academic and private intellectual – political sociology | migration | citizenship | nationalism | ethnicity | anthropology | statistics – 🇭🇺🇷🇴🇪🇸🇬🇧🇯🇵

England et al.
Joined May 2014
Not only is "academic Twitter" completely dead, but @X is absolutely anti-intellect(ual). Maintaining an academic profile here is pointless, so that's that.
4
325
🚨BREAKING: CAF has commissioned an independent investigation into Cambridge’s appointment of Dr Jason Arday as its youngest ever black professor, amid growing professional disquiet over his academic record, the circumstances of his appointment, the University’s handling of concerns raised about his scholarship and, more recently, the scope and direction of Cambridge’s own inquiry. You can find out more here: ardayinvestigation.net/ The investigation will be chaired by Professor Swaran Preet Singh, Lord Singh of Solihull, a former Commissioner of the Equality and Human Rights Commission who previously led the independent investigation into allegations of discrimination within the Conservative Party. He will be joined by a distinguished panel comprising Harvard psychologist Professor Steven Pinker, UCL sociologist Professor Alice Sullivan, Cambridge historian Professor Robert Tombs and Labour peer Professor Maurice Glasman. Award-winning investigative journalist Nick Wallis, whose work helped expose the Post Office Horizon scandal, will lead the investigation with a dedicated research team. CAF has been contacted by numerous Cambridge academics who are deeply concerned that the University’s own investigation will fail to confront the wider institutional culture in which the Arday affair unfolded. Whether these concerns are justified is for the independent investigation to determine. But Cambridge is one of the world’s oldest and greatest universities, and what happens to its academic culture has implications for higher education as a whole. So we think it’s worth going the extra mile to make sure the right questions are asked and the right lessons learned. CAF strongly encourages current and former academics, students and other members of the University community, as well as others with relevant knowledge, to come forward with information. This might include policy documents, internal correspondence or first-hand accounts concerning Arday’s academic record and appointment, the University’s response to concerns about his scholarship and its treatment of those who raised them, and the operation of institutional policies relating to recruitment, promotion, academic misconduct, research integrity and EDI. Anyone wishing to contribute can contact the Investigator directly at: [email protected] The investigation website provides further guidance on submitting information, including arrangements for particularly sensitive material: ardayinvestigation.net/
69
384
64
1,609
155,413
Just trying to figure out the cast here. So: Trump plays Joseph Stalin, Musk is perhaps Aleksei Kosygin, but which one is Vyacheslav Molotov: John Ratcliffe or Kash Patel?
And so the slaughter continues … Time for Zelensky to go
39
Chris Moreh retweeted
The 2027 ASEN Conference will take place from 13 to 15 April 2027 at Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj, Romania on 'Who Belongs to the Nation?' The call for papers is out now and is open until 15 November. Head to asen.ac.uk/conference for more info #asen2027
6
2
13
679
Been thinking about my stance on political Zionism at crucial turning points in history: 1896: strong anti 1903-1914: moderate pro 1914-1930s: moderate anti 1930s-1945: strong pro 1945-1955-7: strong anti 1957-1967: weak anti 1967: No longer an empirically valid issue /1
1
37
1967-1987: pro-1-state (multicultural secular) 1990s: strong pro-2-state 2000s-2023: weak pro-2-state 2023-2026: pro-1-state (secular) October 2026: anti-Zionism is genocide
1
22
The current tide of anti-semitism is a product of our universities. We have taught a generation to label anyone they disagree with as “racist” and to use this as an excuse to hate them. This is why the indoctrination programme of “decolonisation” has been such a dangerous idea.
4
17
2
90
2,835
Those age differences are super interesting and I can think of a number of hypotheses about their underlying mechanisms. I'm personally a bit worried about the sharpness of change among the u-30s...
Worries about AI risk are rising in the US, but may also be getting more polarised
67
They don't make real life like this anymore...
Joder..... hay que verlo hasta el final.
26
Mathematicians have discovered Sociology, but with numbers!
