@ConCourtSA

Official profile for the Constitutional Court of South Africa.

 Johannesburg, South Africa
concourt.org.za/
Joined May 2015
  • Tweets3.1K
  • Following0
  • Followers124K
1KMedia
(8/8) CCT 11/25 Brain Gear Investments (Pty) Ltd v Buhle Waste (Pty) Ltd and Others; CCT 12/25 Sembcorp Silulumanzi (RF) (Pty) Ltd and Others v Buhle Waste (Pty) Ltd and Others and CCT 25/25 Sembcorp Utilities (Netherlands) NV v Buhle Waste (Pty) Ltd and Others
61
(7/8) If the appeal fails on its merits, should this Court interfere with the remedy of remittal?
1
61
(4/8) Are there grounds to interfere with the conclusion that the delay should be condoned?
1
22
(5/8) Could Buhle Waste exhaust the internal appeal in section 62 of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act 32 of 2000 when it learnt of the impugned decision? If so, should the non‑exhaustion of that remedy be overlooked?
1
23
(6/8) If the merits of the review are reached, should this Court interfere with the conclusions reached by the High Court and SCA?
1
18
(3/8) If not, was the Municipality’s decision nevertheless reviewable under the principle of legality?
1
24
(1/8) Judgment to be handed down on Friday, 9 October 2026 at 10h00: Did the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) order nullify the result achieved in the settlement order?
2
613
(2/8) Is the Municipality’s decision “administrative action” in terms of Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000?
1
39
(1/4) Judgment to be handed down on Friday, 09 October 2026 at 10h00: Whether Parliament failed to facilitate meaningful public participation during the legislative process for the National Environmental Management Laws Amendment Act 2 of 2022 (NEMLA Act)?
19
5
2
7
2,838
more replies
(3/4) Whether the NEMLA Act should be declared unconstitutional and invalid due to Parliament’s alleged shortcomings during the public participation process?
1
1
345
(4/4) CCT 270/24 South African Hunters and Game Conservation Association v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others
1
296
(1/3) Judgment on Wednesday, 7 October 2026 at 10h00: Section 152 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 excludes post-commencement creditors from participating in the vote on a business rescue plan. This interpretation accords with the statutory scheme.
7
4
4
4
4,389
more replies
(3/3) CCT 37/25 and CCT 38/25 Salungano Group Limited v Mashwayi Projects (Pty) Ltd and Others; Ndalamo Coal (Pty) Ltd v Mashwayi Projects (Pty) Ltd and Others
1
438
342
(1/3) Judgment to be handed down on Wednesday, 7 October 2026 at 10h00: Are post-commencement creditors entitled to vote on the adoption of a business rescue plan under the Companies Act 71 of 2008?
52
19
4
25
16,791
(2/3) If post-commencement creditors cannot vote, was the business rescue plan validly adopted?
3
2
4
4,148
(3/3) CCT 37/25 and 38/25 Salungano Group Ltd v Mashwayi Projects (Pty) Ltd and Others; Ndalamo Coal (Pty) Ltd v Mashwayi Projects (Pty) Ltd and Others
1
2
2,135
(1/5) Judgment on Thursday 17 September 2026 at 10h00: The Constitutional Court considered whether Parliament failed to comply with its constitutional obligation to facilitate public involvement before passing the Public Procurement Act 28 of 2024.
7
17
3
34
10,712
more replies
1
1
1
657
1
1
1
629
Load more