Even Arab leaders admit it. Everyone is sharing the Bill Clinton clip where he describes how Yasser Arafat rejected a generous peace offer at Camp David that would have given the Palestinians a state on 96 percent of the West Bank, land swaps, and a capital in East Jerusalem. Clinton says Arafat lied to him and that the Palestinian leadership never actually wanted a two-state solution. They wanted to destroy Israel. It’s a video often shared by people like @VividProwess, and it’s an important one for people to see. Of course, critics immediately dismiss it. They claim Clinton is biased or he’s pro-Israel. They’ll tell you that you cannot trust the American perspective. Ok, so let us set that aside. Now watch this. In this powerful interview, former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, a major Arab leader who was directly involved in negotiations, says exactly the same thing from the Arab side. He talks about the Mena House Conference in Cairo as well as the Camp David negotiations of 1978. All failed because of the Palestinians repeatedly rejecting any offer. The Oslo accords were signed but because Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad were not involved, they derailed the accords and any chance for peace by initiating 4 years of terrorist suicide attacks in Israel. Then came the second Camp David negotiations in 2000 which Arafat agreed to, then rejected and instead initiated the Second Intifada. Mubarak explains how the Palestinians refused to even participate in the Mena House conference of 1977. He describes repeated opportunities they were given, including a detailed document that called for Israeli withdrawal from the Samaria, Judea and Gaza, security arrangements during a transitional period, and other major concessions. The Israelis were willing to negotiate on difficult issues like who would control security. The Palestinians, according to Mubarak, kept saying no and wasting chance after chance. He speaks with clear frustration about how for decades the Palestinian side has rejected peace initiatives and realistic compromises. The video further shows footage from the PLO representative in 1977, as well as old footage of Egyptian president Sadat who was involved in the Mena House and first Camp David negotiations of 1978. This perhaps is far more impactful than Clinton’s account because it is not a Western or Israeli voice. It is prominent Arab leaders who lived the negotiations, who represented the broader Arab world, and who had zero incentive to defend Israel. When leaders from both sides of the table describe the same pattern of Palestinian rejectionism and violence, it becomes much harder to dismiss as bias. The pattern is clear across decades and across different voices… generous offers, repeated refusals, and continued demands for everything while giving nothing in return. This is not ancient history. It is the core reason the conflict continues today. If you value the truth, please share.

A pro Israel parade in Syria. Not something I thought I'd ever see.

Abdul’s mother cashed the checks for bin Laden, his father is part of the Muslim Brotherhood, and his sister is on a terrorist watch list.

Well, this is quite an inside look at Abdul El-Sayed. Jordan Domingue worked closely with El-Sayed during two campaigns and says he served as his personal assistant and executive protection lead. He describes being the first person to see him in the morning and the last to see him at night, sometimes working 12 to 14 hour days, six or seven days a week. Now he's left El-Sayed's U.S. Senate campaign and he's talking about what he says he saw behind the scenes. And some of it isn't pretty. Domingue says El-Sayed would say one thing to one group and something different to another group just hours later, something Domingue says he once dismissed as the “strategic ambiguity” El-Sayed talked about. He says El-Sayed's management pushed staff members to tears and dangerous breaking points. He disputes El-Sayed's claim of having “10 years of public service experience.” And he describes El-Sayed's more recent tough-guy image as manufactured, saying many of those stories are fake and that the persona wasn't there when he worked with him during his earlier campaign. Those are serious allegations, and Domingue isn't a neutral observer today. He has broken with El-Sayed and is now supporting his Republican opponent, Mike Rogers. But he also isn't somebody who watched El-Sayed from across a room a few times. By his account, he spent an extraordinary amount of time around the man and his family. Which brings me to the detail I absolutely did not expect to find in a U.S. Senate campaign story. The farting. 😂 Domingue says El-Sayed loved to fart openly in front of people without warning because he thought it was hilarious and treated it like his own form of stand-up comedy. I'm sorry. I made it through foreign policy, strategic ambiguity, staff members crying and the manufactured tough-guy image. I was not prepared for that one. 😂 See the link to the article in the comments.

The fact that Abdul El-Seyed’s sister was caught on camera, admitting that Abdul is lying about his positions to fool voters, is simply not getting enough attention.

The Soros Foundation paid for Abdul to go to Medical school and now they’re raising money for him. He’s owned by the Soros family and their stepson, Hasan Piker.

Abdul doesn’t want money out of politics… he’s in California with billionaires, corporate elites, lobbyists, and everyone he claims to be against. He’s a liar and a conman.

These numbers make sense because Gaza has received more aid per capita than any conflict area in recent history. All facilitated by Israel. This doesn't diminish the suffering caused by war, but it does expose the intentional famine claim as an obvious lie.

Women in Gaza are being traded for food, forced to marry their rapists: UN trib.al/kX7S2I6

Square versions in English, Arabic, Spanish, and German

Abdul won’t condemn Iran. In fact, he protects the murderous terror regime. He’s unfit.

“Reportedly” 🤡🤡 Here’s the video, now delete this embarrassing tweet.

.@AbdulElSayed, An Iranian-American asked you one thing: do you condemn the IRGC, the force that has spent 47 years killing and terrorizing 90 million Iranians, and helped butcher Syrians too. You didn’t answer. You put words in his mouth. You pretended he wanted you to cheer a U.S. strike on Iran. You did it because you support the IRGC. The same IRGC that funds Hamas. The same IRGC that funds Hezbollah. Both of which you also defend. I am Iranian. Until my last breath, I stand against you, every cause you support, and anyone who supports you. I will use my platform to expose the monster you and your camp protect, a monster Iranians and Syrians already know by name. I will use my platform to expose you and your evil.