A real professor makes a simple problem look complicated, just to impress the students.😄
32
Chris Moreh retweeted
How has conservatism shaped sociological thought? Join Professor Shamus Khan and chair Professor Sam Friedman for the BJS Annual Lecture, exploring the often-overlooked conservative tradition within sociology. buff.ly/FXn3k8D
11
1
37
4,965
I was wondering how professorships are earned nowadays at my university. Good to know. Now they should prioritise “his welfare, his care, his well-being” to avoid an investigation into that in case it turns out he's not all that top academically telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/09…
39
🧵I am blown away and delighted by the range and quality of endorsements for my forthcoming book "Sex, Lies and Statistics: Why we need evidence-based policy on sex and gender". Some snippets... Evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins @RichardDawkins amazon.co.uk/Sex-Lies-Statis…
I will be buying and reading 👇
37
357
12
1,609
42,755
Chris Moreh retweeted
One reason we might see fancy people using a lot of AI in writing is that offloading writing tasks is natural for them. The difference is that previously they offloaded writing to research assistants or junior staff. Thought leader types often say yes to a lot of things and have tons of ideas, but have limited bandwidth, so they delegate their thought leadership to subordinates. For some, working with AI might actually be a step towards sharing their own thoughts because they don't have to take what comes from an assistant and decide whether they like it. They can just tell a machine what they think, and it spits out an essay. When I worked in government, we contracted with a rock star faculty member to do a research project and then I spent the next six months arguing with their first year PhD student RA about methods. Basically before there was AI slop there was RA slop.
Absolutely beyond parody. Dartmouth’s provost has been turning in 70-100-percent AI-written work (in academic journals, newspapers, and even in email correspondence!) since LLMs came out, the student paper reports. He even used AI to write an op-ed about how universities are dealing with AI cheating.
10
17
1
193
18,772
I think we need both free speech and free silence
30
To be clear: Walking away from studies that don’t support your ideas is a form of research misconduct.
11
27
4
332
63,707
BREAKING: OpenAI might have stolen another major proof. In a detailed Mastodon post, which I report in full in the comments, Andreas Thom presents several pieces of evidence suggesting that OpenAI may have trained Astra on conversations in which he and Gábor Kun were working on Gromov’s soficity conjecture, one of the ten problems OpenAI later announced Astra had solved. I know Andreas. We met several times early in our careers. He is an exceptional mathematician, a leading expert on sofic and hyperlinear groups, and one of the most respected scholars in the field. He has spent two decades working on this problem. If his account is correct, this is not a minor dispute over attribution. It would mean that unpublished human work was absorbed into a model and then presented to the world as a breakthrough by the model itself. And if the allegations raised by Levent Alpöge, Tristan Buckmaster, and now Andreas Thom are all substantiated, we are no longer looking at isolated incidents. We may be looking at one of the greatest intellectual scandals in the history of science. AI is not discovering new mathematics. AI is stealing human discovery.
672
4,819
786
19,755
1,811,887
An interesting set of considerations as we work our way through rethinking academic research, copyright laws, open access, open source, and the balance of power between public institutions and private corporations for the AI age
🦔An NYU mathematician says OpenAI used his own progress against him to beat him to one of the biggest unsolved problems in mathematics. Tristan Buckmaster had been working toward a Millennium Prize proof using OpenAI's Codex when information about his progress reached OpenAI. Days later, OpenAI published a full proof of the same problem using the same uncommon approach, after burning $22.5 million in compute to get there. When Buckmaster confronted them, exec Sébastien Bubeck allegedly said "Why would you ruin your career?" and "If you don't want me to be nice, then I don't have to be nice." My Take OpenAI spent $22.5 million to solve a problem with a $1 million prize. They didn't do this for the bounty. They needed a headline that says "our AI solved one of the hardest problems in mathematics" and they needed it before someone else got credit. They started days after they heard about Buckmaster's progress and took the same uncommon approach he'd pursued for months. That's hard to explain as coincidence. Buckmaster did his work inside Codex. OpenAI reserves the right to train on Codex data. They admit they can't rule out that his usage helped improve their models. So a customer used their product, potentially handed them the roadmap, and then OpenAI outran him with $22.5 million in compute he could never match. I don't know if any of this was intentional. But if you're a researcher and you just watched this happen, I don't think you'd keep your best ideas inside someone else's product. Hedgie🤗 techcrunch.com/2026/09/08/op…
84
Chris Moreh retweeted
1/ What is the prevalence of personally identifiable information (PII) in author-collected data publicly shared in the social sciences? We audited 327 replication packages from 11 leading journals in economics, political science, and psychology Answer: surprisingly high 🧵
3
26
3
61
11,864
I am delighted to announce that my final contribution to the understanding of Viktor Orbán is officially on its way. It is due to be published by @HurstPublishers in early 2027. I will make sure it is worth the wait!
7
61
3
359
15,294