AI- en M&A-consultant | Voorstander van grensbeveiliging | Tech-liefhebber 🚀🌟

Los Angeles
Joined June 2022
Mila A. retweeted
this is absurdly f*cking dangerous... REA Founder just dropped a prompt that turns any AI agent into a reverse-engineering lab with REA one paste and your agent will: - take apart Windows .exe files, Android APKs and iPhone apps - trace any feature from a button on screen to the function behind it - map an app's hidden API from a single network capture - unpack firmware and follow it straight into native code - and that's only the beginning... 130+ tools in one free MCP. Send it to Claude Code and thank me later. Before you run it, read the article below:
REA hit #1 on GitHub trending, and most people still run it inside a single chat Split it into 4 subagents and one command takes a program you own from sealed binary to a tested rebuild with a match rate Set it up once, aim it at the next one:
5
51
331
16,920
Mila A. retweeted
Build document extraction pipelines for batch jobs and AI agents! Document extraction has traditionally been a pretty deterministic workflow. You know which documents need to be processed, what needs to be extracted, and when the job should run, so a CLI works well for batch jobs, scheduled scripts, and repeatable pipelines. AI agents introduce a different execution pattern. The document might show up halfway through a task, and the agent needs to decide at runtime whether it should extract something from it before continuing with the rest of the workflow. That is where MCP becomes useful. The extraction capability itself does not need to change, but the way it gets called does. For example, you might use a CLI to process hundreds of invoices every night, while an agent could receive a single invoice during a conversation, call the extraction workflow through MCP, get the structured fields it needs, and continue with the task. So CLI and MCP are not really competing interfaces for document extraction. One fits workflows where execution is known and repeatable, while the other fits cases where an agent needs to invoke the same kind of capability dynamically at runtime. I’ve shared a session from Unstract in the comments where they’re walking through the same extraction project as a CLI batch job and through MCP for an agent workflow.
5
10
42
1,799
Mila A. retweeted
A chief digital officer at a $10B bank told me he almost never takes calls from AI vendors. He took mine, and spent 30 minutes telling me how to sell better. I'm stealing all of it. 1. Big banks with their own data centers and GPUs will build it themselves. Don't chase them. 2. The sweet spot is mid-tier: smaller banks, insurers, payment providers. Mostly on the cloud, small tech teams. 3. Don't pitch AI. Pitch skipping the digital transformation they never finished: onboarding drop-off, little self-service, weak cross-sell. 4. Run a 90-day sprint with their team on one or two journeys. Prove value, then grow. 5. Stay model-neutral. A model company wants you to burn its tokens. You don't have to. the buyer doesn't want AI. They want the broken journey to work.
1
1
7
325
Everyone called Polsia "AI slop" the week it launched. Bugs everywhere. Replies full of people dunking on it. 340 days later it's a $20M run rate company. I've watched a hundred AI founders polish for a year and launch to silence. Ben shipped something half-broken, ate the hate, and kept going. The people laughing at your launch are still paying attention to it.
🤝 Paid partnership
Polsia is about to hit $25M run rate. Next stop: $100M ARR. And things keep accelerating: $0 → $1M in 12 weeks $1M → $10M in 10 weeks $10M → $20M in 6 weeks I just published one of my favorite and most successful aisloP episodes yet: “The Run Rate.” I tell the whole story, from idea to $20M, month by month. The episode ends in Tokyo, where I went a few weeks ago. Probably the best place on Earth to take a deep breath, get inspired, and rethink what’s possible. I came back with an even bolder vision for Polsia. The road from $25M to $100M is going to look very different. Polsia v2 is coming soon.
8
7
24
5,318
Mila A. retweeted
Most people use Claude like a chatbot. That’s the problem. This Claude Cheat Sheet shows you how to use Claude like a real productivity system: [ 𝐍𝐨𝐭𝐞: 𝐅𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰 𝐌𝐞: @AI_Reveals(𝐅𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐨 𝐃𝐌)] → The ultimate prompt formula → 15+ powerful prompt shortcuts → Projects, Artifacts, Skills & Connectors → Claude Code, MCP, Research & Agents → Build websites, dashboards & full projects → A complete Claude workflow → Real-world use cases → 5 rules for consistently better results If you use Claude regularly, save this cheat sheet. You’ll probably need it more than once. Valued at $81. FREE for the next 48 hrs. Type “CLAUDE” Follow me : @AI_Reveals.
9
13
1
65
1,592
Mila A. retweeted
This is generally true of the tech industry.
