Musée de l'#informatique unique en Belgique ! Aux sources du #numérique, des machines qui comptent.

Namur, Belgique
Joined October 2017
ComputerMuseum NAMIP retweeted
In 1990 Andreas Kromke (the author of KAOS TOS, the heavily modified and performance-tuned TOS for the ST range) looked at TOS and said: one program at a time? No, thanks. Mag!X was born, later MagiC: a real multitasking OS for the Atari ST, with several GEM apps running side by side in their own windows, and still happy with software written for TOS. It was a commercial product for years. Then Kromke did something few authors do: he opened the complete sources under the GPLv3. And this year he shipped MagiC 6.30 for Atari computers. In 2026. On a 68000. Respect. Normally MagiC boots from disk: TOS starts first, then a loader pulls the kernel into RAM. We thought that was a waste of perfectly good RAM, so we built the MagiC ROM Builder. It turns MagiC 6.30 into a 256 KB ROM image that boots in place of TOS, plus the boot floppy or hard disk files for its desktop. Everything happens in your browser, nothing to install. Flash it with the SidecarTridge TOS Emulator on an STE or Mega STE, or on an ST or Mega ST with the 256KB Decoder. No TOS needed, around 240 KB more free RAM, and it boots straight into a multitasking desktop. Build your ROM: magic.sidecartridge.com/ MagiC sources by Andreas Kromke: gitlab.com/AndreasK/Atari-Ma…
3
24
1
105
2,257
ComputerMuseum NAMIP retweeted
Why did playing the original Quake (1996) over the internet feel like swimming in glue until QuakeWorld arrived? Because Quake sent your movement inputs to the server and waited for the response before showing your character move. On dial-up, that could mean hundreds of milliseconds of delay. John Carmack rewrote the netcode so your client could simulate your movement immediately (Client-Side Prediction) and correct it when authoritative updates arrived from the server. That basic architecture still powers many modern multiplayer shooters, nearly 30 years later.
30
32
9
808
23,888
ComputerMuseum NAMIP retweeted
🤖 Made with AI
30
167
22
1,110
24,074
ComputerMuseum NAMIP retweeted
[Prix Nobel 🥇] #rediff Le Belge Francis Halzen reçoit le prix Nobel de physique 2026 ! Il est récompensé pour sa contribution décisive à l'observatoire de neutrinos IceCube et à la découverte des neutrinos de haute énergie d’origine astrophysique. dailyscience.be/19/05/2021/l…
2
1
43
ComputerMuseum NAMIP retweeted
Steve Jobs passed away 15 years ago today, on October 5th, 2011. This is what Apple's website looked like on that day. Where were you when you heard the news, and how did you react? Looking back, did you think Apple would ever become what it is today?
64
212
22
1,606
51,824
ComputerMuseum NAMIP retweeted
Some software disappears simply because nobody thought to save it. Old games and programs can vanish even when they once made headlines, leaving only scattered disks and memories behind. 💾 Journalist Josh Renaud recounts the effort to recover obscure software and preserve it through the Internet Archive. 🖥️ 📚 Renaud’s "Recovering Lost Software" appears in the pages of VANISHING CULTURE from the Internet Archive. 📖 Download & read, FREE: archive.org/details/vanishin… #BookTwitter
6
144
2
519
17,047
ComputerMuseum NAMIP retweeted
Fiche de lecture : From Markup to Markdown (Jim Hall) Des gens croient que la seule façon d'écrire est d'utiliser un logiciel de traitement de textes graphique. Mais il existe une autre méthode, ancienne mais toujours valable, les langages de marquage. bortzmeyer.org/from-markup-t…
1
6
17
1,185
ComputerMuseum NAMIP retweeted
Why is the x86 undefined instruction called ud2? blog.adafruit.com/2026/09/28…
5
43
5,782
ComputerMuseum NAMIP retweeted
Septembre 1976 - Jarre enregistre Oxygene dans la cuisine de son appartement parisien, sur son premier synthétiseur analogique, un EMS VCS3, qui ressemblait à un standard téléphonique. Il y a cinquante ans. Oxygene Part IV | JM Jarre | 1976.
156
1,261
102
5,715
190,757
Aux États-Unis, ce jouet s'appelle Etch A Sketch. Il a été inventé par un électricien de Montrouge. Pendant des années, le brevet a porté le nom d'un autre homme. En France, on l'appelle le Télécran. Son inventeur s'appelle André Cassagnes. Il est né il y a 100 ans jour pour jour, le 23 septembre 1926. Un jour, il pose une plaque d'interrupteur. Il trace un trait de crayon sur un film transparent, et le trait apparaît de l'autre côté. Il en tire un jouet. Deux boutons. Derrière la vitre, une pointe cachée gratte une poudre d'aluminium. On secoue, tout s'efface. Il n'a pas d'argent, alors il passe par un financeur. En 1959, le brevet est déposé au nom d'Arthur Granjean, qui s'occupe des papiers chez ce financeur. Un fabricant américain, Ohio Art, hésite, puis achète la licence. À Noël 1960, le jouet est dans les magasins. 600 000 exemplaires la première année. Le jouet le plus américain des chambres d'enfants vient de la tête d'un électricien de la banlieue parisienne.
