Replying to @thsottiaux @rileybrown
Don’t listen to techies. Cowork is good for non-technical which is what the enterprise audience you covet the most.
Codex to regular corporate America sounds like they’re coding and they will not touch it.
Replying to @pilkself
Bunch of people that has their work being trivialized. Welcome to the world where intelligence is commoditized.
“Field Medalist” title will go the way of other titles awarded in the past that no longer hold any relevance.
Ben retweeted
Replying to @GergelyOrosz
I challenge this a bit
(a) Codex was started as an internal tool. The goal was explicitly to build what was the highest leverage tool to accelerate infrastructure buildout.
(b) I don’t think the Meta vs non-Meta is particularly enlightening here. Most of us who came from older tech companies were surprised at how far OpenAI had taken Python scripts and had a desire to scale OpenAI further.
(c) A ton of infrastructure and internal tools were built over the last few years, it’s not the case that we were just waiting for AGI to appear.
Replying to @clumma
Has to do with infrastructure. What OpenAI has is infrastructure like Stargate for training.
Don’t think Anthropic has the same access to that compute.
Meritz Securities (Korean sell side): GPT-6 Astra launch and implications for the memory stock rebound
On September 3, OpenAI unveiled GPT-6 Astra. As interpretations of this model became a hot topic, semiconductor stocks rebounded on September 4 even as the broader US market fell on rising rates following a jobs surprise, with the DRAM ETF up 6.6% versus the prior day.
Astra's implication is unlikely to be simply whether AGI has been achieved. What drew the most attention was the score of 99.9% on ARC-AGI-3, a benchmark used to judge AGI, a huge improvement over the previous model (Sol at 7.8%). This benchmark is not a knowledge test; it evaluates a model's ability to learn on its own in an abstract environment it has never seen before, and this is where the improvement over the previous model was large. General intelligence, as measured by AAII or Humanity's Last Exam, did not improve much.
The differentiated strength improved in Astra is "the ability to acquire skills that humans learn in an unfamiliar environment as efficiently as a human does." Where AI until now found the answer by pressing this and that 100 times, Astra has started to behave more like a human: observing the phenomenon, inferring the rules, and executing right away.
The key point is "an expanded scope for replacing human intelligence and human work." If existing AI was an AI that told you what to do, Astra is closer to an AI that, given only a goal, uses the computer directly and produces the result all the way to the end. In other words, an easy to use OpenAI model has begun to handle on its own part of the agent orchestration layer that had been the domain of less accessible tools such as OpenClaw. For users, the barrier to entry for AI agents has been lowered, meaning more work can be handed over.
Expansion of AI workloads
Astra naturally also comes with efficiency gains that lower the token cost per task versus the previous model. This is a trend across the AI industry as a whole, and if AI workloads were fixed, demand for AI data centers would have to plunge.
The reason Jevons paradox continues to operate even after token price declines became a trend following the rise of Chinese models is that AI technological progress also expands the workload. What Astra's technological progress means is that where humans used to hand five minute, ten minute, and twenty minute tasks to AI, as AI performance improves and token prices get cheaper there is more to hand over, such as one hour and 24 hour tasks.
Just as news flow about rising GPU rental prices has spread since Astra's arrival, it must be understood that falling AI token prices do not necessarily shrink or slow the AI hardware TAM. Rather, one should recognize that the emergence of a model like Astra can create another inflection point for the AI industry and structurally grow AI demand.
Our understanding is that since early July, as the pace of GPU rental price increases slowed and token prices fell, a long IGV (software) / short SOX (semiconductors) pair trade has persisted in the US. This is because falling token prices were interpreted as positive for software, where tokens are a cost, but negative for infrastructure.
If progress in models like Astra structurally spreads AI workloads and GPU rental prices begin to respond again, the perception that falling token prices are bad news for AI infrastructure companies could weaken (on 9/4 the DRAM ETF rebounded while IGV fell).
As we have argued consistently, the issues accumulating in the AI industry since June (the proliferation of open models, this GPT-6 Astra release, and so on) are, in our interpretation, positive catalysts that generate new demand for AI infrastructure and hardware that did not exist before. We think that in a phase where rates are rising overall and liquidity is becoming scarce, these accumulated positives are not being reflected.
The stock market in September is still uncomfortable with high rates, and within the Korean market there remain hurdles to get through, including digesting a round of earnings estimate cuts driven by the sharp won appreciation before the 3Q26 preview season. There is still discomfort standing in the way of the accumulated positives being reflected in a sustained trend. Overall, we continue to view the market conservatively.
Even so, as emphasized in our September strategy, we believe one should not substantially empty out positions in core AI infrastructure stocks centered on memory. Positive catalysts not reflected in share prices are accumulating. While our baseline is conservative through mid October, one should keep the upside risk open that the trend, led by AI and semiconductor leaders, could turn at any time, even before October.
