Peeyush 🇮🇳 (@ColPeeyushAgg) header
Peeyush 🇮🇳 (@ColPeeyushAgg) profile picture

Njoy Life

Dehradun, India
Joined August 2016
Saal bhar Pehle.. Aaj bhi wahi hoga..
2
9
24
Hey @SoniaGandhi Don't try to disgrace Indian Army You all, as Pseudo-Gandhis, are a big Disgrace to India and a National Security threat Just be grateful that you are in a Democracy where Military doesn't ask you to behave but we Citizens will surely size you SIT DOWN Shameless ! Cc @CNNnews18 @ndtv @IndiaToday @TimesNow @republic @aajtak @TNNavbharat @TV9Bharatvarsh @Republic_Bharat @indiatvnews @OpIndia_tv @DDNewslive @news24tvchannel @NEWS9 @indiatvnews @News18India @ians_india @PTI_News @ANI On which authority was this Sellout privy to any classified matter including requisitioning of Army? Seems Pseudo-Gandhis as Prime Ministers and MPs didn't adhere to Official Secrets Act @rashtrapatibhvn @VPIndia @loksabhaspeaker
48
220
10
394
6,121
Peeyush 🇮🇳 retweeted
#WATCH | Delhi: On Sonia Gandhi's book, BJP leader HS Phoolka says, "In the book written by Sonia Gandhi, she has attempted to grant a self-clean chit to her own family—even regarding the massacre of Sikhs. In her book, she claims that on the night of October 31st, Rajiv Gandhi instructed the Army Chief, General Vaidya, to call in the Army. She asserts that General Vaidya himself decided against using the Army units stationed near Delhi—purportedly because they included Sikh soldiers—and instead ordered troops from further away, such as Dehradun. She suggests that this was General Vaidya’s personal decision, and that the resulting delay in the troops' arrival caused the delay in their deployment. This account is entirely contrary to the facts. Firstly, the claim that General Vaidya decided not to deploy Sikh soldiers—and that there were no other troops available near Delhi—is completely at odds with the facts. On October 31st and the morning of November 1st, there were 6,000 Army personnel available in Delhi. The Mishra Commission noted that approximately 6,000 soldiers were present in the city, yet they were not deployed. Furthermore, the Mishra Commission stated that had even 5,000 of these soldiers been deployed to march through the streets of Delhi on the morning of November 1st, at least 2,000 Sikh lives could have been saved. This is documented in the Mishra Commission’s report, and the Nanavati Commission has also noted the same. Now, consider the statements provided by the Army Chief, General Vaidya. General Vaidya stated that he took the initiative himself—independent of any instructions from Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi—to ensure the Army was available in Delhi. He consulted the GOC (General Officer Commanding) Delhi, who confirmed that 6,000 troops were available. General Vaidya then proceeded to call in the Army, and the troops arrived by that evening. Furthermore, look at the claim made by Sonia Gandhi—an attempt to absolve herself—that the Army was not available on November 1st and therefore could not be deployed. This is entirely contradicted by the official record. According to the Mishra Commission report, Rajiv Gandhi did alert General Vaidya; however, it is not the Army Chief’s role to unilaterally deploy the Army—that is the responsibility of the civil administration. Moreover, the Mishra Commission noted that had those 5,000 soldiers—who were already present in Delhi on November 1st—been deployed, the lives of 2,000 Sikhs could have been saved. Now, Rajiv Gandhi was the Prime Minister at the time. What action did Rajiv Gandhi take? If Rajiv Gandhi himself is not held responsible, then what action did he take against those who were responsible for these massacres of Sikhs—those who failed to call upon the army, which was readily available in Delhi on November 1st? In his first speech—at his very first rally—Rajiv Gandhi remarked that "when a big tree falls, the earth shakes." In doing so, he essentially attempted to justify the entire massacre. And now, in her book, Sonia Gandhi attempts to absolve Rajiv Gandhi and their family. This stands in direct contradiction to the official record. It is an absolute lie."
37
412
26
1,181
87,969
Peeyush 🇮🇳 retweeted
India🇧🇴 has many reasons to be proud. I surely am.
