@CallShotX

Nation over Narrative. Anti-Left by Necessity.

Joined September 2026
FDR made Robert Post of the NYT wear a dunce cap and stand in the corner. FDR awarded John O’Donnell of New York Daily News a Nazi Iron Cross for aiding and abetting the Germans. Beyond the list of recent revocations of passes, there is a long history of Presidents punishing yellow journalism. The fundamental argument here is correct. The President is not required to speak to reporters at all. The press pool is a non-public, voluntarily act by the White House to give information directly to the public. Access to the President and White House is a privilege conditioned on sharing objective facts with the public. When those conditions are not met, privilege can be revoked. This is common sense. This cartel of for-profit Opinion & Editorial Entertainment Outlets are not journalist organizations. If they don’t want to report the news, then they should not be granted the privileges extended to journalists.
2
76
Call Shot retweeted
USA is one of a handful of countries that will tax your personal income ANYWHERE in the world but refuses to tax remittances.
So far this year, remittances to India from the US total about $74 billion. And $30+ billion to Mexico. IDK about you guys, but I’m pretty sick and tired of the US being used to support the damn world.
114
1,102
30
10,180
195,232
Being blocked for pointing out that slavery was a global practice, rather than a “white” invention is… something.
1
20
This is my favorite version of Trump. He does not care - he’s doing what is morally right and what is in the long term interest of the country rather than capitulate to the noise & TikTok trends like every single other politician that has sold us down the river for instant gratification.
President Trump certainly understood that the public probably wouldn't like it. He thought he had to do it regardless. I like having a President who doesn't conduct foreign policy on the basis of opinion polls alone. It's good for the country.
2
45
We are not running a serious country if publicly funded organizations and corporations using publicly owned airwaves can CENSOR our democratically elected government. Pull their funding. Pull their licenses. Do it now.
PBS News is a paid subscriber to the White House Press Pool. We join our news media colleagues in objection to the White House barring CNN, MS Now and Politico from their coverage from the White House. 1/2
14
The “censored free press” somehow is still reporting. Imagine that.
.@POTUS on the Fake News: "It's interesting because they said they were going to be boycott me — but they never boycott me, so I wasn't very worried about that. Look at all that press!" 🤣
1
39
As usual, people don’t even understand what is happening. The 5 corporations - ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox News, NBC - all share responsibility for broadcasting the television feed of the press pool. They rotate responsibility daily. There are still dozens of news outlets and independent journalists sitting in the press pool today. The press has access to the President and the White House. There is no “ban on the free press.” Of the 5 corporations, all except CNN use publicly owned over the air broadcasting for their content. All five are for profit corporations. CNN is operating as an Opinion & Editorial Entertainment outlet rather than a public press broadcaster. The White House has revoked their press pass due to their choice to not practice journalism and report the objective news. In response, the 5 corporations are exerting their cartel monopoly power over television broadcast of White House press events to remove the White House from public broadcast air waves. 4 of these corporations earn their profits off our publicly owned air waves. They do not own them. And they are weaponizing those airwaves to collude with each other to take the White House off the air. Entertainment opinion media corporations masquerading as journalism has no right to access the President or White House, while public broadcasters have an obligation to objectively report the news and share information from the government in exchange for their monopoly on publicly owned air waves. There should be an immediate move to remove their access to broadcast airwaves and grant it to competitors. Publicly owned infrastructure cannot be used by for profit corporations to act against the duly elected government. If they refuse to meet their commitments, take them off the air and let someone meet the obligation to serve the public.
6
Exactly correct across so many dimensions. The Epstein Files is the biggest example. The Twitter mob equivalent of the CooCluxClancy’s from TikTok.
The inevitable showdown is coming: those advocating for trial by Twitter and mob condemnation versus those who still believe in the Constitution and due process. A lot of people are going to find themselves questioning why they ever aligned with a class of hypocrites who pretended to support “liberty.” Pay very close attention to the defamation suits versus the deliberate and necessary due-process trials. We may accept your apology later. But I can’t guarantee it. Flag it. 🚩
22
“But but but gas prices” Literally the most successful Republican presidency in the modern era and alleged “conservatives” are crying about temporary gas prices & Jews Completely unserious.
.@VP: "We took on Big Pharma and drug prices are falling faster than they have fallen in 60 years. We banned Wall Street from buying up all of America's homes. And despite Democrat obstruction, we delivered No Tax on Tips, No Tax on Overtime, and No Tax on Social Security.
11
So, maga truckers are talking about having a strike on 10/1 because of diesel prices. They want trump to do price controls. The very people crying about communism and socialism want government control over the free market. Who's gonna tell them?