Replying to @ravikiran_dev7
I think it’s you who doesn’t know the product. He’s asking company owners. Not your ass who don’t use api.
Replying to @FLupi35753 @ravikiran_dev7
Yea. He’s asking businesses not you who don’t have a business.
Replying to @TrendSpider
People will point to this as the next dotcom bubble. lol. This is exactly the reason why it’s NOT the dotcom ppl.
These guys have enough cash on hand and free cash flow to fund big capex numbers. Capex that will be monetized soon enough.
Replying to @rodamn @farzyness
That’s all data. From an analytics perspective, out of UPS, FEDEX, DHL, and the small 3PL companies… $AMZN has the resources, quantitative analytics, and experience down.
Bro stop it. The shorts and nonbelievers are already having a bad week.
Show some mercy.
J/k. Burn those shorts.
As AI capabilities advance, so do the methods used to discover and exploit vulnerabilities.
That’s why Intel is joining Project Glasswing alongside @AnthropicAI and industry leaders: to help proactively identify and remediate security flaws before adversaries can take advantage, leveraging Intel’s unique role at the foundation of the computing stack—from silicon and firmware to platform software.
Securing modern AI systems requires protecting the infrastructure the world already depends on.
More here: ms.spr.ly/6015Q4Ltd
$200B in 2026 capex. "Not on a hunch." Already has customer commitments for a big chunk.
That's $AMZN telling the market: we're not speculating on AI demand, we're filling backlog. When the buyer with the biggest checkbook says supply is the constraint, not demand... that tells you where we are in the cycle.
$NVDA $TSM $AVGO all benefit. The capex arms race isn't slowing down.
$AMZN #AI
Amazon $AMZN CEO Andy Jassy just said:
"We’re not investing approximately $200 billion in capex in 2026 on a hunch" ... "Of the AWS capex we expect to spend in 2026, much of which will be monetized in 2027-2028, we already have customer commitments for a substantial portion of it."
"We are willing to make large capex investments and endure short-term FCF headwinds for the substantial medium to long-term FCF surplus. AI is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity where the current growth is unprecedented and the future growth even bigger."
Export controls are the one variable my models can't price.
$TSM at $364, RSI 60.8, +6.6% in 5 days. Full MA stack bullish, sitting in 90th percentile of its 52-week range.
XGBoost model flags 94% pullback probability with price above upper Bollinger Band. But geopolitical risk like this is binary... reprices everything or gets absorbed in a week.
Watching $ASML and Tokyo Electron first. They're the canary.
$TSM #semiconductors
Scoop: House Republicans are preparing for an April 22 vote on a slate of new chip export bills that would significantly tighten U.S. control over the global semiconductor supply chain.
Would impact companies like ASML, Tokyo Electron, TSMC ⬇️
washingtonpost.com/wp-intell…
$AMD at $235, RSI 67, +12% in 5 days. Full MA stack is bullish (10 > 20 > 50 > 200).
But my XGBoost model says 98% probability of a pullback here. Price sitting above the upper Bollinger Band at 1.11 standard devs.
Technicals and ML don't always agree. When they diverge like this, I trust the model on short-term timing but the MAs on direction.
Translation: I want to buy this dip, not chase this rip.
$AMD #semiconductors
$AMD DCF: The risk/reward is looking very attractive here. 📈
The current guidance does not bake in the $META deal at all or any margin or CPU price increases. I believe the bull case is the most likely outcome.
🐻 Bear Case (Recession/Intel Recovery)
• EPS Growth: 25%
• Exit P/E: 30x
• Annual Return: 1%
⚖️ Base Case (Guidance/Consensus)
• EPS Growth: 50%
• Exit P/E: 40x
• Annual Return: 28.4%
🚀 Bull Case (Meta Scaling + AI Dominance)
• EPS Growth: 65%
• Exit P/E: 60x
• Annual Return: 53.2%
#Stocks #StockMarket #Investing #FinTwitt
Five red Fridays in a row and people still buying calls into the weekend. Dealers are short gamma, VIX term structure is inverted, and tariff headlines drop every Sunday night.
Maybe stop fighting the pattern and start trading it.
$META distribution advantage is the part people keep overlooking. ChatGPT has ~200M users. Meta has 3.5B.
You don't need the best model if you own the distribution. And Zuck is spending $60B+ on AI capex this year to close the model gap anyway.
With Muse Spark, $META has entered the consumer AI race with the largest distribution engine on the planet.
3.5B users across Facebook and Instagram.
Is this the moment the AI race shifts?
Replying to @beffjezos