Replying to @hassanrahim
they're trying to cut open the bird to find the song
1
2
41
3,163
Tech bros, philosophers, consultants, corporate employees, marketers, AI "gurus"... Three things can be true at the same time: 1) AI will replace jobs 2) AI is a source of slop generation 3) Thanks to AI, there will be more jobs tomorrow than today Last month, I wrote about it in my newsletter. Random screenshots:
2
3
1
12
1,332
Mila A. retweeted
Your coding agent can edit video — not just write the edit list. BashCut is a native macOS video editor for builders who want coding agents to work directly on a video project. It helps you make edits through the same undoable operations as the UI by exposing the editor through the `bashcut` CLI and an MCP server. Key features: • Layered timeline – work with video, overlays, text, voiceover, music, and SFX layers in one edit • Agent-driven editing – Claude Code, Codex, and other agents can use the CLI or MCP server to operate the editor • Shared preview and export – both use one composition engine, so the preview reflects the exported result • Captions and text – transcribe speech with a local Whisper plugin and import or export SubRip captions • Plain JSON projects – projects sit next to footage, so agents and scripts can read and edit them It’s open-source (MIT license). Link in the reply 👇
19
6
1
25
1,769
Mila A. retweeted
I genuinely think we could wake up tomorrow to an AI that solves three major scientific problems, discovers a new branch of mathematics and designs a working fusion reactor. And the top comment would still be some guy asking whether it can count the letters in strawberry. The internet is undefeated. 🫠
19
20
1
233
4,526
AI adoption stands on more than the technology people can see. Tools may look like progress, but weak foundations can make the whole structure fragile. Buying AI is the visible part, while making it work is the part that many organizations underestimate. rt @antgrasso.
2
2
81
Mila A. retweeted
Former Google DeepMind researcher Andrew Dai just launched a new AI model called Glimpse. It can reason about images, movement, and changing camera angles. And it's already claiming competitive performance against Google's Astra on visual reasoning benchmarks. This could be a huge step toward AI understanding the physical world.
🤝 Paid partnership
Spent years watching models ace a single image and completely whiff on anything that moves or changes angle. Today we’re fixing that. Try Glimpse now, our first visual thinking model with competitive frontier performance compared to Astra on key public visual reasoning benchmarks.
13
51
150
9,250
If you can’t rerun the figure, you don’t have a result. You have a screenshot. That’s the problem with a lot of “AI for science” right now. @aipoch_ai Open-Science is making actual research accessible to anyone with a question, not just scientists. Website: aipoch.com/ GitHub: github.com/aipoch/open-scien… You can explore data, run code, and test ideas in one open-source workspace. They even tested AI against a simple Wordle algorithm. Both solved all 30 games, but the algorithm slightly outperformed AI. And here's the interesting part. Their new .science format lets you share the research session behind a result, including the evidence and files, so others can inspect it and build on your work. That's the idea behind “Vibe Research”: anyone can investigate an idea and share their findings with researchers worldwide. AIPOCH also reported 79.05% on BiomniBench-DA Public 50 in its internal comparison. #OpenScience
🤝 Paid partnership
Science, Open to All. We're building AIPOCH Open-Science for anyone with a question to explore. Research with AI, preserve the work behind each finding, and share a .science package for others to inspect, reproduce, and build on. Open-Science V 1.0.0 is alive!
7
11
35
7,886
Neoclouds will mostly be rolled up, not shut down. Of course a few will fail. The use of the word cease was clever by Gartner to get more clicks. 👀
Gartner expects 80% of neocloud providers to cease independent operations by 2030. “In 2026, AI providers are expected to spend nearly $1 trillion on AI infrastructure, and are forecast to invest an additional $6 trillion between 2027 and 2030,” said Will Sommer, Sr Director Analyst at Gartner. “However, our research indicates that enterprise and consumer AI revenue will be insufficient to support profitable returns on all planned AI capital expenditures during this period.” “Through 2030, AI data center owners would need to generate a cumulative $8.5 trillion in revenue to cover announced capital spending, financing costs, and a 12% return on invested capital (ROIC), which we assume to be the hurdle rate of investment capital,” said Sommer. “However, total enterprise and consumer AI revenue that can be attributed to AI data centers during this period is forecast to reach no more than $3.6 trillion. Because most AI-native providers operate asset-light business models, we predict that less than half of AI revenue will be earned by providers that own significant AI infrastructure.” Failure to achieve sustainable ROIC on rapidly depreciating assets would almost certainly necessitate write-downs. Based on Gartner projections, a continued AI infrastructure investment trajectory could leave more than $4 trillion in asset value exposed to write-down risk through 2032. In this scenario, Gartner does not expect the 12% ROIC to be achieved until the end of 2032 at earliest. $NBIS $IREN $CRWV
21
8
145
13,206
AI INTERFACES SHOULDN’T BE LOCKED TO ONE PLATFORM @openuidev makes generative UI accessible: → MIT-licensed and open source → Works with your own design system → Supports GPT, Claude, Gemini, and local models → Turns agent responses into interactive experiences The next generation of AI apps won’t just talk. They’ll build the interface you need.
