Arasaka Tower | @outpostfnf
Tranquillity
Joined May 2024
- Tweets4.6K
- Following800
- Followers1.6K
- Likes16.2K
So the funds are... unsafu?
Our teams are aware of reports of a potential security issue and are actively investigating. User funds are completely safe.
Our security teams are reviewing all relevant information with urgency, and we will provide updates through official Binance channels as soon as we have verified information.
Users should remain cautious of scams and should not trust unofficial links, messages, or requests for account information.
And there’s nothing wrong with these “trenchers” everyone on chain is just a product of their environment, if holding times were rewarded people would hold but the current market doesn’t reward and hasn’t rewarded that for quite some time.
The market has adapted to low liquidity, holding times have dropped.
I find it distasteful and just full cope that these og’s shit on the modern participant. Everyone came into this game expecting to hold to the 1000x but the market forced them to adapt if they wanted to make money.
Telling people to do other wise without giving them another asset class to play in just shows me these og’s just arent working as hard as the new participant who is profitable onchain.
The reality is that most are lazy and got hand fed in the early days, it was easy and now they can’t compete so they cope by shitting on “trenchers” for their hold times.
The end goal is to make money, not sit on Twitter with an ego because you can hold longer. As long as you aren’t scamming and being non genuine onchain, do what ever you like, hold as long as you want, but most importantly learn how to adapt.
That is your biggest edge
There is a major inefficiency in the active crypto market right now. Let me explain.
There are different types of traders.
Most crypto OG's like myself are value traders. We find mispriced assets based on the projects fundamentals and potentital, bid them, and sell them when others realize the value.
"Trenchers" or "Attention traders" are focused on low-value narratives, holder counts, deployer track records, weird conspiracies about the dev sharing a bunk with Vitalik in Estonia while at basket weaving camp, etc.
These people make most of their money pretending something is not a scam, so they can make money in the gap: between people not knowing it is a scam, and people realizing that it is a scam.
This fairly normal. But the ratio is not. And it does not stay this way.
Currently, onchain value traders are the minority. Most of us are holding 80% majors going into this cycle. We understand that onchain season does not truly begin until after majors have a moment. Which they seem to be right now. These are the people with the majority of the liquidity in this space. Nobody with real money is bidding shitcoins on <insert blockchain> right now.
Currently, most of the active liquidity is Trenchers and Attention traders. This is why we see such dramatic Pump and Dumps as liquidity flows from narrative to narrative, uncertain what is happening because no serious traders have started participating. (Traders with hold times above 24 hours).
This environment prevents most anything from holding or running to new highs (i know there are exceptions) simply because of the mechanics.
This is not complex.
Majors move first. Over 70% of crypto liquidity is held in L1 tokens with no smart contracts. Not even on the chains we use. You guys are trading against literal ghosts and demons.
The real show starts when that real money starts moving to smart contract chains like @base, @solana, etc. Good luck.
Blink (財務自由) retweeted
People keep misunderstanding this. I CONTRIBUTED to Bostrom’s Superintelligence book and he thanks me by name in the foreword.
I was thinking about AI safety long before 2014.
Elon Musk posted this back in 2014 after reading Nick Bostrom’s Superintelligence:
“Worth reading Superintelligence by Bostrom. We need to be super careful with AI. Potentially more dangerous than nukes”
That was more than 12 years ago....long before the current AI boom
The book explores what happens when machine intelligence surpasses human intelligence, the existential risks that follow and the enormous challenge of keeping superintelligence aligned with humanity
Elon was sounding the alarm on this years before AI safety became mainstream....when most people barely understood what superintelligence even meant
Today we now have a clear understanding that AI will become the most powerful technology humanity has ever created
Making sure it remains aligned with humanity matters more than anything else
Blink (財務自由) retweeted
My hopes for the Sift coming to #Minecraft Java and Bedrock
1. A mostly peaceful dimension ☮️
2. We can live there, like in the Overworld and Nether
4. Purple💜 green💚 or blue💙 wood set
5. Moveable particles effects ✨
Blink (財務自由) retweeted
So if FLI (EA AI Doomer org) was seeded with $600M in Shiba Inu proceeds injected into Vitalik's, wallet... how much should I aim for to seed an e/acc think tank to take on the Doomers? 🤔
Time to build a war chest.
E/ACC vs. D/ACC: THE DEBATE
@VitalikButerin thinks slowing down AGI by four years is worth it. @beffjezos thinks that's exponential opportunity cost. They debated it live, moderated by @eddylazzarin and @shawmakesmagic.
00:00 Opening
07:02 Thermodynamics and first principles
16:04 Acceleration, entropy, and civilization
28:29 The core disagreement
32:42 Comparing and contrasting e/acc and d/acc
36:20 Open source, open hardware, and local intelligence
54:18 Should AI be slowed down?
1:02:35 Autonomous agents and artificial life
1:21:07 Crypto as the trust layer between humans and AI
1:35:37 Closing arguments
Robinhood has robinhood:0x2e8c31162b855a2ffa90f6f8634643ad6f111e18, Solana has e/acc. Not mid-curving this one
