Constitution Project retweeted
One thing that’s notably absent from this list: FISA Section 702 reauthorization With the House gone, FISA wouldn’t reach Trump’s desk until September anyway Senators also note that the telecom companies are still providing data to the intel community for the time being
Thune has a long list of things he wants to get done before recess (Russia sanctions, CR, noms, more) but he can’t seem to escape the SAVE drama Mike Lee says he’ll force a vote to block recess; would fail but is intended to shame R’s who vote to adjourn while SAVE remains stalled (it wouldn’t pass even if Senate stayed for all of August; also prevents vulnerable incumbents from going home to campaign) On tap for this week: —Jay Clayton procedural vote tonight; confirmation tomorrow night —Russia sanctions procedural vote tomorrow night (hours after Zelensky meets w/ bipartisan Senate group). Goal is to run up the tally on that vote to build momentum for a time agreement; Dems are split over the bill’s tariff authorities —Blanche committee vote Thursday —Votes on noms package (74 noms) —Thune wants bipartisan CR deal this week, possible to start voting on it with a time agreement. Talks going well but Dems objecting to some WH anomalies like the Trump-class battleships punchbowl.news/article/senat…
4
1
33
12,921
The Constitution Project retweeted
POGO is hiring! We're looking for a Fact Checker/Editor to help ensure our written products advance our mission to expose corruption and abuse of power in the federal government. Submit your application here by Aug 5th! ⬇️ pogo.breezy.hr/p/f7b5d3926c6…
2
3
1
6
579
The Constitution Project retweeted
Jay Clayton's entry as director of national intelligence was meant to give intel community-supporting Dems an excuse to extend the expired warrantless spying provision in FISA...until Clayton showed he's as willing to do Trump's bidding as Bill Pulte. prospect.org/2026/07/16/clay…
2
8
15
2,507
The Constitution Project retweeted
WARNER: "We're coming into election season. I want to make sure... you will commit you will not interfere or comment inappropriately on US elections." Clayton: "The role [DNI] is to deal with foreign interference in US elections, which is something I'm gravely concerned about."
DNI nominee Jay Clayton at his Senate confirmation hearing: "We we have substantial work to do in improving our electoral processes. It's part of national security, and I feel strongly about that."
1
2
180
The Constitution Project retweeted
Tomorrow, the Senate is holding a confirmation hearing for Jay Clayton’s nomination to be Director of National Intelligence. We’re urging senators to push for answers on closing the backdoor search loophole & the data broker loophole. He should commit to defending your privacy.
4
6
603