Revolutionary Thinker, Human Rights Defender
Nairobi, Kenya
Joined June 2016
- Tweets5.8K
- Following1.1K
- Followers1.2K
- Likes8.3K
Chairman Muthusi retweeted
Iran clearly suffered a climate war before the wars of the last two years. Since Iranian forces destroyed the radars in the region, the rain has returned, and not just a little, but abundantly.
People will tell me I’m a conspiracy theorist. Come here, I’m going to tell you a story about how the empire used the weather to achieve its ends.
The Americans made a profession of using climate-manipulation methods in wars.
Operation Popeye in Vietnam at the time used chemical methods.
Which aimed to artificially prolong the monsoon period in order to make the Ho Chi Minh Trail impassable, flood the supply routes, and slow down the Vietnamese troops.
Let’s go back to Iran. You have a country that was surrounded by American bases. These American bases are equipped with extremely powerful radars capable of sending waves into different layers of the atmosphere.
Iran hit a whole series of American radar stations in the zone that were spread all along the arc along which the clouds that normally supply Iran with drinking water move.
Since the war broke out, precipitation has been excessive, with dams and reservoirs that are well above average, something that hadn’t happened for 50 years.
By crushing the radars in the region, Iran once again gained access to water and rain.
Yes, the Americans use every low blow when they want to subjugate you.
I imagine many Iranians thought this was a conspiracy theory before these wars, but the fact is there, you see a completely different climate since the radars were destroyed.
I’m telling you, they used the climate against you for many years.
What the Americans hadn’t foreseen is that the nation of Imam Hussein fights even when it is thirsty.
That’s why Iran is unbeatable.
Chairman Muthusi retweeted
LES 100 ÉCOLES DE PENSÉE : LES 7 SAGES CHINOIS QUI GOUVERNENT ENCORE LE MONDE
On croit que la Chine d'aujourd'hui, c'est le communisme. C'est faux.
La Chine d'aujourd'hui, c'est 7 philosophes qui se disputent depuis 2500 ans dans la tête de chaque Chinois. Et sans le savoir, ils gouvernent aussi ton téléphone, ton business, ta façon de penser.
Il y a 2500 ans, en Chine, c'est le chaos. Les royaumes se font la guerre. C'est ce qu'on appelle les 100 Écoles de Pensée. C'est comme Athènes, mais en Chine.
Voici les 7 qui ont gagné :
1. CONFUCIUS - L'ORDRE PAR LA MORALE
Pour lui, le chaos vient du fait que chacun a oublié son rôle. Le père doit protéger, le fils doit respecter, le dirigeant doit être juste.
Sa phrase : "Quand le dirigeant est juste, le peuple le suit sans qu'on le lui ordonne."
C'est lui qui a créé la Chine du respect, de l'éducation, de la discipline. Singapour, Corée, Japon ont bâti leur miracle économique sur lui.
2. LAOZI - LE CONTRAIRE DE CONFUCIUS
Laozi dit : "C'est justement vos règles qui ont créé le chaos."
Il écrit un petit livre de 5000 mots, le Tao Te Ching, le livre le plus traduit au monde après la Bible.
Son idée : ne force pas. Sois comme l'eau. L'eau ne casse pas la pierre, elle la contourne et elle finit par la percer. C'est le Wu Wei, agir sans forcer.
Steve Jobs dormait avec ce livre sur sa table de nuit. Tout le "lâcher-prise", le "flow", la méditation, ça vient de lui.
3. ZHUANGZI - LA LIBERTÉ ABSOLUE
C'est le disciple fou de Laozi.
Il rêve qu'il est un papillon. Il se réveille et il se demande : "Est-ce que je suis Zhuangzi qui a rêvé qu'il était un papillon, ou est-ce que je suis un papillon qui rêve qu'il est Zhuangzi ?"
Pour lui, tout est relatif. Le bien, le mal, le grand, le petit, ça dépend de ton point de vue. La vraie sagesse, c'est de ne pas s'attacher à ses certitudes.
C'est le philosophe des artistes, des rebelles, de ceux qui refusent de servir un pouvoir corrompu.
4. SUN TZU - GAGNER SANS SE BATTRE
Tout le monde connaît L'Art de la Guerre. Personne ne l'a compris.
Ce n'est pas un livre pour faire la guerre. C'est un livre pour l'ÉVITER.
Sa phrase : "Le meilleur général est celui qui gagne sans jamais avoir à se battre."
Si tu dois te battre, c'est que tu as déjà perdu. Il faut gagner par l'information, la patience, la psychologie.
Aujourd'hui, il est enseigné dans toutes les écoles de business, dans l'armée américaine, dans la Silicon Valley. Quand un PDG dit "connais-toi, connais ton concurrent", c'est Sun Tzu.
