What if AI creation came with proof? ✨
LART connects 5 specialized agents from sourcing to minting, while recording provenance, ownership, and royalty splits on-chain.
Not just AI creation — creation you can trace.
What matters most: provenance, ownership, or royalties? 👇
One item without a verifiable license, and the whole manifest fails, not just that item.
Data Sourcing checks every asset against a registry or a signed creator grant before training starts, and it's the only agent with write access to the pin set.
Mixed bundles fail closed.
Imagine writing one prompt and getting an article, image, video, and soundtrack that trace back to the same verified source.
AI Studio is public alpha now. Articles, images, video, music, receipts and provenance baked in from the start.
Picture what you'd generate first. 🔍
GPU fine-tuning costs dropped below ten cents an hour. Wallet login shrank to one tap. Settlement runs sub-cent with two-second finality.
Every piece matured at once, right as regulation is about to make provenance mandatory.
Would this have worked eighteen months ago? 😉
By 2026, the EU AI Act and the US Executive Order both require provenance disclosure for commercial AI work.
Platforms without a verifiable graph won't be allowed to sell in major markets, full stop.
This isn't a feature LART added. It's the entry fee everyone will need soon.
Q1: testnet, five agents. Q2: mainnet, audited royalties. Q3: video, audio, a comment graph that actually federates. Q4: self-hosted runtime, governance live.
Then 2027 opens the SDK, and the network stops being LART's alone.
The studio was always temporary.




















