You either die a shitcoiner, or live long enough to see yourself become the dev.

Joined August 2025
never fall for the psyops or "articles" proclaiming you have better odds at making money with casinos/lottery/sports betting, than you do with spot crypto, particularly memecoins. the propaganda is all paid for by Legacy Big Gambling. anyone in meme coins knows this innately. they can think of a dozen friends instantly, that made/are making money on memes, yet cant name a single person they know that routinely cleans house at a casino or has gotten rich off of sports bets. lottery winners are 1/millions. keep clicking and ignore the noise.
2
3
8
578
I still think its insane that the black swan event for the next billion dollar runner happened to be Trump renaming "AI" to "SI". I dont think anyone would have seen it coming tbh. RIP Artificial Inu; twas' a good run.
4
125
for anyone wondering how to actually prove or disprove tweets like these: 1. find a token from one of the aforementioned launchpads 2. go to the etherscan of said token 3. find the dev wallet (deployer) of said token 4. scroll back early on in the deployer's tx ledger to find a tx called "launch token" or "launch with" or something like that (its the tx where the token was created and deployed on the launchpad) 5. click on the [event] log for the creation transaction 6. find the instruction that modifies liquidity on a uniswap pool [ModifyLiquidity] specifically in that tx youre going to want to find "tickUpper". 7 the maximum tickUpper a uniswap v4 pool can have is 887272 - this allows a pool to be bought up closer towards infinity (or really just v higher numbers) and tries to spread the liquidity out as far as possible across that range. This is the tickUpper that tokens deployed from stockereum use in their code (they dont have the "lp bug") 8. the tickUpper setting for tokens that were deployed on Sender family pre the dev's recent patch announcement was 195800. What this means is that those LPs, for all tokens launched prior to the patch, are quite limited and concentrated. It would mean hypothetically that someone could one-shot the entire token supply out of the pool for roughly 99 eth. It also means that if outside players dont seed other pools with sizable amounts of the token supply in it, the chart stops moving at a certain point and you can only sell and not buy. 9. stockereum's contracts were deployed 23ish days ago. Sender family deployed theirs one week after that. IN CLOSING: dont just believe a tweet like this at face value it could result in you losing a LOT of money. DYOR and learn how to read chainstate and txs. (attaching screenshot of tweet in case they decide to delete it at a later date.) xitter.cf/prolpseprincess/status… Ps: im not an investor in either token. I'm just advocating that people try to be more transparent in the space and relay correct information.
Been digging into the Sender vs Stockthereum drama. The on-chain picture is pretty different from the narrative that's been going around on CT. The original complaint - $STOCKER called out $SEND for an LP issue. That part was partially real: early Sender launches were seeded so the curve ran out before infinity. Which is an easy enough fix, has happened before in the space and resolved easily. What Sender did about it - For $SEND , supply was manually added into the upper ranges and burned, so liquidity holds past that point. It appears a lot of the teams on legacy tokens also went out and added lp above the range to stabilize (check the chain). New launches were changed to seed correctly from the start. So the bug existed, and it got fixed on-chain. Kind of bullish. Now it gets funny - Compare Stockthereum's contracts to Sender's and they're built on the same code! They literally copied the sender code, plus they don't know how to fix the issue. What that means - So tokens launched on Stockthereum are hitting the same liquidity wall in the upper market cap range. As of today, I can't find any sign they've patched it. And $zip pool (their runner) has basically no tokens left when it ranges up. None that are revoked. TLDR The platform and metamoon spent so much time pointing at Sender's LP bug appears to be running a copy of the same code, BUG INCLUDED, without the fix. If you're holding tokens on Stockthereum, pull up the contract and check the LP ranges before you size up. Regards
1
1
1
1
506
this convo right here encapsulates why people aren't understanding why fomo is an existential threat to pump fun's business. fomo isn't JUST showing tokens launched through PF. fomo is making it IRRELEVANT where a token is launched. go look at the trending section of fomo rn, and you'll see what i mean hint: its NOT pf monopolizing the entire trend feed. Its tokens from any CHAIN, any LAUNCHPAD [big, big, BIG issue for pf] bonus points: go look at the trending feed on pf's mobile app. How does it differ from fomo's feed, anon? ;) xitter.cf/FabianoSolana/status/2…
lol I mean tokens traded on fomo are launched through pump fun its the same biz
2
436
i mean, i'm not saying your intern is doing a bad job here but do consider the political implications if you decide to include figures like trump in your memes. a meme at the expense of trump, right after Vlad goes to the whitehouse and is endorsed by trump, and with vlad endorsing and shilling Trump Accounts, might be viewed by people in the right-wing sector of the cashcat community as bearish. especially when you consider what the launch of trump coin did to memes on solana. and with rumors of a trump coin around the corner dropping on robinhood? yeah.... please dont poke the bears lol xitter.cf/cashcat_token/status/2…
1
4
575
trying to understand why the fee fud is only coming out now, after axiom / gmgn / trojan / bonk bot [etc] have been charging 1% or more for 2 years now. Heck, pf charges 1.25% pre bonding on all trades. yes 1% btw, means $50 on a $5000 trade lol if pf is paying people to fud FOMO fees, they need to be careful what they wish for. pf didnt magically rake in 500m+ in fees just on "good wishes and low fees!" xitter.cf/imperooterxbt/status/2…
Solana broccoli heads are paying 2020 eth gas prices on Solana to be exit liquidity on fomo. This market is a clown show.