44
431
22
1,781
49,138
ComputerMuseum NAMIP retweeted
This week I build Bill of Materials management platform (BOM Manager) to track parts for hardware retro projects. Guide is here github.com/alk0v/bom-manager… Repo is here github.com/alk0v/bom-manager… Feel free to try.
1
1
8
401
ComputerMuseum NAMIP retweeted
This is the story of FCKGW-RHQQ2-YXRKT-8TG6W-2B7Q8. I was the primary author of Windows Product Activation on the operating systems side. Not the key math – those were the ACTUALLY smart guys with heads so big that they bumped the doorjamb on the way into your office. I just did the protection of and integration into the operating system. As you likely recall, Product Activation required that you have a key, and you’d have to activate it online or over the phone. But Microsoft had large corporate customers, think hundreds of thousands of PCs, and those customers did not want to have to activate every offline PC. So in that case, you would be given special “Volume Media” that could be unlocked with a Volume key. That way, a volume key could never unlock your retail CD. Now, to know what media you have, I inspect the disc image. And the Volume licensing media contained a special binary blob that I made. It was about 10MB of data, entropy stripped, hard to duplicate on Usenet at the time. And it was only present on the Volume media. That secret data, which I hashed and checked to match to the key, was Microsoft Bob. I took their disc data and compressed and encrypted it several times. Rest assured it’s encrypted and even in the AI age no one has extracted it yet. I really just needed random data, so I started with a precompressed binary image because, secretly, I was young and didn’t know if I could trust CryptGenRand  And so, if you ever tried the FCKGW key on a regular XP CD, it wouldn’t work, because you didn’t have Bob buried in your bits. But if you had the means in 1995 to download large ISO binaries or copy CDs, all it took was the key and a copy of the disc. The key itself still had to pass the product-key validation math (the part I didn’t own). Once it did, WPA simply skipped the rest of the process. That combination—valid VLK + matching volume media—is what made the install look fully legitimate, including early Windows Update checks. How it leaked RTM went to manufacturing on 24 August 2001. Retail launch was 25 October. Roughly five weeks before launch the warez group Devils0wn (often written “Devil’s Own”) posted a complete, non-beta “Windows XP Pro Corporate” ISO together with the FCKGW key. That ISO was the volume media. Pirates then started baking the key into images or just writing it on the CD with a Sharpie. The famous photo of the marked-up disc is from that scene. The most plausible source is an OEM or hardware partner that received final media early so they could ship PCs on launch day. Dell is the name that comes up most often; Intel has also been mentioned because of later source dumps. There were very few organizations that actually possessed a VLK that early, which is why the timing points at a partner rather than a random corporate customer. But I do not know. Presumably someone does. Aftermath We started blacklisting the Product IDs that belonged to the leaked keys (FCKGW decoded to one of the 640-range PIDs we later treated as toxic) in SP1. SP2 and Windows Genuine Advantage made the check more aggressive and also started blocking updates for those installs. Other, un-leaked VLKs continued to work on volume media for years; Microsoft did not kill the entire volume-licensing path, just the ones that had escaped. So the design decision was “give trusted big customers a convenient offline path.” The operational failure was that the media and one of those keys left the building before the product even reached stores. Once both pieces were public, WPA’s hardware-binding never got a chance to run. These Days If you’re curious about what I’m doing today, check out Task Manager TMOG at tmog.org where you can download the Free version! It runs fully native on Windows, Mac, and Linux!
411
1,132
154
9,219
820,721
ComputerMuseum NAMIP retweeted
🧮 Claude peut-il faire tomber la conjecture de Riemann ? Des nombres premiers, une fonction zêta et une mystérieuse droite de coordonnée ½. On vous explique ce bazar. Images Webb, NASA/ESA/CSA/STScI. Portraits, Smithsonian Libraries et Library of Congress, via Wikimedia Commons. Salukes #science #physique #profbucella #lasciencepeuttout #maths
9
52
2
248
11,132
ComputerMuseum NAMIP retweeted
Mathematicians are angry at AI solving their problems, and it's easy to dismiss this as gatekeeping. "A proof is a proof. They just want to keep their jobs / prestige / fun !" But I do think mathematicians have a point, and I'll try to explain using old Civilization-style maps
73
197
57
1,145
265,480
ComputerMuseum NAMIP retweeted
RFC 2324 finally has real market penetration, twenty-five years late.
18
154
19
1,640
80,739
ComputerMuseum NAMIP retweeted
10
62
3
1,001
22,333
ComputerMuseum NAMIP retweeted
Allez voir la vidéo de ce mec. C’est la dernière vidéo de Underscore_ ! Il a vraiment tout compris. Vous allez comprendre à la fois pourquoi il y a des hacks en boucle et à la fois pourquoi cela ne va pas durer… Ceux qui n’ont pas compris cela vont mourir rapidement et ceux qui ont compris cela vont produire des software d’une qualité et d’une sécurité qui n’auront plus rien à voir. Perso j’étais comme lui. Les bandeurs d’IA me fatiguaient jusqu’à fin 2025. Et franchement j’ai la même expérience. Le machin a pris un virage extraordinaire. Cette vidéo est absolument essentielle.
30
50
6
592
51,285