Break Your Contrived Reality 🇺🇲 retweeted
🚨🚨THE DEMOCRACY FILES, PART 2: WHEN AND HOW TO DECLARE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ILLEGITIMATE 🚨
Some questioned whether a group of 200 ex-USAID officials could actually pull off their ambitions to rewrite the Constitution.
Here, they describe exactly how it works. They aren't working alone.
The videos all come from Renew to Thrive (R2T) group and associates. Danielle Reiff and Paul Zeitz play key roles within R2T.
R2T sits inside a much, much larger umbrella called United Democracy Alliance (UDA), which is an extremely hush-hush control plane of leaders from major "blocking" NGOs such as 50501 and Indivisible fulfilling various functions. UDA decides when protests get deployed, timelines, how to respond, all that.
R2T's role within UDA is concerned with "the day after tomorrow" - in other words, their function is to conceive what a rewritten American government will look like after the rest of UDA fulfills its purpose. As will be shown, Erica Chenoworth is credited with conceiving UDA in the first place under the Horizons "Big Tent" initiative.
Note here that National Security Leaders for America (NSL4A) is credited for operationalizing UDA. NSL4A is a group of 1,600 ex-military, intelligence, and diplomatic officials. They are led by Rear Admiral Michael E. Smith (Ret). NSL4A also played a key role in the "illegal orders" messaging which targeted Pete Hegseth. Zeitz is also a member of NSL4A.
It must be emphasized that the choice of a military-oriented organization to coordinate NGOs across domestic protests is an interesting one all in itself - especially in an umbrella conceived by a regime change expert like Chenoworth.
You will have a hard time finding any mentions of UDA in the public. They are extremely hush-hush and selective who they talk to.
Mike Smith himself makes a personal appearance in other calls, coordinating Insurrection Act exercises and roleplaying with R2G as one of the participants.
As the audio transcript shows, they have outlined a sequence of "redlines" in which case the federal government should be declared illegitimate. Invoking the Insurrection Act against "peaceful" protesters is one of the most discussed redlines. I will post the illegitimate criteria below, but basically, almost any effective pushback against NGOs is a measure of illegitimacy according to them.
Important to understand:
The audio shows they shopped this idea around governors, but the reality is that governors do not have to explicitly sign on to the pact to play their role in the coup. All they have to do is refuse troops in their state and let UDA / R2G do the work of dissolving the federal government.
Break Your Contrived Reality 🇺🇲 retweeted
BREAKING NEWS: Abdul El-Sayed Campaign Official Reveals El-Sayed Receives Overseas Donations, Admits Foreign Contributions Are Illegal Under Federal Law, Warns Denouncing Hamas Could Cost Support
“You know, he [Abdul El-Sayed] has people from overseas that donate to him...No it is not allowed."
“He [Abdul El Sayed] can't just say, you know, no, I don't support Hamas, you know, I reject all of them, because he's going to lose the people that brought him up in the first place.”
@AbdulElSayed @MikeRogersForMI
Break Your Contrived Reality 🇺🇲 retweeted
🚨🚨THE DEMOCRACY FILES, PART 1: THE PLAN 🚨
I am working on gathering all the documents.
Now, here's something to understand about the "democracy" and protest ecosystem: almost nobody knows the 'grand plan' so to speak. They simply agree to play a role.
For example, 99% of people breaking stuff on the streets believe they're doing it out of an organic uprising. They don't see that the police have been ordered to stand down. They don't see that legal services have already been arranged for them. They don't see that foundations are paying for their bonds.
Similarly here, governors aren't participating in a pact to destroy the Constitution. Governors simply have agreed to push back on the Insurrection Act. The effect is the same: the governors end up playing a role in a grander plan.
I call this "shared epistemology" in my book Unelected. Motivations differ, people rarely agree to the big evil supervillain framing, but incentives all converge in the same end goal.
No Kings might not agree to explicitly tear down the Constitution, but they nonetheless work with DSA and will turn out millions of people if the right phone call is put in.