5. MENCIUS - LE PEUPLE EST PLUS IMPORTANT QUE LE ROI
C'est le successeur de Confucius, mais beaucoup plus dangereux.
Il dit : "Le peuple est ce qu'il y a de plus important dans un pays. Après vient la terre. Le roi est le moins important."
Si le roi est un tyran, le peuple a le droit de le renverser. C'est la première théorie du droit de révolte, 2000 ans avant la Révolution française.
6. HAN FEIZI - LA LOI, PAS LA MORALE
L'anti-Confucius total.
Il dit : "Arrêtez de parler de vertu. Les hommes sont égoïstes. Ils ne respectent que deux choses : la récompense et la punition."
Il ne faut pas compter sur un bon roi. Il faut des lois claires, dures, pour tout le monde.
C'est lui qui a inspiré le premier empereur de Chine, celui qui a brûlé les livres de Confucius et unifié la Chine par la force.
7. MOZI - L'AMOUR UNIVERSEL
Le plus oublié, mais le plus moderne.
Il dit : "Pourquoi aimer d'abord sa famille, ensuite son village ? Il faut aimer tout le monde de la même façon."
Et arrêtez de gaspiller l'argent dans les cérémonies, les tombes de luxe, les guerres. Investissez dans ce qui aide le peuple : agriculture, machines, écoles.
ALORS, C'EST QUOI LA PHILOSOPHIE CHINOISE AU FOND ?
C'est une philosophie PRATIQUE. Pas abstraite.
La Chine d'aujourd'hui, c'est le mélange de tout ça. Confucéenne pour la famille, taoïste pour la patience, légiste pour le contrôle, Sun Tzu pour la guerre sans guerre.
Chairman Muthusi retweeted
Decolonizing your mind and regaining your Superiority status as an African is the best thing that can happen to you in this generation
It's worth more than gold
If you're there yet congrats
Imagine still walking with those malware in your skull,esp the fear of afterlife Hell😂
Chairman Muthusi retweeted
On social media, you don't choose a narrative. The narrative chooses you, if you don't have a backbone.
This sentence comes from 3 ideas:
1.Marshall McLuhan: "We shape our tools, and thereafter our tools shape us."
2.Noam Chomsky: Manufacturing consent. They don't tell you what to think, they give you a menu of allowed opinions.
3. The Stoics: If you don't have fixed principles before the battle, you run away with the crowd.
That's why without a backbone, you don't choose your ideas. They choose you.
Chairman Muthusi retweeted
COMMENT LA CHINE S'EST SORTIE DE LA COLONISATION RELIGIEUSE.
La Chine n'a pas seulement chassé les soldats étrangers. Elle a chassé les prêtres étrangers.
Et c'est ça qui a tout changé.
1. D'ABORD, ELLE A COMPRIS LE PIÈGE.
Pendant 100 ans, les missionnaires étrangers avaient un statut spécial en Chine.
Grâce aux Traités Inégaux, un missionnaire anglais ou français pouvait acheter une terre, construire une église, ouvrir une école, et personne n'avait le droit de le toucher. S'il avait un problème, c'était son consulat qui décidait. Pas la justice chinoise.
Pire : si un Chinois se convertissait, il ne payait plus les mêmes impôts. Il était protégé par la France ou l'Angleterre. Il devenait plus puissant que son propre chef de village.
La Chine a compris : tant que la religion venait de l'étranger, la Chine ne serait jamais libre. Même si elle chassait les soldats, les missionnaires resteraient pour contrôler les esprits.
2. ENSUITE, ELLE A COUPÉ LE CORDON.
En 1949, Mao proclame la République Populaire. En 1950, il lance les "Trois Autonomies" pour les églises chrétiennes. C'est le plan en 3 points :
Autonomie financière : Plus un centime venant de l'étranger. Une église chinoise doit vivre avec l'argent des Chinois. Si Rome ou Londres paie, Rome ou Londres commande. On coupe l'argent, on coupe la commande.
Autonomie administrative : Plus d'évêque nommé par Rome. Plus de pasteur envoyé depuis Londres. Les responsables de l'église doivent être des Chinois, choisis par des Chinois, en Chine.
Autonomie de prédication : Plus de doctrine importée. On prêche en chinois, pour des Chinois, dans la réalité chinoise. Pas pour défendre les intérêts de la France ou des États-Unis.
En 1951, Mao passe à l'acte. Il expulse plus de 5 000 missionnaires étrangers. Tous. Catholiques, protestants.
Il ferme les écoles des missionnaires. Il les nationalise. Il dit : "L'éducation de nos enfants, c'est à l'État chinois. Pas à une église étrangère."
Il ferme les hôpitaux des missionnaires. Il les nationalise. "La santé de nos enfants, c'est à nous."
En 2 ans, c'est fini. Plus de colonisation religieuse en Chine.
