Pinned Tweet
Picture this. You’re 28, grinding a decent paycheck in Toronto. Half your money vanishes into rent before you even see it. Groceries feel like a luxury tax. Your friends who scraped together a down payment five years ago are now sitting on paper gains they can’t touch because the market is frozen solid. This isn’t theory. This is the daily reality for millions of young Canadians in 2026.
And the pattern? Left populism wrapped in compassion. It sells emotion first, data second, and it always ends the same way: bigger government, broken promises, and the very people it claims to help left holding the bag.
Look at the numbers right now. Immigration was dialed back after the pre-2024 surge. Result? National rental vacancy rates climbed to 3.1% in 2025, up from 2.2% the year before. Rents are still rising, sure, but the pace has slowed. More units are actually hitting the market. That’s supply and demand finally catching up. Not magic. Basic economics. Yet the same voices who cheered endless inflows now call any restraint heartless.
Federal deficits sit at 2.5% of GDP this year. Debt-to-GDP hovers around the low end of G7 levels. Growth is limping along at just over 1% in the official projections for 2025-26. These numbers come straight from the government’s own books. If spending stays driven by feel-good slogans instead of hard trade-offs, the squeeze on young families only gets tighter.
The current Canadian left playbook is textbook. Wealth taxes, housing justice, green mandates, corporate crackdowns all sold as national interest. The NDP propped up the Liberals until that deal collapsed in 2024, blocking any real conservative alternative. Tactical math or power preservation? You decide. Now, even with fewer seats, they’re still pushing public grocery stores, rent caps, anti-fossil-fuel leaps. The Liberals under their new leader talk stimulus with occasional restraint, but the instinct remains: expand the state, promise relief, deliver compromises.
This isn’t classic class struggle anymore. It’s post-Marxist discourse 101. The people versus the elites. Perfect for winning seats, terrible for building real worker power. Principles get traded for parliamentary survival. You see pharmacare and dental wins celebrated while deficits balloon and courts keep slapping down overreach like the old Emergencies Act. Handouts and rhetoric, but no deep infrastructure for long-term agency.
Here’s the citizen-first principle that cuts through the noise: prioritizing affordability for the people already here isn’t cruelty. It’s the bare minimum of responsible governance. Endless inflows without matching housing and services were never sustainable. Moderated immigration did ease rental pressure. Data confirms it. But so did record supply coming online. Projections suggest the housing market could stabilize by 2028-29 if we keep building and don’t flood the system again.
Left populism leans toward short-term liberal pacts over genuine revolution. Emotional appeals expand the tent. Then power arrives and deals get cut. The base gets disappointed. Not every single time in human history, but often enough that the pattern is hard to ignore. Venezuela and Argentina aren’t identical to Canada, but the warning lights flash the same: when ledgers lose to feelings, ordinary people pay. The flip side? Tough resets can work when reality finally bites.
The fix isn’t rage or isolation. It’s cold data over demagoguery. Cut the waste. Build homes like we mean it. Prioritize citizens already inside the system without pretending every restraint is bigotry. Liberal democracy survives when politicians serve the people inside the system, not by gaslighting them with short-term cheers.
The young family watching rent devour their paycheck while politicians promise public options? That betrayal is real. It fuels the anger you’re seeing. But channeling it into workable realism beats pure emotional socialism every time.
Because here’s the uncomfortable truth young people need to hear: governments don’t print prosperity. They either enable it through sound rules or choke it with feel-good overreach. We’ve got the data. We’ve got the history, messy as it is. The choice is ours.
Prioritize citizens. Build supply. Live within our means. Everything else is just another round of the same old con.
David Eby calls Conservative candidates the most negative, hateful group he’s ever seen.
Here’s what’s actually negative after nearly ten years of NDP government: putting race, gender, and party loyalty ahead of competence and results for ordinary people.
Taxpayer money wasted. Record deficits. Debt roughly doubled. Higher taxes. Public-sector jobs booming while private jobs lag. And when things go wrong, it’s always someone else’s fault.
In a free democracy, the people come first. Not identity checkboxes or loyalty tests. Anyone can see the record. Ten years is long enough.
#bcpoli #BCElection @Dave_Eby
The Conservatives’ platform counts on a pro-growth agenda boosting revenues by billions so they can cut taxes and still shrink the deficit. Those growth numbers look optimistic next to official forecasts, and if the economy doesn’t pick up that fast the math gets tight.
The bigger question is what happened under the NDP. After nine years of more spending, more rules, and bigger government, are things actually better for regular people?
Deficits grew, debt rose fast, and interest costs took a bigger bite. Public-sector jobs exploded while private-sector job growth barely moved. Healthcare spending jumped, yet more people can’t find a family doctor and waits for specialists and surgery got longer. Housing rules aimed at speculators and short-term rentals, but much of the recent rent drop lines up with federal immigration changes and a weaker economy. Uncertainty around land and resource rules also made investment and jobs harder to get moving.
If expanding government and adding regulations for nearly a decade didn’t deliver the stable, affordable life people were promised, why assume more of the same is the safe choice?
The Conservative approach focuses on leaving more money in people’s pockets with tax cuts, speeding up permits so homes and projects get built, slowing government spending growth, and cutting the uncertainty that scares off investment. It’s about getting out of the way so people can work, build, and invest.
You don’t have to buy every growth number. Just look at what already happened when we tried the other path. For most families the practical test is simple: does this put more money in your pocket, create more jobs, and get houses and healthcare moving faster? On the evidence so far, that direction is the one worth trying.
#BCPoli #BCElection2026 #GetBCMoving
The BC Cons have finally released their full costed platform
They are saying their deficit would be smaller than the current NDP's path because of mostly 2 things: "new revenues thanks to the 'pro-growth' agenda" (that's about 2.6b by the 3rd year) and "spending restrains" (reducing the contingency vote, which is a good thing, but also some vague 'efficiency' stuff and a hiring freeze) (that'd would save about 4b by year 3).