Here is one articulation of the plan - and crucially, since then, they have put many NGOs in their places to execute their proper role at all levels when the time is right.
Many more coming.
Break Your Contrived Reality 🇺🇲 retweeted
This is going to be an NGO slush fund. This is a bribe to left-wing politicians to get them on board with AI so that will follow Anthropic's lead on any policy or regulation.
Between this and our prior commitments, roughly 20% of all Anthropic equity will be dedicated to the public good, and that commitment can grow as Anthropic grows.
We plan to use these funds to ensure more people can share in the benefits of AI, and to increase our ability to provide funding to deal with its risks.
Break Your Contrived Reality 🇺🇲 retweeted
The past few days, I got my hands on thousands of new transcripts and hundreds of recordings, thanks to leads from @SKDoubleDub33 and @iamlisalogan .
You've heard that the DSA is proposing structural reforms to America, including abolishing the Senate and imposing term limits.
What you not have heard is - there is an operational plan to put it all into action. If the Democratic Party sweeps 2026, then DSA will become "foot soldiers" in constant clashes with the administration to cross a "red line" or invoke a "doomsday scenario" - meaning, President Trump invokes the Insurrection Act, probably sometime in 2027.
Then, a lot of coordinated responses kick off, including delegitimizing the federal government itself and handing that legitimacy to Democratic governors. 2028 then becomes a vote on whether to keep America governance as-is or to burn it all down to appease a "young and brown" demographic.
The mysterious group who's been coordinating 50501, Indivisible, and coordinating the NoKings protests is called "United Democracy Alliance" and their intellectual leader is Erica Chenoweth who came up with the 3.5% rule of nonviolent regime change.
Patience. I know I've hyped this more than anything else. It's genuinely the biggest discovery I've had. This is an enormous archive. This is only the beginning.
Break Your Contrived Reality 🇺🇲 retweeted
My favorite part of the Herrera campaign is that everyone who watched his content on YouTube is now deeply aware of the specifics of how politicians are slandered during their campaigns.
Break Your Contrived Reality 🇺🇲 retweeted
They aren’t burning historic buildings because of economic reasons, they’re burning them because they are important to the French, they hate the French, and they are not French.
People keep acting like their targets are random.
Break Your Contrived Reality 🇺🇲 retweeted
The trick is always the same. Recast an issue as evidence of Western "structural oppression," blame the social relations and institutions that constitute the West, then con people into believing that overcoming them advances humanity toward a higher, more conscious order.
The trick is always the same. Find an issue that can be reinterpreted through a framework of Western "structural oppression," blame the inherited distinctions of Western institutions, then present dismantling them as another act of repair toward a higher, more conscious social order.
Roth applies this pattern of critique to all-male fraternities, the old WASP clubhouse straight out of Caddyshack II. He begins with sexual assault and moves from misconduct within fraternities to questioning the legitimacy of male-only membership itself. He even invokes their historical exclusion of Catholics, Jews, and Black people to cast admitting women as the next step in moral progress. Members must surrender another part of their institution's identity to demonstrate their commitment to its highest ideals. Resistance becomes evidence of the very oppression the reform is supposed to correct.
Roth acknowledges that he cannot determine how much of Wesleyan's decline in reported sexual violence resulted from mandatory coeducation rather than other changes. Yet he presents ending male-only membership as the lesson other universities should learn. The causal evidence is uncertain, but the prescribed praxis is unequivocal. Incredible.
Roth's proposed scam of transformation follows the logic of sublation. He wants to preserve the fraternity's community, loyalty, and independence while abolishing its exclusively male character. The inherited form is overcome, its valuable qualities supposedly preserved, and the result celebrated as a higher realization of what the institution ought to have been.
The process of left activism is asymmetrical and one way. Western boundaries, traditions, and identities are condemned as structures of oppression, while comparable distinctions are celebrated as autonomy, cultural preservation, and self-determination when claimed by groups deemed "marginalized." Each reform addresses a particular alleged injustice, but together these critiques converge on the sublation of the West: the overcoming of its inherited forms in pursuit of a higher, universal order.
