C1ayman retweeted
Be so comfortably straight that you're ok being a little gay with your best friend.
Sir Patrick Stewart, the zenith of positive masculinity.
Vou ser sincero com vocês: até algumas horas atrás, eu achava que Patrick Stewart fizesse parte da comunidade LGBTQ+. Via frequentemente fotos dele trocando selinhos com Ian McKellen e até imaginava que pudesse existir algo além de uma grande amizade entre os dois.
Para minha surpresa, ao pesquisar mais sobre sua vida, descobri que não. Patrick Stewart era heterossexual e foi casado três vezes, sempre com mulheres.
E os selinhos? Eram apenas uma demonstração pública de afeto e carinho por Ian, que é assumidamente gay e um dos seus melhores amigos. Mas o mais importante nunca foi o gesto em si. O verdadeiro significado estava no fato de Patrick usar sua imagem, como um dos atores mais respeitados de Hollywood, para apoiar a comunidade LGBTQ+ de forma aberta e natural.
Patrick Stewart não tinha uma masculinidade frágil e nunca precisou provar sua heterossexualidade para ninguém. Não se preocupava com o que pensavam ou diziam a seu respeito. O que realmente importava para ele era ajudar a construir um mundo mais tolerante e acolhedor.
Um mundo em que seu grande amigo Ian McKellen, e toda a comunidade LGBTQ+, pudessem viver com dignidade e paz.
Sir Patrick Stewart foi, sem dúvida, um homem à frente do seu tempo.
I looked into this and apparently the judge who let him go free has a history of giving sex offenders lenient sentences. There was even a 2025 petition made to have him removed from his position after he allowed a man who admitted to sexually abusing a 6 year old to not have to register as a sex offender and suspended his sentence to just probation.
Prior to that he allowed another man who plead guilty to raping a teen to also not have to register as a sex offender AND suspended his sentence to just probation as well. There are apparently SIX different cases where he has done this not including this case.
His name is Judge Michael Whyte and these are the case numbers where he has allowed men who have raped and abused children to go free.
CR10-23-03237
CR10-21-09722
CR10-21-06045
CR10-23-03237
CR10-23-03819
CR10-24-08091
And here is the phone number to the courthouse where he works so you can leave a nice message letting them know how you feel about them employing this man :) 208-742-1673 citizens in Idaho need to be made aware of this!
Here’s a link to their website and his photo! Posted by Idaho Business Review.
lemhicountyidaho.org/228/Cou…
Sobbing missionary admits he raped girl, 15, in Tesla because he was going through a breakup... as judge who let him get married while on bail allows him to walk free trib.al/5ZaL0d8
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Krew Zaugg was not allowed to walk free. The judge sentenced him to Idaho’s retained jurisdiction ("rider") program, requiring up to one year of treatment in custody. Afterward, the judge will decide whether to send him to prison for 4 to 14 years. eastidahonews.com/2026/10/idaho-…
Lying and ruining the reputation of someone’s business for clout. This streaming shit gotta get nuked
C1ayman retweeted
cinna is such a pandering loser I give it a few months before she starts her right wing grift. none of this is surprising
C1ayman retweeted
SIR PATRICK STEWART (1940-2026)
Before everything else, Patrick was defined by being born and bred in Yorkshire, the proud county in the north of England which he loved to the end. You could hear it in his accented voice and in the stern honesty with which he told you what he thought and felt. Yorkshiremen have no truck with half-truths or avoidance of big issues. He wore his heart on his sleeve, which made him a man to rely on, to admire and in my case, love.
We first met as ambitious young actors with the Royal Shakespeare Company half a century ago but we weren’t in the same productions. My first strong memory was a few years later, meeting him in the street in central London when he told me about an offer to take over a leading part in 'Star Trek'. “But Patrick think of your stage career in the UK. Do you really want to risk—getting lost in Hollywood for years and years?”. Well, he took the risk and thank goodness for us all that he did for not just his devoted Trekkies but film and theatre audiences, who marvelled at his using international celebrity to star in a string of cinema successes ('X-Men' of course) and in great classical plays by Shakespeare, Ibsen, Arthur Miller, Peter Shaffer, Pinter and Beckett at Stratford-upon-Avon, in London’s West End and on Broadway.
America was his adopted home, where he met his adored Sunny who has cared for him through sickness and health, through thick and thin. But he never forsook his origins: and the proudest achievement of the most respected and beloved actor of his generation on either side of the Atlantic, was his appointment as Chancellor of Huddersfield University in Yorkshire.
His farewell performance in 'Avengers: Doomsday' is yet to be seen.
Ian McKellen 29 October 2026
Photo: University of Huddersfield
C1ayman retweeted
Because making deepfake porn of someone and them dressing up for Halloween are apparently the same in this morons mind.
C1ayman retweeted
Case 1:omg women hate accountability,she ruined my man TenZ’s life and idc that they both denied it,Reddit incels told the truth. burn her at the stake
Case 2:get over it snowflakes,who even cares he bought ai porn of streamers🤣he even donated!cant cancel a man for jerkin off😂
C1ayman retweeted
why do men want to be able to harass women and then be free to live without the consequences after a certain amount of time passes
xQc calls Pokimane stupid for bringing up Atrioc years after the deepfake incident 😳
"Not defending this guy but, if someone is in their own lane and live in their own ecosystem and you come after them, you're always wrong idgaf."
"They're in their little corner.. Especially, if it's been a long time.. You’re just stupid.. I'll never be on your side idgaf."
