Anyone who understands logical chains, burden of proof, and basic evidentiary standards can see that Candace has been getting dismantled, often by her own admissions. What’s really being exposed here Candace. It’s how many people have no idea what actually constitutes evidence. A suspicion is not proof. An unanswered question is not proof. A coincidence is not proof. Stacking weak claims on top of each other does not create a strong case. That’s the standard Candace has abused for months while implicating people in Charlie’s death. The debate is exposing her, but it’s also exposing how dangerously low the public’s evidentiary standards have become.