The deeper con in arguments like Roth's is the promise that nothing essential will be lost when Westerners surrender their civilizational inheritance. They are convinced that this surrender is the highest expression of fidelity to humanity, while the rest of the world is encouraged to regard it as noble and just. Western civilization's achievements, including liberty, equality, justice, and human dignity, will supposedly survive, even flourish, once freed from the institutions, traditions, and identities that produced and sustained them.
This is the inversion at the heart of demoralization. People are conned into believing that fulfilling their civilization's highest ideals requires overcoming the civilization itself. They then willingly participate in its sublation, convinced they're doing something good.
Break Your Contrived Reality 🇺🇲 retweeted
A former CIA agent is telling the public, she will intimidate young people out of serving in government with “law-fare” for siding with the party she opposes. Recall
ON UCHICAGO CAMPUS: U.S. Senator from Michigan Elissa Slotkin hopes planned political prosecutions of republican leaders will scare young conservatives from getting involved in politics.
@ElissaSlotkin
Break Your Contrived Reality 🇺🇲 retweeted
Wokeness is not a “perspective” among others competing in the marketplace of ideas.
It is a torch to the marketplace itself.
Not grasping this is one of the most serious vulnerabilities of well-meaning academics and professionals trying to address problems in their fields.
Break Your Contrived Reality 🇺🇲 retweeted
"His core claim: espionage is the small part. The big part is subversion – and it works through demoralization: changing a society’s perception of reality so that, despite an abundance of information, nobody can reach sensible conclusions in defense of themselves, their family or their country. And it isn’t carried out by spies. It is carried out by the country’s own people – local socialists, useful idiots and the like: professors, teachers, journalists, entertainers, activists, most of whom have no idea whose work they are doing."
Yuri Bezmenov – The Long March in Four Stages.
In 1984, a former Soviet KGB propagandist sat in front of a camera in Los Angeles and explained how to destroy a country without firing a shot: by sowing demoralization and unrest, using its own local socialists, useful idiots and the like. Most people laughed. Today the clip goes viral every other week.
1. Born in 1939 near Moscow, the son of a Soviet army officer. He studied Indian languages and joined the Novosti press agency – in his account, a front for the KGB. Posted to India, his job was deception and subversion: handle foreign journalists and intellectuals, show them what they were supposed to see, and shape what they wrote home.
2. In 1970 he defected – disguised as a hippie, slipping out of India with a group of Western travelers. He settled in Canada under a new name and worked in radio. In 1984 he gave the interview that made him famous.
3. His core claim: espionage is the small part. The big part is subversion – and it works through demoralization: changing a society’s perception of reality so that, despite an abundance of information, nobody can reach sensible conclusions in defense of themselves, their family or their country. And it isn’t carried out by spies. It is carried out by the country’s own people – local socialists, useful idiots and the like: professors, teachers, journalists, entertainers, activists, most of whom have no idea whose work they are doing.
4. Stage one: demoralization. It takes fifteen to twenty years – the time needed to educate one generation. The targets are the schools, the universities, the media, the churches, the culture: Gramsci’s institutions. The result is a person who can no longer process facts. Show him the evidence, and he refuses to believe it.
5. Stage two: destabilization – a few years of sowing unrest in the economy, the defense, the institutions and the streets. Stage three: crisis – a few weeks of breakdown, after which a new power arrives promising salvation.
6. Stage four: normalization. Central Europe knows that word. After Soviet tanks crushed the Prague Spring in 1968, Moscow called the occupation "normalization." Poland lived its own version after martial law. The abnormal, declared normal. And the useful idiots who helped the revolution? Bezmenov said they would be the first to be discarded once it won. The revolution devours its own.
7. Not every number he gave can be verified – he was a dramatic witness. But the mechanism holds. And there is one thing he missed. The Soviet Union died in 1991. The demoralization didn’t. It no longer needs the KGB. It runs on its own fuel now – grants, careers, NGOs, prizes. Münzenberg’s machine outlived him; so did Moscow’s.