1
283
frontrun.pro is the worst thing to have happened to scammers since 9/11, and i'm all here for it
4
297
quant friend sent me his thesis on white bull token: "He's not white, he's a jew. ngmi."
1
2
302
for anyone in the RH eco that's somehow STILL glazing Noxa, please watch this video: #cashcat #noxa #scandal tldr: no, noxa didn't redirect 100% of fees to token creators, this was a lie.
2
2
1
11
850
Major downside to the ansem token meta of "dev has 60% and its safe", is that it has opened up the door to many wannabe copycat tokens being able to get away with replicating the model, ie "dev has 60% and its okay, just buy it bro" ultimately, a ton of rugs are going to spawn with 60% held in a single wallet, people will buy thinking its just the norm and get brutally rugged. we will only return to normalcy once people stop buying these tokens, which might take a bit.
1
1
6
625
Being early to emergent trends is how wealth is generated. RWAs as a sector have been silently gaining ground, yet see close to 0 mentions on the timeline. It's a 20 billion dollar sector, and growing rapidly. 0 hype. 0 paid bull-posters. 0 news. Just rumors. As the saying goes: buy the rumors. Secure your $BAG.
22
14
2
37
1,271
xitter.cf/CatDevSupreme/status/2… Really funny seeing stockholm syndrome on Solana memecoins. I posted this thread in a community for a $barron coin that was launched by a rugger bot that just corners 99% of the supply, keeps pumping chart slowly, and then brutally rugs it in one clip. And so they remove me from the community. lol The community in there is ofc in utter denial that they were brutally rugged by a larp, and are siding with the token (the same token where the dev essentially just ran off with over 6 figs of their money btw) in the hopes that they can trick new investors into buying a dead coin with no dev, no credentials and no roadmap or substance whatsoever. You really can't save everyone, can you?
This Post is unavailable. Learn more
2
421
I'm trying to understand why, from the vast and immense trove of literature available to mankind and platform-appropriate quotes to choose from, pump fun decided to use this one in particular for their corporate website (see attached). (their corpo site: batoncorporation.com) For anyone wondering, the quote is from a now infamous western novel from the 80s. The book is riddled with depictions of graphic violence and sexual assault. In short, pioneers raping and pillaging the western frontier. So in other words, Pump.fun, who claim to be in the game of "driving innovation in memecoins [the western frontier]" through their pioneer platform, decided that of all the quotes they could have chosen from, from the trillions and trillions of possible literary entries in the libraries of mankind, that choosing one from this book was the ONLY correct choice. It just had to be from that book. They just couldn't resist, could they. Right @a1lon9? Or maybe it was an accidental blunder, and whomever put the page up should just get a lil' slap on the wrist. ...But nothing is an accident, is it anon?
7
6
14
449
Came here to say that, while I don't support vamp attacks, the narrative here is interesting because of the implications it has, should this take off. As you all know there's a power struggle between pump fun and bags fm rn, in terms of "which launchpad looks out for the best interests of its investors?" What I witnessed with the pump fun staff approving a CTO claim, only to claw it back was odd. And the circumstances and on-chain evidence around it were honestly quite disturbing. What honestly disturbed me the most though was whom they gave the CTO back to; hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of the token dumped, just in the last 2 days. All the fees claimed? Straight to solcasino (washer) or burner wallets. The on-chain behavior of the "dev" wallets also point to complete and utter abandonment of the project, ie selling off of supply and then buying and jeeting dozens upon dozens of other random disrelated tokens, even straight from the "Dev" wallet. Not to mention them literally sharing their PnL from the last couple days showing multiple six figures of tokens dumped. Like, they are so impervious to accountability that they'll literally show off their dead bodies in broad daylight. In other words the proclaimed "dev" that pump fun somehow deemed worthy of retaining the title not only was busy dumping the penguin coin to oblivion (or trying to), they frankly gave no shits and were busy trenching away and dumping other coins in the meantime as well. All of this is on chain, you don't need to have a PHD in rocket science to find the evidence and you don't need to believe what i'm saying. Go look for yourself. The guy who got scammed out of the CTO dmed, broken and tired. In debt and without a shred of hope. And to imagine that this could have been his salvation? Makes you wonder doesn't it? So honestly, i think it would be kinda fun if this token took off and made pump fun sweat a little. Don't you think? As Elon would say: "The most entertaining outcome is the most likely"
19
38
4
125
11,272