Chalitha Widusahan (@ChalithaWi) header
Chalitha Widusahan (@ChalithaWi) profile picture

Computing student @ SLIIT · Exploring AI & Blockchain · Freelancer & Aspiring founder

Sri Lanka
Joined June 2025
Photo by Chalitha Widusahan (@ChalithaWi)Photo by Chalitha Widusahan (@ChalithaWi)Photo by Chalitha Widusahan (@ChalithaWi)Photo by Chalitha Widusahan (@ChalithaWi)Photo by Chalitha Widusahan (@ChalithaWi)Photo by Chalitha Widusahan (@ChalithaWi)Photo by Chalitha Widusahan (@ChalithaWi)Photo by Chalitha Widusahan (@ChalithaWi)Photo by Chalitha Widusahan (@ChalithaWi)Photo by Chalitha Widusahan (@ChalithaWi)
Today I launched the beta for Scout 🤖 If you’re an AI automation freelancer or even an automation agency - you know the drill: client acquisition takes hours. Scout automates the entire flow: • You input niche, location & business size • Scout finds & researches high-intent leads • Generates a custom sample automation mockup • Drafts a personalized outreach email • Brings it to you for a 1-click review & send I’m opening up the beta to a few freelancers and agencies to use Scout 100% free in exchange for honest feedback. Want early access? Comment below and I’ll send you a DM! 👇
2
12
737
MIT teaching coding agents alongside shell, git and debugging makes sense to me those arent things you stop needing because an agent can run the commands you still need to know what it changed and how to undo it
MIT just released the 2026 edition of The Missing Semester, and it now includes Coding Agents. The entire course is free, with lecture notes, exercises, and YouTube videos. It's a great complement to learning how to code. It covers the practical tools and skills that programming courses often skip. It starts with Shell, Git, debugging, and profiling, then moves into shipping software, code quality, and AI coding tools like Claude Code, Codex, MCP, and Skills. Definitely worth checking out if you're a developer.
1
3
58
I build most of my stuff with AI and i think this is the part you cant hand off you still have to decide whats worth keeping, whats confusing, and whats just bad A working app isnt automatically a good app
designers say vibe coding kills craft engineers say vibe coding kills codebases honestly from both sides its the same problem. people skipping the part where you decide what good looks like
1
2
90
The best AI demo would be someone coming back a month later and showing what they still use not what looked impressive on launch day what actually stuck!
2
5
137
java trap: these compare objects, not numbers java guarantees shared boxed objects for these constant values from -128 to 127 outside that range, caching can vary. dont build value comparisons around it use .equals() for Integer values, or compare primitive ints. handle nulls before unboxing
1
50
X algorithm update just dropped! According to this, now the X algo favors "Early likes + dwell time" This prolly explains why my posts since yesterday was getting low impressions.. But reading the comments of this post, one thing stood out: visual creators (art, photography, media) are getting absolute collateral damage. Favoring long-text read time screws over visual posts. Nobody wants to write a 500-word essay just to post a simple photo.
