Chuck B retweeted
🚨 er this seems important!
The Unite the Nation march in May this year was heavily restricted by the police and talked about for weeks beforehand by the media as something the country should be terrified of. … Yet, it seems this ‘march’ planned for 20th November is being ignored and I’d argue is what ordinary people should actually be terrified of.
They call it a youth strike (like they did in France) backed by socialist and anti-war organisations and it is encouraging schoolchildren and university students to walk out of lessons and take to the streets.
A demonstration is being advertised for Trafalgar Square in London and this is the organisers’ manifesto …
▪️ The dissolution of NATO and an end to rearmament.
▪️ Opposition to capitalism and demands for socialist change.
▪️ Climate action and an end to fossil fuel capitalism.
▪️ Support for Palestine and opposition to Israel
▪️ Opposition to the political right and anti migrant policies
Their international campaign openly advertises blockades and occupation as well as strikes and demonstrations.
Does the Government know the scale of what is being organised? And what preparations are the Metropolitan Police making for 20 November? Or is this all fine?
Chuck B retweeted
On Channel migrants we've been lied to on a Biblical scale.
Under Maritime Law if they land on our shores they're illegal, if we pick them up they become legal migrants.
The French are break Maritime Law for allowing the unsafe boats to set off. They're obliged to return them.
Check this out:
“As a former RNLI Crewman Volunteer of 15 years let me educate you of Maritime Law if I may.
When these rubber boats set off from France overloaded, the French are breaking maritime law by not intercepting them and returning them to shore. When these illegal migrants boats have sailed almost 3/4 of the way to the UK and now in British waters, the RNLI and Border Force are sent out by the Coastguard on the instructions of HM Government to intercept them. They do this because if the rubber boats are allowed to land on uk soil under their own steam then everyone on board becomes an illegal immigrant and by law MUST be detained and deported asap.
However when they are picked up at sea, even if only 200 yards offshore, and in no danger whatsoever, then the RNLI and Border pick them up and they are longer called illegals - conclusion The French and The British are doing this on purpose - WHY?”
Chuck B retweeted
The anti-Muslim hostility definition is designed to silence criticism of Islam, its history and its practices. It is a direct assault on our fundamental right to free speech.
Baroness Gohir, a member of the House of Lords and of the Working Group tasked with drafting the definition, has claimed that it is “Islamophobic” to point out that most rape-gang perpetrators were Muslim men. This is despite Baroness Casey’s report finding a disproportionate number of perpetrators of child sexual exploitation were men of Pakistani heritage.
Earlier this year, the Free Speech Union revealed that all five members of the Working Group, appointed by Angela Rayner, had troubling links to Islamist organisations.
Rayner’s department then claimed it had deleted all responses to the Working Group’s consultation, apparently breaching the Government’s own data policy. This only fuelled speculation that Islamist extremists may have influenced the drafting of what amounts to a de facto Islamic blasphemy law.
After an investigation, the department claimed that the responses were still held on its data system — but refused to disclose them.
It makes no sense. What is Angela Rayner hiding?
Watch @Katie_Lam_MP’s video 👇
Chuck B retweeted
I’m disgusted we’ve done this to people prepared to put their lives on the line for us.
Imagine jumping from a helicopter behind enemy lines at night to capture an ISIS cell leader, not knowing if you'll come home. Then imagine coming home to a double murder investigation.
In July 2022, five SAS soldiers came under fire in a pitch-black field in Syria. The two people in front of them refused calls to surrender, and the soldiers believed their lives were in danger. They fired. An internal review cleared them on self-defence grounds.
Days after a BBC Panorama on the SAS, the Director of Special Forces overturned that review and referred them to the military police. The soldiers were arrested at secret bases in Syria and Iraq, and their homes were raided. Detectives asked for a sleeping baby to be moved so they could search under its cot.
Forty-eight hours after their police interviews, the same men were sent back to jump out of helicopters into enemy territory, with life sentences hanging over them.
Their legal support was one sheet of A4 listing legal aid solicitors, plus no more than £500. After nearly three years of limbo they were told there would be no charges, but the case could be reopened at any time. They have never been formally cleared.
All five have now left the Army. They've been through broken relationships, drinking, and in one case an attempted suicide. The SAS is losing more experienced soldiers than ever, and the Defence Secretary has refused to meet them.
This is outrageous. They aren't asking to be above the law. They're asking for a fair process. Our soldiers deserve protection from lawfare, not to be treated like criminals by the state they serve.
#SAS #Lawfare #StandWithOurSoldiers
Chuck B retweeted
The Ministry of Justice let a convicted ISIS terrorist loose on our streets.
It took a journalist contacting them for him to be recalled to prison.
