Pinned Tweet
βI have always considered, with Luther and Calvin, that the sum and substance of the gospel lies in that word Substitution,βChrist standing in the stead of man.β - C.H. Spurgeon
10
1,239
Branden Preedy π retweeted
Biological maleness is not proper to God, but masculine naming is not a mere nominal convention. It is revelatory.
Just as Fatherhood is a relative attribute of God, so masculinity is a relative attribute of God.
A relative attribute names the relation between creation and God.
Had lunch with one of my @MBTSGlobal Baptist History students today. We discussed:
Baptist catholicity
Evangelism
Church membership
Baptist historyβs usefulness for ministry
But mostly we talked about why itβs good to be a Baptist.
Branden Preedy π retweeted
βIs God Defined by Sex?β
Todayβs topic again shows the Bibleβs doctrine of God is not being taught. Instead Mormonism, transgenderism, & gender worship are reviving paganism.
God said, βFor I am God, and not a man!β Jesus said, βGod is spirit!β He transcends your being, people!
π―
Replying to @BrianDembo @BrandenPreedy
For the Godhead to be male apart from physical gender means it is based on something else, which, as I understand it, is exactly the argument of trans, non-gender, non-binary, etc.
1
1
129
My family uses the Catechism for Boys and Girls.
Question 9 asks, βWho is God?β
The children answer, βGod is a Spirit, and has not a body like men.β
Itβs not rocket science, nor is it liberal, to affirm that God is Spirit and transcends gender.
Even a child can do it.
Sad to miss ETS this year, but these papers look great. Make sure you attend!
NEWS | Midwestern Seminary Faculty and Students to Present Research at ETS Annual Meeting
Read the news: bit.ly/4irhEeF
63
There are consequences to alienating your base, failing to deliver on campaign promises, and burning bridges with political allies.
I pray that this is a wake-up call to the GOP and that it marks the return of common-sense conservatism to the party.
I donβt love the label βReformed Baptistβ for historical reasons, but the answer is simply βno.β
In fact, the confessional documents of the 17th-century Particular Baptists were penned for the express purpose of demonstrating their catholicity.
Reformed Baptist catholic -- is it impossible to hold together?
53%no
47%yes
265 votes β’ Final results 1
3
318
Branden Preedy π retweeted
OTD in 1962, trustees of @MBTS dismissed Old Testament professor Ralph Elliott following a controversy over his book The Message of Genesis.
Published in 1961 by the SBC's Broadman Press, the book challenged traditional interpretations of Genesis, including the historicity of Adam and Eve and the worldwide flood. Elliott's refusal to prevent the book's republication ultimately led to his dismissal.
The controversy became one of the most significant theological disputes in Southern Baptist life during the 1960s and helped prompt the revision of the Baptist Faith and Message in 1963.
In 2013, three Southern Baptist historians revisited the controversy in a panel discussion at Midwestern Seminary, moderated by President Jason Allen.
Read the Baptist Press account of that discussion:
buff.ly/031jDpt
But to all who did receive him, who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God.
John 1:12
51
Branden Preedy π retweeted
Friends, it's here. The final set (Vols. 51-63) of C. H. Spurgeon's sermons has been released. After more than two decades out of print, the complete 63 volumes of the New Park Street and Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit are now available once again. These sermons provide a library of Puritan, experiential theology, devotional warmth, biblical insight, and homiletical training. @RHB_Books @SpurgeonMBTS
Purchase the set here: heritagebooks.org/products/cβ¦
A good word from Wesley as we all go out and vote.
Youβre unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
46
Time to recirculate this, I guess.
Religious Liberty and English Particular Baptists (EPBs), a thread:
In the 1660s/70s, two acts were passed by parliament with the express purpose of suppressing the voices of nonconformists. One was the Corporation Act (61) and the other was the Test Act (73).
/1
1
89















