CherryRed retweeted
Never pick a side. Never join a team. Not the US vs China, not republican vs democrat, not men vs women, not black vs white.
The greatest enemy to tyranny is individualism, that is to say, informed people making informed decisions on a case by case basis.
Loyalty to a side is the end of objectivity and death of logic.
That’s why they push these fake binaries on people. They want to shut down your ability to reason.
Replying to @BigBrotherWatch @andyburnham
The establishments in-house fake dissident @silkiecarlo pretending to oppose state overreach 🥱
“If you want someone to run a fake opposition to a plan you have, normalise a future dystopia or instil anger and paranoia give Silkie & the gang a call for a detailed quotation today”
CherryRed retweeted
I really don't see how hard it is to grasp that everything on 'the news' is coded, scripted propaganda - complete fiction - designed to distract, deceive, divide and conquer us by manipulating our emotions and forcing us to abandon logical, critical thought in favour of idiocy
Listen to Michael Gove’s mate & Bullingdon club reject @JMCDelingpole pathetically stumbling over his words trying to avoid quoting @MattersInformed catchphrase. 16 mins into his latest crankcast.
#Ifyouknowtheirnameitcantbe them
Miri is off the Xmas card list @AislingOLoughl1
CherryRed retweeted
There seems to be a new move to rewrite covid history by conflating the very legitimate safety questions surrounding the untested and unnecessary 'vaccines' , which may be killing thousands right now, with claims of 'GoF' and lab leaks.
Just a reminder - there is NO evidence there was ever a new and deadly pathogen. That was a lie. Therefore the GoF story is irrelevant at best and misdirection at worst.
You can't leak an imaginary deadly virus.
But you CAN make up stories about one to cover up your lie.
Remember the one inadmissible thing about 'covid' is that it never existed.
The agenda managers will try anything, 'admit' anything, seed any rumour rather than risk more people realising that simple truth.
CherryRed retweeted
I've always gotten the unshakeable sense that in the end, it all evens out.
The guy with a six-figure salary in a nice neighborhood must deal with the boss -- but he gets a comfy life.
The broke guy in an isolated village may be poor -- but his pace of life is relaxing, he fishes a lot, is never in a rush, etc.
Basically add up any configuration of lifestyle stresses and benefits, total it up, and examine its inverse -- and the net amount of benefit and stress will wind up being the same in the end.
There's not really any "getting ahead" so much as there is "choosing whatever schema of problems and enjoyments you'd most enjoy."
Ever since this dawned on me it's really made life seem a little more playful. It's opened up the playing field mentally. Every choice I could make is just another, new configuration of stress and rewards, ultimately not better or worse than my own -- just different.
CherryRed retweeted
All of the most virulent anti-AI people are brainrotted TikTok addicts. They have nothing to say about how widespread internet access & smartphones were incredibly disruptive technologies that destroyed our social fabric, introduced terminal mind viruses to billions of people, and greatly accelerated our modern alienation & enslavement. All of that is great, says the trans bed-rotting furry with 32 different internet-induced kinks, but AI will turn us into slaves!!
CherryRed retweeted
The embarrassing need to be part of the crowd, the desire to be governed by 'authority', a victim mentality brought about by zero self respect and a childlike penchant for false idol worship is what keeps people in mental and spiritual bondage & what makes them so easy to exploit
CherryRed retweeted
Replying to @MattersInformed
I wouldn’t be so sure that gullible members of the unsuspecting NPCs among us haven’t donated. You should see the outpourings of grief and accusations of “racism” I’m seeing among my leftie contacts. I’m about to burst their bubble by telling them it’s a psyop 😂
Slopulist Irish journalist @AislingOLoughl1 is not so keen on ‘facing hard facts’ when they relate to her. She a garbage peddling propagandist. Don’t pollute your eyeballs with her content.
CherryRed retweeted
We all know about the human predators known as psychopaths.
But what if psychopaths had predators of their own, who are getting better and better at exposing these dark entities, and the full extent of their stranglehold on humanity?
Link 👇
CherryRed retweeted
The lying state asset "Lucy Connolly" was never in prison, and that whole soap opera storyline was simply social media theatre meant to further publicise Reform.
A good friend of Michael Gove and Douglas Murray isn’t to be trusted - who’d have thought it!
Replying to @JMCDelingpole
Thanks. I've given it some thought. I can't go back to your group and I explain why in the screenshots below. Too long for a Tweet.
Can’t comment on the thread as he blocked me, but it seems James is highly sensitive to criticism of establishment players Gove, Murray & Moran - “love the sinner hate the
Sin” I believe is his phrase. This concern does not extend to @MattersInformed, @FrancisxONeill @biddle_leo
CherryRed retweeted
The ruling class does not fear your anger.
It has focus groups for your anger. It has consultants who have modeled your anger and priced in your anger and designed messaging strategies calibrated to your anger that redirect it toward their preferred targets.
Left anger gets redirected at the right. Right anger gets redirected at the left.
The people funding both redirect flows meet for dinner and discuss the quarterly results.
What they have not fully modeled is contempt.
Contempt is different from anger. Anger wants to be heard, wants to win, wants to change something. Anger still believes in the arena.
Contempt has stopped believing in the arena.
Contempt looks at the Senate hearing and sees theater. Looks at the election and sees casting. Looks at the press conference and hears the specific cadence of people who know that nothing they say will have consequences and have long since stopped trying to make it true.
Contempt is not a political position that can be triangulated against.
It is a withdrawal of legitimacy.
And when enough people withdraw it simultaneously, not to a different party, not to a different candidate, but from the entire performance, the performance becomes very expensive to maintain.
They can manage your vote.
They cannot manufacture your belief.
And they are running, for the first time in a long time, genuinely low on it.
@JMCDelingpole does not like people to mention his scumbag friends. Please respect his wish to not mention his close friendships with numerous establishment scumbags.





















