
Co-Founder & Chief Brand Officer, Serotonin | Business Woman of The Year #WOTY23 | Top 10 Female Entrepreneurs To Watch - Telegraph & Natwest | Ultra runner ⛰️
Joined February 2009
- Tweets13.4K
- Following3.6K
- Followers1.8K
- Likes13.2K
Most consumers won’t have noticed this, but I bet marketers have.
More and more brands are repurposing old campaigns, and it's made me realise that somewhere along the way, we've confused consistency with complacency.
Each year, the creative changes with new statistics and evolved stories, but the overarching theme continues the conversation until the gap actually closes.
People forget that brand is a powerful tool for every stakeholder.
For investors, brand is a predictor of resilience.
For acquirers, it’s a prediction on valuation.
For senior hires, it’s proof you’re a business worth betting their career on.
Brand is capital, but it can’t be measured on a spreadsheet or P&L.
That’s something we see often at Serotonin.
When a brand has to work across multiple stakeholders, each with competing priorities.
Right now, businesses are pouring huge amounts into performance marketing.
Conversion rates, click-through rates, time-on-site… every metric, scrutinised.
But here’s the problem: if you only focus on what you can measure, you risk losing sight of the bigger picture.
Performance keeps the engine running. But brand is what makes people care in the first place.
You need both. The challenge is that you can’t always measure brand in neat, short-term metrics.
The biggest risk for legacy brands isn’t irrelevance.
It’s dissonance.
When the story you’ve been telling for decades no longer matches the reality people experience, trust erodes fast. And the longer the brand history, the harder it is to spot that drift.
Bringing story and reality back into alignment, rather than simply defaulting to nostalgia.
That’s what strong brand work does. It doesn’t polish, it recalibrates.