Now they say he can’t be deported because he might face mistreatment.
I don’t care about his treatment.
He must be deported.
Chuck B retweeted
This is indoctrination.
Why are the BBC promoting open borders in a game for children?
Deport illegal migrants and you lose points, but let them stay and a lawyer says it will make them “very happy.”
I don’t care about making illegal migrants happy.
They should be deported.
And the BBC must take this game down.
Chuck B retweeted
Check this out:
“As a former RNLI Crewman Volunteer of 15 years let me educate you of Maritime Law if I may.
When these rubber boats set off from France overloaded, the French are breaking maritime law by not intercepting them and returning them to shore. When these illegal migrants boats have sailed almost 3/4 of the way to the UK and now in British waters, the RNLI and Border Force are sent out by the Coastguard on the instructions of HM Government to intercept them. They do this because if the rubber boats are allowed to land on uk soil under their own steam then everyone on board becomes an illegal immigrant and by law MUST be detained and deported asap.
However when they are picked up at sea, even if only 200 yards offshore, and in no danger whatsoever, then the RNLI and Border pick them up and they are longer called illegals - conclusion The French and The British are doing this on purpose - WHY?”
Chuck B retweeted
Thames Valley's own Police & Crime Commissioner @matthewbarberUK warns 1,256 single men at MoD Bicester will bring "a greater risk of violent and sexual offences."
Police know it. Piddington knows it. Everyone knows it.
Except the Government. Head in the sand.
@ShabanaMahmood, reply publicly.
Chuck B retweeted
Ok you have to laugh … the out of work immigrant population in Birmingham are complaining.
“In Birmingham, our reporter interviewed a local man named Mohammad Khan. And he said: “Here it is hard to get a job. A lot of students come and pick up part-time jobs. They take over the housing. They work for a lower rate and they can speak English.” “
In a …how dare British students who speak English come here and take our jobs - sort of way 🤡
Full very funny article from the Telegraph
Chuck B retweeted
incredible to think this could be the last meeting at Anfield between the sides for the foreseeable future. This was the meeting in English football and the quality was never higher than between 2018 and 2022. Over those four seasons, Man City amassed 358 points (3 titles). Liverpool’s total was 357 (1 title)
Chuck B retweeted
“England is the best because I get everything for free,” says random foreigner.
“I don’t care who’s in power as long as I get free stuff.” 🏴
C/O @StevenEdginton
Chuck B retweeted
A Muslim ☪️ is made to look a fool when he condemns a supposed paedophile email sent by Jeffrey Epstein.
It's actually Hadith 5080 by Sahih al-Bukhari, I ve fact checked it.
Chuck B retweeted
QUESTIONS
What is the point of a Chief Constable who can’t assure the safety of 35 elderly men walking down a public road ?
What is the point of the Parades Commission ?
What is the point of the Executive with lawbreakers as Ministers in it ?
Why does the SofS always support Republicans wishes ?
Chuck B retweeted
I wonder how they feel about their little slogan now?
On the left, National Front 1988.
On the right, Green Party 2026.
How clear do you want it? greens4palestine.uk/
Chuck B retweeted
‼️ City Are Guilty. Now Make the Punishment Fit the Crime
I’ve written a lot about the Manchester City case over the years and people have often asked me the same question:
What punishment would you impose if the findings survive appeal?
Well, here it is.
Finish this Premier League season, but impose a points deduction sufficient to guarantee relegation and, subject to acceptance, allow the EFL to place them wherever they see fit.
Then:
- No parachute payments.
- 30 point deduction the following season.
- 20 points the season after that.
- 10 points the season after that.
- Three years of severe transfer spending restrictions.
- Strip the domestic honours directly affected, including those after the initial investigatory period, and leave them vacant. No retrospective champions.
- Pay compensation where rival clubs can demonstrate genuine financial loss.
And finally, any owners, directors or senior executives implicated in the wrongdoing (potentially: Sheikh Mansour, Khaldoon Al Mubarak, Ferran Soriano, Danny Wilson, Claire Catlin, Txiki Begiristain etc.) should face the regulator’s suitability process and, where they fail it, be banned from English football.
I don’t want Manchester City Football Club destroyed forever. City supporters, Liam Gallagher included, didn’t devise financial schemes or sit around boardroom tables constructing sham arrangements.
I want the competitive advantage gained through years of rule breaking destroyed, and those responsible held accountable.
One enormous points deduction followed by promotion and business as usual wouldn’t cut it.
The consequences should follow City for years.
Because if nine seasons of serious financial wrongdoing can ultimately be overcome with one bad season and a large cheque, what deterrent is there?
Make the punishment hurt. Make it last. Make sure nobody ever considers doing it again.