3. ELLE N'A PAS INTERDIT DE CROIRE. ELLE A INTERDIT D'OBÉIR À L'ÉTRANGER.
C'est important. La Chine n'a pas dit : "Il ne faut plus croire en Dieu."
Elle a dit : "Tu peux croire. Mais tu ne dois pas recevoir d'ordres de l'étranger."
Elle a créé des associations religieuses chinoises, dirigées par des Chinois. L'Association Patriotique Catholique. Autonomies pour les protestants. L'Association Islamique de Chine. L'Association Bouddhiste de Chine.
Le principe est simple : tu veux être catholique en Chine ? Tu es catholique chinois. Ton évêque est chinois. Ton argent est chinois. Ton chef n'est pas à Rome, il est à Pékin.
C'est radical. Mais c'est efficace. Parce que la religion ne devient plus un cheval de Troie pour l'étranger.
4. ET ELLE A REMPLACÉ PAR SA PROPRE CULTURE.
La Chine n'a pas laissé un vide. Elle a remis en avant le confucianisme, le bouddhisme chinois, le taoïsme. Sa propre philosophie. Sa propre morale.
Elle a dit à ses enfants : "Tu n'as pas besoin d'aller chercher ta dignité à Rome ou à Londres. Ta dignité, elle est ici. Dans ton histoire de 5 000 ans. Dans tes ancêtres. Dans ta culture."
Elle a appris à ses enfants à être fiers d'être Chinois avant d'être croyants d'une religion étrangère.
Résultat ?
En 70 ans, la Chine est passée de pays colonisé, divisé, humilié, à deuxième puissance mondiale. Sans missionnaires pour lui dire quoi penser. Sans églises étrangères pour contrôler ses écoles.
LA LEÇON POUR L'AFRIQUE, C'EST LA MÊME.
Tant que notre religion sera financée et dirigée depuis l'étranger, nous ne serons jamais vraiment indépendants. Même avec un drapeau. Même avec un président noir.
La Chine l'a compris en 1949 : la liberté ne commence pas avec l'armée. Elle commence avec l'esprit.
Si tu contrôles l'école, tu contrôles l'avenir. Si tu contrôles la religion, tu contrôles l'âme.
Chairman Muthusi retweeted
I tell the people that Kenya’s government is a machine that was formed to extract. That is why we are taxed, oppressed, murdered and impoverished by the same government that arrived after the colonisers. We are not an independent nation. Only a revolution can heal this nation. But our education system was cooked up to make sure we would remain slaves to this machine.The history that was never taught is the history that still binds the household to the extraction. The philosophy that was never introduced is the philosophy that would have named the machine for what it is. The young who can recite the levy but cannot name the men who designed it are the young who will vote for the next face of the same order.
Chairman Muthusi retweeted
Tanzania’s Western-Backed “Opposition” Leader Found Guilty Of Inciting Treason
A Tanzanian High Court has convicted Western-backed "opposition" leader, Tundu Lissu, of inciting treason. Lissu leads the CHADEMA party, which carried out a failed regime change operation against the current Tanzanian government on October 29, 2025. He is also a member of the Germany-based, right-wing NGO, the International Democracy Union (IDU).
On October 1, 2026, the European Parliament nominated Lissu for the 2026 “Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought”. Described as the “highest tribute paid by the European Union to human rights work”, the award is effectively a pat on the back for those in the Global South who serve Western political interests.
The nomination, as well as the sustained Western media slander campaign against Tanzania amid its deepening strategic ties with China and Russia, offer a chilling insight into the external forces behind the East African country’s “opposition” movement.
In its debut documentary, ‘What Happened On October 29?’, The Spearhead sheds an investigative light on these nefarious external forces and their local pawns. You can watch the documentary on our YouTube channel.
Word,
Most of the opposition leaders are puppets in waiting for the imperial west.
I have a genuine question for my African followers who are honest enough to answer.
Have you ever seen your local Russian, Chinese, Iranian or North Korean embassy arrange meetings with your country's opposition leader? Did you ever see a Russian diplomat meet with Raila Odinga? Or a Chinese diplomat meet with Peter Obi? Or a North Korean diplomat discussing state affairs with Nelson Chamisa? Maybe an Iranian diplomat discussing "investment" with Issa Tchiroma?
Why is it always diplomatic missions from Western Europe, USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand that pull this particular stunt? What is it about that specific demographic of diplomats that entitles them to blatantly interfere in their host country's local politics this way?
When was the last time you saw or heard from your local Russian or Chinese embassy? Do you even know the ambassadors' names? Yet why is your local US or UK ambassador almost a celebrity in your country? Why are they constantly roaming around poking their noses everywhere it doesn't concern them, and what gave them that right?
I really want you people to answer me.