X AI ALGORITHM UPDATE 🚨 X updated their open source algorithm yesterday and the early likes matter even more now. Small accounts should focus on: writing posts people hit like on and read till the end (so write to be read) tl;dr: - X's open source code got new scores on Nov 5, the first change in 3 weeks - likes: 0.66 → 0.708 (highest yet) - time spent on a post: 0.006 → 0.0075 - tapping into a post: 0.3 → 0.274 - opening a video: 0.02 → 0 - new rule: AI replies may get flagged under big accounts as "llm slop" and may not reach the person's notifications lesson learned: a tap isn't the win anymore. Someone staying and liking is. full details: - The new numbers Up: likes 0.66 → 0.708, time spent on a post 0.006 → 0.0075, shares 2 → 2.118. Down: tapping into a post 0.3 → 0.274, staying 10+ seconds after a tap 0.4 → 0.385, opening a video 0.02 → 0. "Not interested" got a bit harsher, -52.27 → -53.07. Copy link, replies, quotes, DM shares and follows didn't move. X didn't explain any of this. It's just what the code says now. (I check the open source algo daily with Claude and share updates with you) - Look at where this has gone in a month In early October a like was worth 0.5. Now it's 0.708. Time spent was 0.004. Now it's 0.0075, nearly double. A tap was 0.3 and it's going down. Every change points the same way. X keeps paying more for people who stay. - Why that matters if you're small My read: you can't win on big numbers, but you can win on the people who do see your post. If they stay and like it, that counts for more today than it did last week. And those early likes also decide which new post gets the extra push. - Video and your profile X also switched on two new guesses in its ranking: how long someone keeps watching after they open a video, and how long they spend on a profile after tapping it. I can't tell you what those are worth. The only file that lists them is out of date, so I won't guess a number. My read: opening a video dropped to 0 the same day because X cares more about people who keep watching. So make the first seconds count, and make your profile worth sticking around on. - A new rule for replies under big accounts X runs an AI check on replies under accounts with over 250K followers. Flagged replies can get a label that lasts 14 to 30 days. One of the flags is literally called "llm slop" (AI slop, as I read it). That part isn't new. This is: X's rules now say a labeled reply or mention doesn't reach the person's notifications unless they follow you. Grey badge accounts and accounts X rates as highly credible skip this label. Small accounts get no such pass. I can see the rule, I can't see if every notification goes through it yet. Either way, write your own replies. - What didn't change Your new posts still get their extra push in the first 2 hours and first 200 views, and they still don't get cut first. Here's a recap of what you should be doing: - likes just hit 0.708, the most they've ever been worth - each second someone spends on your post is worth 25% more than last week - staying 10+ seconds after a tap earns 0.385 on top of the tap - reply in your own words, under big accounts especially - make your profile worth a visit, X now guesses how long people spend there - for video, hold attention early, just getting the open now scores 0 - being read to the end also helps X find you new readers - originals from accounts below 50K can jump to around spot 16 - early viewers liking it is what wins that lift - your first 2 hours and 200 views are the window, so publish when your people are online - the biggest single number is still 20, for someone copying your link - quotes, DM shares and replies earn 5 apiece - back and forth between mutuals is worth 20, so follow back your regulars - strangers only get shown your originals - the 1st like and the 32nd like each open another route to new people - a second post of yours in the same feed drops to 62%, so make one count - the video lists want clips over 10 seconds - +4 when a post is likely to earn you a new follower - your pinned post can affect the whole account, so take a look at it What you should NOT be doing: - pasting AI replies under big accounts, "llm slop" is a real flag at X - copy-paste replies, a duplicate label means they never get notified - chasing the tap, it's down to 0.274 and falling - off-topic posts, one likely "not interested" costs -53.07 - a video that only gets opened earns nothing for the open - publishing at 3am burns your 2 hour window - relying on replies and reposts to reach new people, they stay with your followers - getting an insult label, non-followers won't see that post at all - low quality and misinfo labels bring a warning, and non-followers can't like or share - adult media in 3 of your last 5 posts gets the whole account labeled - X rechecks videos for hidden content at 64 and 512 likes - piling your replies under a big account's post can sink your own score - one label on the account and non-followers stop seeing you - a link to a badly rated site in your pinned post risks a 7 day label - reusing your own wording word for word risks the copypasta flag - pairing a low quality link with tags of strangers looks like spam to X - engagement bait gets labeled no matter how big you are - posting several in a row, they fight each other for the same feed - hashtag stuffing does nothing - counting on bookmarks, they're worth 0 - expecting For You to show a post past 48 hours
3
56
10 days of trying trading with Grok @bot , here are the results! 👇 I recently saw many posts on X saying how they created an agent to do trading for them and how they are stacking up profits. Those posts even had videos of fancy dashboards updating almost every few seconds with a green "+x profit" (x is a variable i used here) They looked very real, infact too good to be true. So I created my own grok bot to to trade on my own account (Demo account - didnt wanna risk real money for something i just wanted to test). and here are the results, Started with a baseline balance of $183,016.01 USDT After 10 days the demo account balance was down to $181,425.46 USDT That is a LOSS of a $1,590.55 USDT There were some green days, but also some red days. I wanted to see if the online hype about making hundreds of thousands of dollars in profit by using agents for trading was true or not. What do you think, was my test a failure? Do you think the hype out there for this specific thing is just pure ragebait hype? If there's anyone who has done this and got a better result, please let me know aswell!
