📢‼️ Call for Papers in Criminal Justice and Behavior!
We welcome research exploring what works, for whom, and under what conditions across correctional settings, populations, and rehabilitation approaches. Co-edited by Drs. Kristy Holtfreter and Mark Olver.
Take a look at the latest issue of CJB! ⤵️ journals.sagepub.com/toc/cjb… On the corrections side, we have one study examining culture and trust in a women's prison. Another study looks at the role of collective punishment and procedural legitimacy across eight prisons.
The next study examines the discrimination and calibration properties of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide–Revised (VRAG-R) in a sample people admitted under the Saskatchewan Review Board.
In case you missed it, check out Criminal Justice and Behavior's 50th anniversary special issue (now free to access for 6-months)! 🎂🌟 We feature reflections from all former Editor-in Chiefs, along with nine manuscripts spanning a variety of key topics. journals.sagepub.com/toc/cjb…
Check out the June issue of CJB! 💻‼️journals.sagepub.com/toc/cjb…
This issue opens with a study assessing the psychometric properties of organizational commitment in a sample of Dutch correctional staff.
Continuing with courts and sentencing is one study that unpacks misdemeanor court decisions in Florida, specifically looking at differences in punishment based on the timing of plea dispositions.
Check out one of our new Online First articles! ⬇️
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.…
#NewResearch ‼️by Drs. Toman & Brown (TXST), Bryce Kushmerick-McCune & Dr. Rudes (Sam Houston State), & Aaron Flaherty (Texas Prison Transparency Project), entitled “'They Take it Out on All of Us': Collective Punishment in Carceral Spaces" in @CJB_Journal journals.sagepub.com/eprint/…
Check out the latest issue of CJB! 📝🌟We have a wonderful variety of papers this round, including one from Australia examining procedural justice and wellbeing in the prison context. journals.sagepub.com/toc/cjb…
Also included this issue is a study exploring the reliability and validity of the Criminal Sentiments Scale–Modified and the Pride in Delinquency Scale. We also include a study considering empirically unsupported risk factors in assessments for those convicted of sex offenses.