4
365
Chairman Muthusi retweeted
Have you ever considered the possibility that China's merit based political system, that has produced the most rapid increase in living standards in human history, is actually a more advanced form of governance than performative, reality-show style elections?
Leave Africans to sort out Africa's challenges.
Your history in Libya gives us the best you can do.
As an American constitutional lawyer, I have personally litigated cases defending the rights to free expression and due process. These are fundamental principles of human liberty. For that reason, I am closely following the outcome of Tundu Lissu’s trial proceedings, and the broader implications for the rule of law.
25
Chairman Muthusi retweeted
Hoje fui recebido com muito carinho, emoção e esperança pelos trabalhadores e trabalhadoras do Palácio do Planalto.
Esse abraço renova a minha força e a minha fé. Seguimos juntos, com o coração cheio de gratidão e a certeza de que ainda temos muito a fazer pelo nosso povo e pelo Brasil.
Vamos em frente, com coragem, união e compromisso com o futuro do nosso país! ❤️🇧🇷
🎥 @ricardostuckert
Chairman Muthusi retweeted
These are not lies. They're buzzwords and spectacle. Kenyans love buzzwords. Kasongo's problem isn't that he uses them; it's that he gives the most ridiculous sounding ones. But politicians do the same thing every day, and Kenyans love it. Look at the best "performing" politicians whom we praise. It's those who do spectacle of hospitals and schools. Meanwhile we're exporting medical workers and not paying teachers.
This is why I said on Orinna's show that I don't assess political leadership by material projects. I assess it by direction, inspiration and clarity. No political leader in Kenya has that.
Chairman Muthusi retweeted
Jubilee Holdings announced this week that Dr Julius Kipngetich retires as Group CEO on 30 November, with Juan Cazarra taking over on the 1st of December 2026. Nearly nine years at the helm.
Which sends me back to my notes from September.
He was one of my lecturers at United States International University - Africa back in 1994 or 1995. On the 8th of September 2026 he opened the Kenya Teachers Sacco Association (KETSA) Annual CEOs' Workshop in Mombasa and told a room of SACCO chief executives:
"Saving and credit is a tired product. It is for Gen Xs and boomers."
He also mentioned that he planned to retire at the end of the year. None of us made much of it at the time. Two months on, it means what I sat through was one of the last big public keynotes of his tenure.
He did not spend it on Jubilee. Here is what he spent it on instead:
1/ Kenya saves about 12% of income. Uganda 23%, Tanzania 21%. Vision 2030 targeted 30% and we have never once reached it.
2/ The bigger drain is tax. He put the combined burden at roughly 40% of income, then made the more explicit point: at 40% Kenya should be a welfare state. Instead we pay again, privately, for security, water and school.
3/ Then there are dead assets - anything you own that pays you nothing. The rural home nobody lives in. The plot you are holding. Five acres of maize. "Food crop can never be a cash crop. Ever."
4/ Get out of bank fixed deposits. Banks pay you single digits, then lend the same money to government at double digits. "They keep quiet because they have to exploit somebody who is not clever enough to see they are being exploited."
5/ His hierarchy: SACCO first, then a money market fund, then Treasury bills and bonds, then infrastructure bonds - interest tax-free - then equities.
6/ On property: Kenyan real estate yields around 7%, government paper pays more, risk-free. "Have you ever seen a Jubilee Tower? You will never see one." He sits on the committee that says no.
7/ Retirement is where the money actually disappears. "A fence has no income." Then the most candid line of the day: "Most of our members, post-retirement, they never live more than 10 years."
8/ On governance he did not go lightly at all. "You move a primary school teacher, you bring them to a board which manages 30 billion. Nobody has trained them." Members keep the vote, he said — but elect for a different calibre.
9/ "Somebody has to bell the cat, and I wanted to say it openly today."
That last line reads very differently now. He knew he was leaving. He said it anyway — to a room that had no obligation to listen to him.
A CEO on his way out could have taken a victory lap. He chose to tell other people's chief executives that their core product is finished.
Asante sana, Dr Kipngetich. 30 years on, still learning from you!
Read The Blog Post: bit.ly/4ecip8N
#SACCO #Kenya #FinancialServices #KETSA #Jubilee #Leadership #PersonalFinance #Africa
@Kipngetichjk @JubileeGroupKE – at Nairobi, Kenya
Chairman Muthusi retweeted
5th column attacking the 6th column.
Translation: “the system” is attacking the “controlled opposition.”
Meaning: it is one message from the same system, sold as opposition / alternative views.
CIA agents can't stay undercover for long. This one has blown his own cover.
Assuming that only US can use nuclear weapons is absurd naivety.
Use a nuclear weapon and Washington DC will look like Tehran in minutes.
Remain logical or vaporize everything Tucker.
Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer.
Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war.
To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha.
The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people.
And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final.
We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it.
Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made.
They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making.
One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.
47