🤝 Paid partnership
For 30 years, technology has moved in one direction: turning information into intuitive interfaces Somehow, the smartest software we’ve ever built took us back to a textbox We’ve spent the last 2 years at @openuidev trying to fix that. 6 months ago we open-sourced it: 10K+ GitHub stars, 6M+ downloads ChatGPT shipped Intelligent UI and showed everyone what it looks like Today we’re releasing OpenUI 1.0 bringing it to every other agent
14
35
1
119
42,761
Mila A. retweeted
Schneider Electric's 2026 study of 1,453 manufacturers found skills gaps in AI or data science cited by 43.0% as the top barrier to industrial AI adoption, ahead of cybersecurity concerns at 21.7%. Legacy infrastructure and lack of contextualized data ranked second and third. #se_ai
4
9
10
304
𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗸 𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗸 𝗺𝘆 𝗘𝗙 𝗖𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝟭𝟬 𝘀𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗱𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝟰𝟬 𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗱𝘀 And I didn't use AI for this (it sucked!) AI wrote the same EF Core mistakes I see in code reviews: ❌ Projecting data in memory after ToListAsync ❌ Making too many database requests ❌ Loading full entities to show 4 columns In development, these queries run in a few milliseconds. But at 2 million rows in production, the same endpoint takes 30 seconds. Your integration tests won't catch it. 👉 The trick: project only the columns you need with .Select() ↳ The database reads less data ↳ Less data goes over the network ↳ No change tracking at all That's 1 of 13 fixes. Here they all are, in the order I apply them 👇 𝗦𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝟬: 𝗠𝗲𝗮𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 ↳ Log the SQL with LogTo and run EXPLAIN ANALYZE 𝗦𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝟭: 𝗙𝗲𝘁𝗰𝗵 𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 ↳ Add indexes for columns you filter and sort on ↳ Filter with Where() before ToListAsync ↳ Project only the columns you need 𝗦𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝟮: 𝗟𝗼𝗮𝗱 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗹𝘆 ↳ AsNoTracking for read-only queries ↳ Include only what you need, no lazy loading ↳ AsSplitQuery for multiple collections (measure first) 𝗦𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝟯: 𝗦𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 ↳ Cursor pagination for deep pages (Skip/Take crawls at page 5,000) ↳ Batch huge Contains() ID lists before they hit DB limits 𝗦𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝟰: 𝗦𝘁𝗼𝗽 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 ↳ Compiled queries for hot paths ↳ Cache the result 𝗦𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝟱: 𝗢𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗶𝘇𝗲 𝘄𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲𝘀 ↳ Call SaveChanges once, outside the loop ↳ ExecuteUpdate and ExecuteDelete for bulk changes ↳ DbContextFactory in background services Don't add caching to hide your slow database queries. You are only fixing the symptoms. First fix your database queries and only after that add caching to make it even faster and to increase your application throughput. 📌 I wrote a step-by-step guide with code for all 13 performance improvements in EF Core: ↳ antondevtips.com/blog/ef-cor… Which of these 13 did you (or your agent) skip in your last project?
7
12
45
1,568
highkey how is deepseek v4.1 flash serving at like 10 cents per 1 billion tokens dude
2
1
8
929
Moral of the story: avoid benchmaxxing, build robust models
AstroLoc was used by Artemis II to localize photos of the Moon taken by astronauts! We built Astroloc two years ago to localize photos of Earth taken by astronauts on the International @Space_Station: the model is so robust that they use it also for the Moon!
2
33
1,784
Your “autonomous” agent just hit an API error and promoted you to unpaid tech support. Restless, from the ReadMe team, puts fix steps and a docs link directly in failed responses so the agent can attempt a fix. I want agent demos with deliberately broken API calls. Show me how much “autonomy” survives when something actually goes wrong.
🤝 Paid partnership
Your API is now your product, and it needs to move as fast as you do. Introducing Restless. Every call, support question, pull request, and error message leaves your API better for the next agent.
2
11
22
8,318
Great example of inference capital markets Today most of us consume inference via subsidized monthly plans, but these won’t last forever and many builders can only use API inference That’s where markets like @dphnAI come in, congrats on this going live!
The Dolphin Inference API is now live Powered by DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, it delivers Opus 5-class coding & agentic performance at 97% lower cost than frontier models $30 free credits for the first 1,000 signups Start building with the cheapest API on the market → dphn.ai/API
14
21
1
105
9,038