In 2020 his interview opened a Call of Duty trailer. A new generation met him through a video game – and recognized its own world.
The interview is linked below. If you haven’t watched it, you have to.
Poles lived stage four. The West has been living stage one for half a century.
Demoralization takes a generation. So does the cure. It starts at the kitchen table: tell the truth, teach the children, have courage and refuse to call the abnormal normal.
Break Your Contrived Reality 🇺🇲 retweeted
Premise:
Incentives drive all human behavior.
The corollary:
How to destroy a country:
A vast social security and support system that serves as a magnet for those who would rather not work.
An open immigration policy that does not screen immigrants to determine their ability and willingness to provide for themselves and their families.
An open immigration policy that does not screen for political and/or religious ideologies that are a threat to the country.
Economic incentives large enough to incentivize immigrants on the state dole to have large numbers of children, but insufficient for educated and economically productive mothers to be able to quit to raise a family.
The declining fertility of the most educated and productive women due to their delay to begin a family as a result of their desire and/or need to advance their careers, among other reasons, to live a life they deem consistent with their educational achievements and/or to repay their student debts.
Amnesty programs that give citizenship and voting power to illegal immigrants without consideration of their economic productivity or their threat to the country due to their religious or political ideologies.
The changing demographics and increased population due to the above factors.
The state responding to protests by increasing social support.
The continued failure to punish and hold accountable violent and looting rioters.
Government managed by a massive and growing unelected bureaucracy.
Government fraud, waste, and abuse contributed to ballooning budgets.
Anti-business legislation that makes it difficult for businesses to compete in a global marketplace being disrupted by AI, including restrictions on firing even poorly performing employees.
Overly burdensome, globally uncompetitive, corporate taxation.
Continuous increases in personal taxes to raise funds to provide for the rapidly growing welfare state.
The substantial majority of the tax burden levied on a small percentage of the population.
A growing percentage of the electorate paying no taxes and receiving welfare.
The introduction or threat of a wealth tax including the taxation of unrealized gains, i.e., taxes on paper wealth.
The flight of the most productive business builders and highest taxpayers to lower tax countries with lesser security concerns.
A growing percentage of the electorate voting for candidates that support increased welfare and laws favorable to, and/or that match the cultural and ideological needs and desires of a growing unproductive immigrant population.
The rapid rise in anti-semitism and inadequate efforts to address this hatred.
Increased borrowing by the state to fund the growing social burden.
Higher sovereign interest rates due to all of the above.
The resulting need to reduce expenditures to make the math work.
Increasingly violent protests that make life less livable for the productive and law abiding citizens leading to their accelerated departure.
And so on…
Break Your Contrived Reality 🇺🇲 retweeted
It was never their intention to assimilate and integrate. Europe’s approach to what human rights involve must be reevaluated.
Break Your Contrived Reality 🇺🇲 retweeted
Civilisation is based on the exclusion of savages. Unconditional inclusivity under the guise of respect for human rights is anti-civilisation.
Replying to @disclosetv
UPDATE - The town hall's historic bell tower in Limoges has collapsed. The building is on the verge of burning down.
Break Your Contrived Reality 🇺🇲 retweeted
I often say leftists are blank-slate fundamentalists, but that misses their deeper priority: the sublation of the West. Commitment to any particular concept is secondary to that goal.
Spend enough time around leftists, and you'll see that priority emerge. Years ago, I was at a party attended mostly by academics when I got into a conversation with a family member of one of the participants. He was married to an African woman and, strangely, turned our conversation toward genetics.
He enthusiastically, and a little drunkenly, explained that Africans were genetically superior to Europeans because African populations had greater genetic diversity.
What struck me was how openly he asserted racial biological superiority in a room full of leftist academics. Loudly, he pointed to biological differences as evidence of superiority, precisely the kind of biological essentialism that blank-slate fundamentalism supposedly rules out. I later heard similar claims from academics in non-published settings with more careful qualifications. Stripped of the usual usual academic hedging, the underlying priority was naked and easy to see.