1
2
62
Giving a coding agent your logged-in browser changes the risk, not just the convenience It can reach accounts youre already signed into I think id start with a separate browser profile Would you give it your everyday session?
2
2
99
Giving an LLM the answer doesnt mean it will use it! In the 2023 "lost in the middle" study, GPT-3.5 got 20 docs, one containing the answer. accuracy: answer in doc 1: 75.8% answer in doc 10: 53.8% no docs: 56.1% burying the answer was worse than giving it nothing
2
32
The scary part of learning in public isnt the posting, its being wrong in front of people who actually know the stuff I reply to a lot of founders and engineers on here. every reply has a real chance that someone way more experienced says “thats not how it works” I think thats kind of the point though. A lecture never corrects you in public, but it also never tells you what people building real things actually think being wrong here costs a bit of pride. being wrong later probably costs a lot more
2
3
71
Models building you a custom spaced repetition app sounds almost too useful I keep wondering if people would actually stick with the one it made, or bounce back to anki after a week maybe the tailored explanations for the stuff you keep missing is the real unlock though
The models are very good at creating custom spaced repetition apps with algorithms adapted to you and the problem domain ("review my learning and improve the efficiency of your scheduler") plus tailored explanations for anything that you consistently get wrong.
3
4
265
Almost 200 followers and i never actually introduced myself! I'm Chalitha, studying computing in sri lanka what i do on here: Vibe code small things with AI tools Learn the cs underneath so i actually understand what it writes Reply way too much Built 2 very cool projects and launched them as startups - Failed. But learnt a ton, and planning to come back stronger again very soon! i joined my first hackathon as a total beginner. still kinda feel like that, just with better tools. (actually i am a one time hackathon winner, plus 2 other hackathons i participated to but unfortunately couldnt win) If you're building with AI (or even building AI itself 🙃), say Hi, would love to connect!
3
4
115
me: "repeat back what i just said" 1B model: "i am groot" me: "great, now fix the bug" 1B model: *deletes the whole repo* 💀 (Watched this for like 3 times on loop - LOL 😂)
Me explaining the task to a 1B model:
1
6
168
The musical chairs between the top labs continues one day youre shipping claude code, next day youre leading openai core products i think the real race might be less about the next model and more about who turns these things into products people actually trust
Some news: I’m joining OpenAI to lead product management for Core Products! I have a lot of respect for OpenAI for showing the world that scaling works, for bringing AI to over a billion people, and for believing great products are core to the mission. I’m excited to work with @thsottiaux, an incredible PM team, and everyone across OpenAI. Together, we’ll build agents that have your back and your team’s, and keep you in control, so you get more time for the people and work you love. Lots to learn, and lots to build. Please keep your feedback coming!
2
5
154
Why do you think grok @bot is allowed to take calls, but not sales calls? 🤔
1
48
We really went from “AI can write my homework” to “AI can design the hardware.” At this rate I’m just going to ask it to build my entire degree 😭
ChatGPT and Codex are helping engineers build for the physical world. We’re sharing our progress across mechanical design, electrical engineering, and simulation—from helping our hardware teams iterate faster to testing new workflows with industry collaborators.
1
2
105
Is there anyone who got accepted to the claude ambassador program? If so how did your CV look like? Any tips for what to improve when re-applying next time?
Officially rejected from the @AnthropicAI 's @claudeai campus ambassador program. But do we give up? Hell nah, I'll re-apply next time with a better portofolio!
1
77
How do you go viral on X? Is it just random luck? or is there something strategic/Intentional behind it?
2
43
claude code isnt ruining anyone financially. its ruining finishing starting something new costs one prompt now. finishing still costs the same boring week it always did i think thats the real trap. maybe one shipped thing beats ten half built ones
give a man a fish and you feed him for a day teach a man to Claude Code and you financially ruin him with distracting side projects for the rest of his life
1
1
70
Nobody told me @X would be a full time job! 😂 It's been a few weeks since i started taking X seriously, and honestly you cant blame it. after a while, it becomes almost addictive to read, and comment on posts in here. The community is amazing, the people are helpful and i just love it!
1
22