Techie by day, photographer by night. Always chasing the next AI breakthrough!

New York City
Joined May 2023
Jeetu Patel said the quiet part at Webexone 2026: “Most people a couple layers below get afraid their jobs will be done, so we made it easy for our people.” @nyike's write-up of the event makes culture the first job for CIOs on AI adoption. I agree, and the order Cisco followed is the part most enterprises get wrong. Arvind Jain, @Glean told the room he isn’t seeing enough top-down AI transformation. I hear the same thing in client conversations every week. Employees build agents on their own, a lot of what they build is low value, and sprawl follows. The CIO then gets asked to clean it up and show ROI on work nobody scoped. @jpatel41 , Anurag Dhingra and Snorre Kjesbu, @cisco described a different order. Developers got unlimited tokens first. Every employee got a personal agent next. Only after the habit formed did leadership ask teams to show value for their token spend, and now they are moving to per-employee token budgets. Controls came after fluency, and they came with a number attached. Most of the enterprises I work with started from the other end. They wrote the AI policy and stood up a review board before anyone outside the innovation team had used an agent for real work. Adoption stays thin, and governance ends up covering activity that never shows up. Isaac also points out that most organizations aim AI at productivity and efficiency, and growth, customer experience and AI-enabled products get neglected. I’d call that a culture problem too. Teams chase whatever leadership measures. If hours saved is the only AI metric on the scorecard, nobody will put their curiosity into a new customer workflow. If you are setting 2027 budgets now, put a per-employee token line next to the license line, and tie part of it to one customer-facing outcome. drive.starcio.com/2026/10/ai… via @star_cio
1
4
146
Chris Thompson retweeted
You forgot @0xffdevs
My tier list of companies based on their tech blogs
1
9
833
Chris Thompson retweeted
Europe will have a hard time becoming Super Intelligence's bootloader if it does not clean up the mess it has created ASAP.
1
1
2
196
Chris Thompson retweeted
Studying some new papers! Paper Breakdown can now draw these interactive visualizers that really makes a difference. Copy-Paste Language Models (CPLMs) add a lightweight Copy-Paste (CP) head next to the usual LM head, which it uses to score past tokens with query-key attention and directly copy the best-matching token instead of decoding it from vocab.
2
5
57
1,909
Chris Thompson retweeted
what DeepSeek just managed with v4.1-flash-1017 is incredible the 552B MoE model now beats opus 5 on DeepSWE and Automation-Bench while costing just $1.20/M output tokens ($0.60 off-peak) over 20x cheaper than opus 5 i still don't understand how they squeezed this much performance out of the same architecture
🚀 DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is here! Stronger benchmark performance, faster task completion, and shorter outputs than the previous version—a Pareto improvement in performance and cost. Now live on our website, app, and API. 🛠️ Optimized for @DeepSeekHarness, Tencent CodeBuddy, WorkBuddy, and more. Upgrade to DeepSeek Harness v0.2.1-rc.1 or later for the best experience with the new model. 1/4
14
23
5
190
20,126
Chris Thompson retweeted
In the MiMo-V2 paper, they describe how they let an agent choose which trajectories to reward with positive RL advantage
1
5
41
2,013
Chris Thompson retweeted
The AI trade might be facing its biggest reality check yet. The latest All-In Podcast episode is digging into the cracks, and the numbers around CoreWeave are getting hard to ignore. Here’s what they’re breaking down: → CoreWeave’s $50B debt crunch: Bond yields >15% and CDS pricing signal distress. Will AI infrastructure become too expensive to finance? → AI vs. software economics: If AI makes software cheap to build, who survives and where does value concentrate? → Anthropic IPO watch: Mixed sentiment around valuation, fundraising, and whether expectations are overheated. → Next AI risk: Self-replicating models, safety warnings, and Bill Gates’ more cautious stance. Ben Horowitz joins the Besties to unpack it all. The bigger question is whether AI demand alone can justify the enormous cost of building the infrastructure behind it. Watch the full episode before making your next AI bet. The difference between the AI winners and losers might come down to what happens next.
12
20
1
171
14,927
Chris Thompson retweeted
Most AI agents are trapped in a chat window. The next generation will work while you're away. Lee Robinson, an ML engineer at SpaceX, just broke down how always-on agents like Grok Bot work in his Stanford CS146S lecture. Here's what makes them different: → Dedicated cloud computers → Persistent memory and files → Event-triggered execution → Dynamic tool use → Sub-agent delegation → Context engineering → Selective notifications The key shift is simple. AI is moving from answering prompts to managing ongoing tasks. These agents can run in the background, pick up events, work through tasks, and notify you when necessary. No constant prompting. No need to keep a chat open. Want to understand the architecture behind proactive AI agents? Watch Lee's full Stanford lecture below.
25
19
2
184
9,304
Pleased to share my latest reseach collaboration “Moral Missions: Sustaining Responsible Practice by Surfacing Practitioner Moral Decision-Making Procedures” Our work was published and presented at the 2026 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (AIES)!
2
2
14
390
Cyber-capable AI should start isolated. Network access should require enforceable containment, with failures documented and shared. A model's instructions are not a firewall. Security boundaries must exist outside the agent.
