bd & growth marketer | @SafaryClub cohort 4 | take a chance
no two ways
Joined January 2016
- Tweets56.9K
- Following811
- Followers2.9K
- Likes27.6K
choko✰ retweeted
i still haven’t reached the threshold of 1k impression to secure a whitlist on @conso_xyz
let me give this another try...
never seen a founder that tags his token to a post like this dude. yet to see any post of his without mentioning the token. mehh
cook
stare at the screen all day / doom scroll
avoid bathing 1 - 2 days on numerous occasions
get rugged onchain
beat my meat
rinse and repeat for the past months now. up soon. 🤝🏾
🧘🏿
users are getting value for their time, money, and conviction on Hyperliquid.
the current market might look like a desert, but there are protocols that get you passive income with less effort.
@Kinetiq_xyz is rewarding its users with millions every month through yield and token buybacks.
since july 2025, @prjx_hl has averaged $415k to LPers every month to date. they recently gave out $1m to their community and still have $500k in usdc rewards to give out over the next year.
100% of swap fees go directly to veNEST stakers, and the numbers keep rising on @NestExchange.
there's always a bull market somewhere, and it's happening right where I just stated.
tl;dr: hyperliquid
choko✰ retweeted
Looking into $NEST, one of the leading MetaDEXs and liquidity layers on HyperEVM.
Nest uses a ve(3,3)-style model with two main participants:
Liquidity providers supply liquidity and earn weekly NEST emissions.
veNEST holders lock NEST for up to six months, receive 100% of protocol trading fees, earn voting incentives and decide which pools receive future emissions.
Protocols and LPs need veNEST votes to direct incentives toward their pools, while lockers receive the revenue generated by trading activity.
The numbers have improved significantly since the last time i mentioned it as well
about a $25M TVL
$591k++ in 30 day fees and holder revenue
Around $162K in holder revenue over the latest seven days
The strongest part of the model is that 100% of trading fees accrue to veNEST lockers. LPs receive emissions, but the actual fee revenue belongs to long-term token holders.
Nest also directs approximately 31% of revenue toward NEST buybacks every weekly epoch. This adds a recurring source of market demand funded by protocol activity rather than new token issuance.
Protocol revenue → weekly buybacks → NEST acquired → additional veNEST locking → lower circulating supply → larger share of future revenue captured by aligned holders.
Over the past 30 days, Nest generated approximately $592K in protocol revenue. With 31% directed toward NEST buybacks each weekly epoch, that represents roughly $183K of monthly buyback demand or approximately $43K per epoch funded entirely by real protocol activity.
The lock rate is now approximately 86% per epoch, which is unusually high for any DeFi token. This means the overwhelming majority of supply is choosing to remain locked for governance, fees and HYPE-aligned rewards rather than remaining liquid, suggesting that the APR is juicy enough to make the holders continue to lock their supply and stack rewards (as shown in the high lock rate every single epochs)
The HYPE Engine strengthens this further. It automatically manages voting and compounds rewards, using the value generated by its permanently locked veNEST position to acquire and distribute HYPE. Users can deposit veNEST into the HYPE Engine Vault for automated voting, NEST compounding and HYPE rewards.
This creates a strong flywheel:
More liquidity → better execution → more trading volume → more protocol fees → higher veNEST rewards → more NEST locked → less liquid supply → greater demand for voting power and emissions.
0x07c57E32a3C29D5659bda1d3EFC2E7BF004E3035
circulating marketcap is only 2.5M roughly atm
