@CallHome16i
iAccount based inUnited States
About this account
- Account based in
- United States
- Connected via
- United States Android App
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Joined November 2020
- Tweets14.1K
- Following237
- Followers156
- Likes2.3K
nobody can take you guys serious cause you literally call pedo rape "A MIRACLE"
you must denounce christianity and all religion
you have to stop being hypocrites
then we can make progress
literally every single liberal I talk to believes their lies. they are absolutely blown away when i tell them these are all hoaxes. literal conspiracy theories. they are mad and wont believe it. slow it all down and make them google it. then mad that its real.
This clip may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate.
There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span.
This is not “bias."
It’s much worse.
This is direct, planned interference in the debate outcome. When moderators take on the role of “fact checkers" the inference is that the absence of a “fact check” confers validity to the non-fact-checked information.
When one side is repeatedly “fact checked,” while the other is not, that is a signal to the viewer that one side is not reliable and truthful, while the other side is.
The ABC moderators had their orders, and here you see those orders executed.
In this clip:
1) Trump says Pelosi is responsible for security at the Capitol. True. Muir intervenes on Kamala’s behalf by cutting him off with snarky retort, doesn’t acknowledging the validity of Trump’s statement, and immediately redirects to Kamala to set up her “answer" he knows is coming. This is direct action by Muir to affect the outcome of this exchange.
2) Kamala says she was at the Capitol on J6. She was there in the morning, but left to go to DNC HQ prior to the riot. Critical information is omitted. No fact-check.
3) Kamala says Trump incited a mob to attack the Capitol. False. Trump’s “peacefully and patriotically” comments are ignored. Trump is not charged with inciting violence. No fact check.
4) Kamala says that “some" police officers died on January 6. False. No fact check.
5) Kamala recites the Charlottesville “Fine People” hoax. This has been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked. No fact check.
6) Kamala recites the “stand back and stand by” hoax. This is designed to infer that Trump was ordering a “militia” to act on later orders, when he was clearly asking for a cooling of tensions. No fact check.
7) Kamala recites the “bloodbath" hoax. Trump was talking about the automobile industry, not violence. No fact check.
To quote Megyn Kelly on the ABC moderators:
"They did exactly what their bosses wanted."
Call Home retweeted
I have never been materially active in politics before, but this time I think civilization as we know it is on the line.
If we want to preserve freedom and a meritocracy in America, then Trump must win.
Call Home retweeted
So many lives have been lost, because Democrat policies pander to the criminal clients.
Criminals vote overwhelmingly Democrat, so they don’t want to lose their votes.
Call Home retweeted
Since a lot of people have asked, here goes a super unscientific poll …
Who will you vote for?
73%Trump
27%Kamala
5,846,891 votes • Final results Call Home retweeted
I strongly encourage any company who has been systematically boycotted by advertisers to file a lawsuit.
There may also be criminal liability via the RICO Act.