106
2,108
28
17,400
146,480
Any news outlet operating on public broadcast that refuses to air the President should have its license suspended immediately. You cannot censor the President on a publicly owned broadcast airwave. Access to the press pool is not censorship. Refusing to air the President is.
BREAKING: Outlets including FOX News, ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC, and others have collectively agreed to HALT coverage of President Trump after he banned CNN, MS Now, and Politico from the White House.
1
2
97
An inability to sit in the White House press room does not prevent an Op-Ed Commentary Outlet from publishing their opinions. There is zero censorship occurring. CNN is on the airwaves right now saying whatever they want.
“This morning, we notified the government that we are filing a lawsuit today to protect our First Amendment rights and defend the principle that the government does not decide what the press reports or publishes,” the three news organizations said in a joint statement on Monday. cnn.com/2026/09/21/politics/…
14
Call Shot retweeted
Democrats want to do this again but you're staying home because the Iran war gave you a sad
My phone just pinged me with an “on this day” memory from this day three years ago on 9/20/23. We were in Eagle Pass, TX and witnessed a mass illegal crossing of more than 4,000 illegal aliens crossing in one single spot in just two hours, leading to CBP having to shut down the nearby international bridges & ports of entry. @FoxNews was the only network there. The only resistance offered was Texas military & DPS assets which had placed razor wire at the edge of the river, but the Biden Border Patrol cut through it and in one infamous case, even used heavy machinery to lift it out of the way so the illegal aliens could proceed into the U.S. A complete free for all that day - and it would get even worse three months later in December 2023 when the illegal crossings reached the highest ever recorded in U.S. history with more than 11,000 in a single day.
58
387
6
2,955
43,177
Call Shot retweeted
Iran's ballistic missile program is just as much a reason for the Iran War as the nuclear weapons program, and what we're seeing play out confirms this reality Recently @PalmerLuckey, founder of Anduril, said: “China had provided Iran with manufacturing equipment and manufacturing expertise that had caused a steep curve upwards in their ballistic missile production capacity. They were only a few months into that production capacity. If you allowed them to continue that for even two years, they would build an arsenal that is so vast that we could never afford to take action. They could build nuclear weapons with impunity. They could strike U.S. or allied bases with impunity, and we just wouldn’t be able to do anything. We could not let the Iran situation turn into North Korea on steroids.” A few things have since become clear as the Iran War has now settled the the question of combat defined variables. We know that we have not been able to sufficiently neutralize their ballistic missile/drones to the point where they can't leverage attacks on energy and maritime transportation. Also, US interceptor levels are now critically low and production is insufficient to regenerate stocks What this means is that given a few more years, Iran would have had the means to produce enough missiles/drones, of increasingly greater range, to effectively hold the entire world hostage...and the North Korean model would have been replicated In some ways you could argue that the US waited too long to take action because Iran has already spread their tentacles far too wide to be easily contained It also creates a dilemma for the United States because a simple "deal" on nuclear development would not be sufficient to also curb Iran's conventional capabilities
Iran was trying to use the North Korean model to get a nuke: create sufficient conventional deterrence so you won’t be challenged in acquiring one (it’s called the Seoul Hostage Problem). This has been explained over and over since day one. Everyone claiming shifting goalposts or no imminent threat has been lying. The reason North Korea was allowed to get nukes is because Seoul (and its 10 million inhabitants) is within artillery and rocket range of North Korea. During the 1994 nuclear crisis, the Clinton administration seriously considered airstrikes on North Korea’s Yongbyon reactor but backed off precisely because of the artillery threat to Seoul. Iran was trying to accomplish the same by stockpiling missiles and drones which would have had the same deterrent effect. The proof is what Iran has been doing in the past month: attacking all its neighbors in order to pressure the US to stop attacking it Beyond this, they were building medium-range ballistic missiles that could reach Paris and London, meaning all of Europe could be held hostage as they built a nuclear bomb. The reason Iran has not built a nuclear weapon until now is not because it couldn’t, but because it knew it would be attacked and denied this capability. So by allowing them to continue developing this conventional deterrence, you would be allowing Iran to get a nuclear weapon. And unlike North Korea, Iran is led by an eschatological death cult Reagan saw nuclear mutually assured destruction (MAD) as both morally bankrupt (because of the innocent-body-count problem) and dangerously fragile because it assumed flawless rationality between adversaries…this means it only takes one irrational actor to destroy the world. Working backwards from the conclusion that Iran’s Islamist regime must never have a nuclear weapon, it was necessary for the US to attack Iran to deny it the conventional capacity to hold the entire eastern hemisphere hostage. Every European leader knows this and behind the scenes praises the US for this action. But they are cowards, held hostage by their own internal Muslim populations, and so adopt these ridiculous public positions. This was never about Israel. And if your argument is that Iran should be allowed to get a nuclear weapon then you are a fool and a traitor to western civilization…you’re a useful idiot
22
97
10
681
39,027
Call Shot retweeted
Good evening, Senator. “Big Oil” does not set the market price for gasoline and diesel. Prices are largely determined by crude oil futures, as well as refining costs and distribution. Taxes on fuel can also add a significant chunk to the price per gallon depending on the state you live in. Blue states have higher tax rates. That said, why are you outraged about gas and diesel prices? Isn’t this what you wanted to force a “green energy transition” to avert climate catastrophe? Or is your climate panic a grift too?