The two combined allow the BC Cons to promise new spendings on other things and the massive tax cut (cost of almost 3b) and still have a lower deficit.
Up to you to believe these numbers. The 'pro-growth' stuff seems especially made up. Like "hey the growth is projected at 2.1%, our plan would raise it to 2.8% just because". I don't see any reference or sources for this claim
“Stand together to stop Conservative cuts.”
Translation: Greens, surrender your votes so BC NDP can keep the same failed priorities on housing, drugs, and public order.
This isn’t about protecting services. It’s about protecting the project.
Results matter more than slogans.
#BCElections @bcndp #BCPoli
“I’ve voted Green before, but the risk of a Conservative government is too high. This time, I’m voting BC NDP.” – Melanie McCollum, former Green voter in Courtenay."
We risk losing progress and continuing the work on far too many priorities if we do not come together to stop Conservative chaos and cuts.
bcndp.ca/releases/eby-invite…
Yesterday at the polling station, a woman tried to bring her regular pet dog inside saying “my dog is well-behaved, I want to vote with it.”
Only service animals are allowed. Voting places aren’t dog-walking spots.
Basic respect for the process matters.
#BCElections #CivicDuty #VoteResponsibly
Nanaimo
Mayor: Leonard Krog (re-elected, former BC NDP MLA)
Council: Mostly incumbents (Ben Geselbracht, Paul Manly, Hilary Eastmure, Sheryl Armstrong, Erin Hemmens, Ian Thorpe) plus two newcomers (Andréa Coutu, Marnie Boers)
School Board: Tania Brzovic, Tim Harris, Leana Pellegrin and others elected (Nanaimo-Ladysmith School District)
Direction: Incumbent NDP-background mayor continues. Council remains largely the same with minor changes. Progressive continuity expected, including on education policies such as SOGI.
#Nanaimo #NanaimoBC #BCElections
City of Victoria
Mayor: Marianne Alto (re-elected)
Council: Mix of incumbents and newcomers (Stephen Hammond, Matt Dell, Marg Gardiner, Jeremy Caradonna, Dave Thompson returned; Melissa Cseszko, Jack Sandor, Wendy Bowkett new)
School Board: Maiya Beech and Ann Whiteaker elected (Greater Victoria School District)
Direction: Incumbent mayor stays. Some council refresh but overall continuity in a progressive-leaning city. No major rightward shift. SOGI-related policies are likely to continue under the existing framework.
#Victoria #YYJ #BCElections
North Vancouver District
Mayor: Mike Little re-elected
Council: Mostly incumbents plus some newcomers
School Board: George Tsiakos and others elected
Direction: Incumbent continuity. Stable.
#NorthVancouver #DNV #BCPoli
North Vancouver City
Mayor: Linda Buchanan re-elected
Council: Most incumbents returned
Direction: Status quo. Little change.
#NorthVancouver #NorthVan #BCElections
West Vancouver
Mayor: Kirk LaPointe elected (defeats incumbent Mark Sager)
Council: Mix of new and returning members
School Board: Felicia Zhu, Sheelah Donahue, and others elected
Direction: Transparency and fiscal accountability. Clear change from the previous direction.
#WestVancouver #WestVan #BCPolitics
Port Coquitlam
Mayor: Brad West re-elected
Direction: Incumbents hold. Stable.
#PortCoquitlam #PoCo #BCElections
Coquitlam
Mayor: Craig Hodge (Independent)
Council & School Board: Mix of incumbents and newcomers
Direction: Centrist and practical. Weak party branding.
#Coquitlam #TriCities #BCPoli
Richmond
Mayor: Rob Howard (Richmond Forward)
Council & School Board: Mixed
Direction: Mixed. No clear dominance by one side.
#Richmond #RichmondBC #BCElections
Surrey
Mayor: Doug McCallum (Safe Surrey)
Council: Safe Surrey majority
Direction: Tax freeze and public safety emphasis.
#Surrey #SurreyBC #BCPolitics
Langley City
Mayor: Delaney Mack
Council: Achieving majority
Direction: Budget review and tax restraint.
#LangleyCity #Langley #BCElections
Langley Township
Mayor: Jay Lundgren (Langley Strong)
Council: Langley Strong majority
School Board: Langley Strong wins the Township seats
Direction: Focus on debt and tax management. Center-right, fiscally focused.
#Langley #LangleyStrong #BCPoli
New Westminster
Mayor: Daniel Fontaine (Progressives)
Council: Progressives take 5 of 6 seats
School Board: Progressives take 6 of 7 seats
Direction: NDP-linked forces sharply reduced. Shift toward fiscal responsibility, taxes, and safety. School board mostly replaced, so a different direction is expected.
#NewWestminster #NewWest #BCElections
Burnaby
Mayor: Mike Hurley (Independent) re-elected
Council: BCA (NDP-linked) takes 7 of 8 seats
School Board: BCA sweeps all seats
Direction: Council and school board remain controlled by socialist-leaning NDP-affiliated forces. Almost no change, so existing education policies (including SOGI) will continue.
#Burnaby #BurnabyBC #BCPolitics
Vancouver
Mayor: Pete Fry (Green)
Council: Mostly COPE, Green, and OneCity (ABC holds just one seat)
School Board: Fully controlled by COPE, Green, and OneCity
Direction: Strong extreme-left shift (COPE, OneCity, etc.). Heavy emphasis on housing, climate, and social equity. School board stays on the same path, so SOGI-related policies are likely to continue aggressively.
#Vancouver #VanPoli #BCElections