19
331
9
923
14,989
Peeyush 🇮🇳 retweeted
Beautiful compilation of Valmiki Ramayana in 90 seconds. Jai Shri Ram 🙏🏼😇
18
438
6
1,536
28,650
ले दे के वही शख़्स है इस शहर में अपना... दुनिया कहीं उस को भी समझदार ना कर दे...🍂
5
2
1
29
1,023
Peeyush 🇮🇳 retweeted
ऐसे मंगल धुन में आपकी जिंदगी सदा सजती रहें. दीपावली कि शुभेच्छा
29
55
1
296
8,329
शुभ दीपावली...मां(93+) के आशीर्वाद और जीवन संगनी के साथ...प्रभु कृपा 🙏
1
9
*🪔 शु भ दि पा व ली* 🪔 *आज पासून सुरू होणाऱ्या दिपोत्सवाच्या हार्दिक शुभकामना..!!!*
6
Peeyush 🇮🇳 retweeted
पाँच सौ साल की तपस्या और असंख्य लोगों के बलिदान के बाद 🪔🪔 #अयोध्या_जी
103
892
18
3,307
23,441
Peeyush 🇮🇳 retweeted
Defence Officials gave detailed answered related to Agnipath Scheme. Q1. Are all Agniveers going to be absorbed after six years? Ans: Yes, all Agniveers will now be absorbed in the regular cadre. The first 25% will be absorbed after the first engagement period of four years, and all of the balance 75% will be absorbed (without any limit) after the second engagement period. The key criteria are that the Agniveer must be willing, physically fit and disciplined. Q2. What happens to the seniority of the 75% Agniveers who are not permanently absorbed after four years? Ans: Their seniority is protected. On becoming regulars, they will be placed immediately after their own batchmates who joined the regular cadre after four years. They will therefore not become junior to any subsequent batch. Q3. Has the scheme been rolled back? Ans: The scheme has not been rolled back. Only another engagement period of two years has been introduced, which creates a pathway for all Agniveers to be absorbed as regular soldiers after this engagement period.
112
194
85
1,370
169,859
Peeyush 🇮🇳 retweeted
MAJ GEN YASH MOR, IS THIS ABOUT AGNIVEERS OR ABOUT CLAIMING PERSONAL VICTORY? On October 11, Maj Gen @YashMor5 expressed concern over the future of the 75% Agniveers who couldn't secure permanent retention. He wanted the Government to provide them better opportunities. Fair enough! Now, when the Government moves towards offering these very Agniveers another two years of service, better financial prospects and another opportunity to compete for regular military positions, what does he do? Calls it a ROLLBACK, declares the scheme FOOLISH and congratulates himself for his “courage”! Seriously, General? You wanted the concerns addressed. The Government responds to those concerns. And instead of acknowledging the improvement, you present it as your personal triumph? What an extraordinary display of selective appreciation! The Army leadership had already described Agnipath as an evolving scheme, with a review of retention requirements envisaged for December 2026. An extension of service doesn't abolish Agnipath. Nor does it automatically restore the previous recruitment system. Surely, someone with your military experience understands that distinction! And that line, “Do you appreciate my consistent stand?” General, the real question isn't whether people appreciate your stand. It's whether you can appreciate a policy improvement without turning it into a victory parade for yourself. Criticising a policy is perfectly legitimate. But demanding improvements and then calling those very improvements a defeat for the Government is a rather curious definition of consistency! The Agniveers deserve a serious discussion about their future, not a competition over who gets to take the credit.
Roll back of the Agnipath scheme 📍 Good decision but came too late 📍 This decision amounts to almost the rollback of the scheme. Glad to have stood Rock solid against this foolish scheme. The previous recruitment system was working perfectly fine till someone decided to bring this proposal. Do you appreciate my consistent stand? This is courage 💪🙌💯 Jai Hind 🇮🇳 #agniveer #agnipath
15
26
1
57
8,255
Peeyush 🇮🇳 retweeted
शैलेश लोढ़ा…. कॉक्रोचों को लपेटते लपेटते…. राहुल गांधी को लपेटे में ले लिया… जोधपुर वालों का मोदी के प्रति सॉफ़्ट कॉर्नर तो रहता है… ख़ास लगाव रखते हैं मोदी के प्रति….😂😂
1
136
1
607
25,611
Peeyush 🇮🇳 retweeted
🚨BREAKING AGNIPATH SCHEME REVISED Introduced in June 2022, the Agnipath Scheme provided for recruitment of Agniveers into the Armed Forces for four years, including training. At the end of this period, up to 25% are eligible for permanent enrolment into the regular cadre, while the remaining 75% exit with a Seva Nidhi package. The scheme aimed to create a younger, fitter and more technologically proficient force. New initiative of extended tour of duty for the Agniveers The new modification introduces an additional two-year engagement period for the balance 75% Agniveers, extending their total service tenure from four to six years. 🚨Extended Tenure: Post absorption of 25% Agniveers, the balance 75% Agniveers would be permitted to continue serving for an additional two years after completing their initial four year tenure with an opportunity for 100% absorption and a secure career in the Indian Armed Forces. 🚨Exit Option: Agniveers have the option of non volunteering out of the scheme at 4 years or 6 years. Those who volunteer, subject to medical and discipline, will be retained post their 6 year extended tour of duty with seniority protection within and between batches. 🚨This will offer Agniveers greater financial stability, additional military experience, another opportunity to demonstrate their suitability and a permanent career path, while enabling the Armed Forces to retain trained manpower, strengthen unit continuity and improve returns on training investments. A great step for the youth willing to serve the nation.🇮🇳 #Agniveer #AgniveerRevised
10
23
6
72
20,357
Peeyush 🇮🇳 retweeted
This is awesome 🙏
2
20
2
76
3,837