Average gas price: $4.48 Average diesel price: $6.50 2026 BIG OIL PROFITS: $125 billion ENOUGH. Congress must stop Big Oil from profiteering while Americans can’t afford to fill up their gas tanks.
47
452
14
2,291
35,339
Call Shot retweeted
The left is on average higher IQ than the right. Not by a lot, but enough that it's something they're proud of. As a result there's a protective status barrier around their ideas - if you disagree you get lumped in with the "dumb people." Many disastrous consequences follow.
How did Western societies come to convince some of their smartest and wealthiest inhabitants that castrating their children was “medicine”, was “lifesaving”, was “medically necessary”, was compassionate, was high status? Do not underestimate the importance of this question.
149
14
4
183
27,950
The actual Jew running our country and kicking the shit out of communists & globalists.
Stephen Miller delivered the greatest on-air masterclass on why you have to vote Republican in the midterms “Democrats’ policies aren’t just wrong; their policies are evil.” “You cannot sit on the sidelines when we are trying to save this country from an agenda that is sinister and wicked and morally indefensible.” Republicans are delivering results: a thriving country under President Trump, secured borders, falling crime, and an America First agenda. The second Democrats take power, they will open the borders again and the mass invasion of our country will continue. This is a fight for the future of our nation. Vote.
26
The dumbest thing about voting Dem in November because of gas prices (aside from the fact you'd be voting people that hate you back into power for something temporary) is that a blue wave wouldn't even lower gas prices, it'd actually increase them and probably quite significantly at that. The reason? Iran is banking on the idea that Trump and Republicans will suffer major setbacks in Congress which would strengthen their hand in the conflict and negotiations while significantly weakening ours. For example, say if the Dems gain both chambers, they can then sail a war powers act through Congress, Trump could veto it and he likely would but considering the political situation in this scenario there would more than likely be enough votes to override his veto, thereby seceding all possible military leverage we have over the Iranians. Thus meaning the Iranians would be free to exercise near complete control over the strait and possibly even the red sea through their Houthi proxy. This would in turn lead to a skyrocketing of oil prices which will drive up gas prices even more here and in Europe, and it would remain fixed at those elevated levels as the Iranians deliberately stall and attack shipping to inflict economic pain as a way to extract concessions from the US. All this to say, if you want lower gas prices the worst possible thing you could do is needlessly reward the Democrats with your vote, you won't be getting anything of what you vote for. On the other hand if Trump and Republicans instead retain or even expand their current "majorities" in Congress. Iran's entire strategy falls by the wayside and they lose any leverage they have left, which more than likely means a swift conclusion to the conflict through a negotiated settlement with very favorable terms for the US. On top of that Trump and Republicans would retain the ability to address cost of living concerns with a friendly Congress moving forward, you will get NOTHING for the next two years otherwise. Did I also forget to mention that we wouldn't have to sit through the next two years of a deadlocked government and moronic, pointless investigations and impeachment hearings that go nowhere? The choice is yours America.
7
29
1
155
2,390
I don’t understand why everyone is suddenly acting confused about Iran. Trump never hid the ball on this. He said he didn’t want new wars, and he also said, repeatedly and for years, that Iran would not be allowed to have a nuclear weapon. Those positions were never mutually exclusive. “No new wars” never meant Iran gets a nuclear weapon because stopping them might require military force. Trump didn’t suddenly change his position or invent a new red line after he got elected. He’s been explicit about where that line was for years. None of this came out of nowhere. None of it is a backtrack. And for some of us, it’s exactly why we voted for him.
14
24
1
135
2,049
The leftists are reinventing Colonizing from first principles.
258
2,113
74
35,074
551,687