C1ayman retweeted
“poki’s bringing it up again when atrioc is actually trying to change”
poki has every right to bring it up whenever she fucking wants. thats her traumatic experience to share (or not to share)
atrioc is changing? good. but let this be a lesson for men out there.
the way she was super nice in this clip and even said its fine to disagree with her and people are STILL attacking her for being uncomfortable around the man who literally paid for ai deepfakes to be made of her . how is that unreasonable of her at all
C1ayman retweeted
Men making themselves a victim in a situation they caused <<<<<<<<<
C1ayman retweeted
men want to be able to sexually abuse women and then move on within a couple years soooo bad. They just want to be able to get away with it.
xQc calls Pokimane stupid for bringing up Atrioc years after the deepfake incident 😳
"Not defending this guy but, if someone is in their own lane and live in their own ecosystem and you come after them, you're always wrong idgaf."
"They're in their little corner.. Especially, if it's been a long time.. You’re just stupid.. I'll never be on your side idgaf."
C1ayman retweeted
You shouldn’t have to make your friends choose a side. It shouldnt have to be a choice. AI porn is non consensual, it’s violating and does not need to be forgiven.
it's astonishing to me how people can easily forgive men for being disgusting, and they are mad at women for not being forgiving even if the violation and damage has already been done? get the fuck out
C1ayman retweeted
misogyny is alive and well - just take one look at the replies to this post.
people are really trying to make Pokimane out to be the one in the wrong when she's understandably upset someone looked at fake pics of her. absolutely vile people on this app man
hi everyone, i want to clarify some things about what i said on stream yesterday.
1) when he was first caught looking at paywalled, deepfake content of female streamers, it seems people forgot that the specific page shown on his stream was of me.
i didn't say much at the time because i was so uncomfortable, publicly humiliated, and i didn't think it needed explaining because it was so obviously wrong.
2) i appreciate that he spent thousands of dollars helping remove ai/df content (3000$ of which was offered to me specifically), but i've had to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars towards that same effort. regardless, no amount of money undoes what happened.
3) i'm not trying to cancel anyone or be the arbiter of who can do what. i'm simply sharing my feelings about something that publicly happened to me, and the ways in which it's affecting me today.
as he's become more involved in events and with people close to me, i've grown particularly uncomfortable. as far as i know, no one has really checked in with the women affected about how it makes them feel. other people forgiving him is their choice, but it doesn't mean i can't share my perspective on it as well.
one thing i've seen happen far too often is the rewriting of history, particularly as it pertains to issues like these, so i prefer to stand my ground so the narrative doesn't get twisted. hope this clarifies things!
C1ayman retweeted
:(( this whole situation is such a clear example of the treatment men vs women streamers get. he's invited and welcomed to a wedding after something so damaging, while at that same wedding a group of girls are being trashed for a MISTAKE that was not malicious.
hi everyone, i want to clarify some things about what i said on stream yesterday.
1) when he was first caught looking at paywalled, deepfake content of female streamers, it seems people forgot that the specific page shown on his stream was of me.
i didn't say much at the time because i was so uncomfortable, publicly humiliated, and i didn't think it needed explaining because it was so obviously wrong.
2) i appreciate that he spent thousands of dollars helping remove ai/df content (3000$ of which was offered to me specifically), but i've had to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars towards that same effort. regardless, no amount of money undoes what happened.
3) i'm not trying to cancel anyone or be the arbiter of who can do what. i'm simply sharing my feelings about something that publicly happened to me, and the ways in which it's affecting me today.
as he's become more involved in events and with people close to me, i've grown particularly uncomfortable. as far as i know, no one has really checked in with the women affected about how it makes them feel. other people forgiving him is their choice, but it doesn't mean i can't share my perspective on it as well.
one thing i've seen happen far too often is the rewriting of history, particularly as it pertains to issues like these, so i prefer to stand my ground so the narrative doesn't get twisted. hope this clarifies things!
C1ayman retweeted
ppl when a woman doesn't want to be around a man who tried to see her naked without her consent
C1ayman retweeted
her talking about this now is so important. it shows that no matter how much time has passed its hard to forget being objectified in such an invasive/public way. many people especially women have felt this. the comments only prove why its important despite how long ago it was.
C1ayman retweeted
hi everyone, i want to clarify some things about what i said on stream yesterday.
1) when he was first caught looking at paywalled, deepfake content of female streamers, it seems people forgot that the specific page shown on his stream was of me.
i didn't say much at the time because i was so uncomfortable, publicly humiliated, and i didn't think it needed explaining because it was so obviously wrong.
2) i appreciate that he spent thousands of dollars helping remove ai/df content (3000$ of which was offered to me specifically), but i've had to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars towards that same effort. regardless, no amount of money undoes what happened.
3) i'm not trying to cancel anyone or be the arbiter of who can do what. i'm simply sharing my feelings about something that publicly happened to me, and the ways in which it's affecting me today.
as he's become more involved in events and with people close to me, i've grown particularly uncomfortable. as far as i know, no one has really checked in with the women affected about how it makes them feel. other people forgiving him is their choice, but it doesn't mean i can't share my perspective on it as well.
one thing i've seen happen far too often is the rewriting of history, particularly as it pertains to issues like these, so i prefer to stand my ground so the narrative doesn't get twisted. hope this clarifies things!









