Blank-slate fundamentalism was negotiable. Even claims of biological supremacy could apparently be entertained if they served the larger project of leftist praxis: the sublation of the West. The same priority drives pressure to slant research on human origins, warfare, and other subjects toward preferred political conclusions. Doctrinal consistency isn't the lefts priority. The sublation of the West is, and these commitments can be abandoned or contradicted when they interfere with the larger objective.
Dr. Eleanor Scerri of Max Planck Institute says the idea that humans originated in Southern Africa based on the fact that the oldest haplogroups are located there is unlikely. gea.mpg.de/person/52339/2944
Break Your Contrived Reality 🇺🇲 retweeted
To be demoralized is to have your sense of reality so inverted that you fail to recognize you are in a state of war, mistake those attacking you for victims, and willingly assist them in undermining your own society while believing you are doing something good.
Break Your Contrived Reality 🇺🇲 retweeted
Muslims when you let to many in look what @EmmanuelMacron did to France.
That building withstood wars and chaos.
But when you invite the enemy in the gates this is the result you get.
Next comes the real bad parts...
Break Your Contrived Reality 🇺🇲 retweeted
“The social order created by the philosophy of the Enlightenment assigned supremacy to the common man. In his capacity as a consumer, the ‘regular fellow’ was called upon to determine ultimately what should be produced, in what quantity, and of what quality, by whom, how, and where; in his capacity as voter, he was sovereign in directing the nation’s policies.”
- Ludwig Von Mises, Liberalism
This is why liberalism (classical) is under attack from every direction. Every pressure group pressing down on us wants to do away with classical liberalism because it is this system of governance & its philosophical traditions & ancestry that present the common man as sovereign individuals possessing power by virtue of his very nature (our unalienable rights, which the government may not violate). It is individuals who affect the market, it is individuals who determine elections. This means *all* individuals; regular, average citizen individuals. Not just members of an elite caste, nobility, heritage, race/ethnicity, sex, religion, expertise, or ability. ALL citizens.
American Classical Liberalism is distinct from every other system of governance that exists. America was forged in a deliberately distinct way, deviating from European traditions, including the English. People do not understand the nuance in intention, & want to paint our heritage as Lockean & flatten the very important distinctions that make us unique. But, there are reasons why we today do not look the same as the UK or Canada. America did something very unique, & the position we are in today on the global stage does set us apart as being the last stronghold for liberty.
All these collectivist pressure groups - from communists, to technocrats, to Mondialists to postliberals - want to convince us to give up on (classic, American) liberalism because it is that system that assures us that we are capable, as sovereign individuals, in directing our own lives. They are elitists, & collectivists.
American classical liberalism, & the American Experiment are direct repudiations of both of those notions (elitism & collectivism).
Break Your Contrived Reality 🇺🇲 retweeted
The leftist mods of r/litrpg staged a coup and outed the owner of the subreddit because he's a centrist.
Break Your Contrived Reality 🇺🇲 retweeted
> be european
> 18 hour work weeks
> 2 hour lunch breaks
> entire summers off
> no air conditioning in 40°C heatwaves because “it’s not traditional” and “bad for the environment”
> submit a 67-page impact assessment to the Directorate-General for Appropriate Innovation
> wait eleven months while three separate steering committees review the same document
> discover that Subcommittee B never received the file because the inter-service consultation form was filed under the wrong classification code
> re-submit under the corrected code
> get told the corrected code itself requires pre-approval from the Working Group on Procedural Harmonization
> which meets quarterly and was just disbanded pending a new mandate from the Council
> it's now 5 years in
> produce nothing for a decade because you're still waiting for the final non-objection certificate from the Agency for the Supervision of Non-Objection Certificates
> meanwhile Chinese EVs are eating your lunch
> sit in front of your screen and mock the American car company that just demoed one that can do sub-1-second 0-60 and jump over trucks with rocket thrusters
> feel superior



