406 researchers, including Yoshua Bengio, Geoffrey Hinton, Stuart Russell and Ron Rivest, signed an open letter today. They want cyber-capable AI models airgapped by default until safer ways to give them internet access are standardized. For models that need outside access, they propose an international body, built with governments and AI and security experts, that would standardize containment practices and track failures, with breaches reported to it and eventually made public.
1
15
TrustOps for Disinformation Security has both a very high mass and long range of 6-8years as predicted by Gartner. Gartner argues that it will be separate from Cybersecurity or Governance, Risk and Compliance. Also see a digital polygraph there. Read more about the definition and see @aiseerco mentioned with link to paywalled details below. ⤵️
3
8
2
12
1,342
Chris Thompson retweeted
This was all a simple, silly misunderstanding. You see, it’s not take OR pay, it’s take NOR pay! Oh well, these mistakes happen. Enjoy your chips you will never plug in.
This is the problem with letting your industry get dominated by bullshit numbers and projections untethered from reality - when a big, real number pops up (Anthropic has $413bn in non-cancellable commitments) it’s impossible to reconcile with your already flawed logic
2
8
1
57
4,689
Chris Thompson retweeted
Come by to hang out and talk shop with everyone building in AI. We've got a great lineup of speakers and follks attending :)
Google DeepMind, Kaggle and Zapier are partnering up to host a first-of-its kind Bench Summit for benchmark creators on October 28th in San Francisco. We’d love for you to be there! Register your interest to attend and/or speak here! rsvp.withgoogle.com/events/b… Join me + leaders across @GoogleDeepMind, @kaggle, @zapier (and many more industry leading companies)! Including @OfficialLoganK , @osanseviero , @ivanleomk , @DynamicWebPaige & more!
5
2
44
3,285
Chris Thompson retweeted
Unitree Robotics CEO Wang Xingxing: "GPT-6 is already showing 'very good' results across multiple robots, and the remaining barriers to mass deployment could be solved within the next few years" i don't think there's any doubt about how incredible Astra's emergent abilities are
Unitree CEO Wang Xingxing recently said that GPT-7 could solve the challenges of embodied AI entirely and that he had made a mistake by not taking AI seriously enough. Quote: “We’ve put it (GPT-6) on various robots and tested it across a range of tasks, and the results have actually been very good. Our company and other robotics companies are already running pilot deployments in factories. To achieve large-scale adoption, though, both generalization and efficiency still need to improve further. But I think these challenges could very well be resolved over the next few years. My faith in AI grows stronger every year. The biggest mistake I’ve made over the past decade or so has been not believing in AI enough. Deployment in commercial services may happen even faster than in industrial settings.”
11
15
2
126
10,019
Chris Thompson retweeted
Two years ago, we introduced Video Prediction Policy (VPP), one of the first video-based generalist robot policies. Today, we’re introducing VPP2: predict better, act better Project Page: robert-gyj.github.io/video-p… Code: github.com/roboterax/video-p… A thread🧵 on how and why we do it.
17
24
3
145
7,888
This is a playbook worth studying if you’re building with coding agents. A guide to building a Jev harness breaks down how the right setup can deliver: → Up to 200x faster execution → Up to 400x lower costs The model isn’t always the bottleneck. The harness around it can make a massive difference in both speed and cost. Here’s how to put this into practice: 1. Rebuild your setup Give the PDF and the article below to Claude Code or Codex. Ask it to redesign your agent workflow around Jev. 2. Pick your most expensive workflow Find the agent task your team spends the most money running. Try rebuilding it in one evening. 3. Show the results Compare the before-and-after latency, token usage, and cost. Bring the numbers to your manager. One evening of harness engineering could save your team a serious amount of money and give you a system most teams haven’t even thought to build.
7
39
156
14,549
Chris Thompson retweeted
idk what to tell you we've been cooking with amazing labs let's go
October will be a releaseful month @huggingface
3
2
2
73
5,060
Chris Thompson retweeted
I think proprietary observation will beat proprietary data in more businesses than one might expect. AI makes analysing information cheaper. But someone still has to notice what’s worth recording in the first place. Spend an afternoon watching someone do their job and you’ll find things that never appear in a market report: - The employee copying an error into a team chat because the software offers no way to resolve it. - The sales rep rewriting every quote because the pricing tool doesn’t reflect how deals actually get done. - The new hire learning the real process by watching a colleague because nobody ever wrote it down. Each of these tells you something about where the software falls short and what people have to do to make the business work anyway. That’s why I think fieldwork becomes more valuable as AI improves. Founders who sit beside operators, follow a task from beginning to end, and ask why someone keeps switching between five windows will discover opportunities that a market summary misses. One observation won’t give you a lasting advantage. Staying close to the work can. You learn which exceptions matter, why previous fixes failed, and what people will actually use. Competitors can look at your product and ask AI to build something similar. It’s much harder to prompt their way into understanding a problem nobody has thought to describe.
Technical moats are mostly over at this point. If you’re building something that is meant to be durable, the only moats now are: • Proprietary data • Network effects • A physical component
9
21
3
78
15,020
Chris Thompson retweeted
If you're training with TRL, you should really upgrade to v1.15. Our new Triton kernel scales SFT/RL to >100k tokens on the same GPU 🔥
10
16
93
10,207