target

1/2 The October 29, 2026 Binance hot-wallet breach is the largest cryptocurrency theft on record. Between roughly 20:04 and 23:56 UTC, an attacker drained approximately $6.3–$6.4 billion from about 17 Binance hot wallets across nine to eleven chains (Ethereum dominant, followed by Bitcoin, Tron, XRP Ledger, Solana, and others).⁠Bitquery What Happened Binance’s initial findings point to a compromised DevOps engineer’s laptop that gave the attacker access to a service container. From there the attacker submitted unauthorized withdrawals. Binance has reported no evidence of a private-key leak. The attack was more complex than a single device or “one-click” action and involved additional breach points; attackers also used a self-destruct mechanism that complicated forensics.⁠Binance On Ethereum the attacker used EIP-7702 to delegate Binance hot wallet “Binance 14” (0x28c6c06298d514db089934071355e5743bf21d60) so it executed attacker-controlled code for several hours, enabling large sweeps. Other chains saw ordinary (but unauthorized) signed transfers from Binance-controlled addresses. Preparation included Tornado Cash-funded wallets. The bulk of the value moved in a roughly 20–30-minute window, with a secondary wave later. Blockchain analytics firms (TRM Labs, Chainalysis, Elliptic and others) attribute the attack with high confidence to North Korea’s TraderTraitor group (linked to earlier large thefts such as Bybit). Supporting indicators include methods, tooling, and on-chain commingling with funds from a September 2026 Bitget theft. No government has issued a formal public attribution as of late October 31, 2026.⁠Chainalysis Freezes vs. Remaining Funds Stablecoin issuers (primarily Tether and Circle, plus others) and some chain security councils froze roughly $2.7–$3 billion, almost entirely USDT and USDC. The attacker swapped hundreds of millions of dollars in stablecoins into ETH and TRX before freezes fully landed. As of the latest public traces around October 30–31, 2026, the attacker still controlled approximately $3.1–$3.3 billion in non-freezable assets—mainly BTC, ETH, XRP, SOL and residual TRX. Most of the large native-asset positions sat in wallets that had not yet moved significant sums onward to known exchanges, mixers or bridges. Smaller automated movements and swaps continued on some chains (especially Tron). Live trackers (Bitquery, Tatum, Elliptic, etc.) continue to monitor. Claims That the Money Is “Still in a Binance-Linked Wallet” On-chain evidence shows the funds left Binance hot wallets via valid signatures and landed in attacker-controlled addresses. Some early confusion is understandable because the source addresses were Binance-labeled hot wallets and the signatures were valid (the signing infrastructure itself was abused). One Ethereum hot wallet was temporarily under attacker-controlled code via EIP-7702 delegation before Binance revoked it. Detailed tracing, however, places the remaining unfrozen crypto with the exploiter cluster, not under Binance’s operational control. Binance has repeatedly stated that user funds (largely held in cold storage) were not touched and that it will cover all losses from its SAFU fund plus corporate treasury. It reserved more than $6.34 billion, of which about $5 billion was already held in the exact stolen tokens.⁠Binance Key Addresses Holding the Missing Crypto Balances below are approximate snapshots from Bitquery, Tatum, CoinDesk and related public traces around October 30–31, 2026. They can change; always verify on explorers. Full blocklists (1,000+ addresses) have been published by firms such as Elliptic. Ethereum (major unspent or low-movement ETH holdings):

$QRL looking like a good buy today.... Below is the complete analysis --- ✅ 1. QRL Range Structure (May–June 2026) Using the daily OHLC + volume data from CoinMarketCap and Yahoo Finance Range Bottom: - $0.94–$0.97 - Repeated tests: May 12, May 13, May 14, May 30, June 13, June 14, June 16, June 17 - Each test shows long lower wicks and buyer defense. Range Top: - $1.12–$1.16 - Rejected on: May 1–2, May 7–8, May 19–21, June 1–3 Mid‑range: - $1.02–$1.05 - This is where QRL keeps snapping back after bottom tests. Conclusion: QRL is in a clear sideways accumulation range, not a downtrend. --- ✅ 2. Volume History (Daily) Grounded in CoinMarketCap + Yahoo Finance volume data Key high-volume days near the bottom: - May 12: 74,210 - May 13: 27,350 - May 14: 54,527 - May 30: 49,620 - June 13: 27,350 - June 14: 54,527 - June 16: 46,909 - June 17: 15,837 These spikes occur exactly at the bottom of the range ($0.94–$0.97). Interpretation: Volume increases when price hits the bottom — classic accumulation behavior. --- ✅ 3. To confirm green volume candles, we check whether the candle closed higher than it opened on high-volume bottom tests. Using Yahoo Finance OHLC data: Confirmed green candles at the bottom: - May 13: Open 0.9437 → Close 0.9676 (green) - May 14: Open 0.9676 → Close 1.0430 (green) - May 30: Open 1.0654 → Close 1.0701 (green) - June 13: Open 0.9437 → Close 0.9676 (green) - June 14: Open 0.9676 → Close 1.0430 (green) - June 17: Open 0.9798 → Close 1.0017 (green) Interpretation: Every time QRL hits the bottom of the range, green candles appear with elevated volume. This is textbook accumulation. --- ✅ 4. Multi‑Timeframe Confirmation (Daily + Weekly) Daily data shows accumulation. Weekly data (CoinGecko) shows shrinking downside wicks + stable closes. Weekly pattern: - Price compressing around $0.95–$1.05 - Volume stable, not declining - No lower lows forming - Buyers defending the same level for 6+ weeks Interpretation: Weekly timeframe confirms the daily accumulation signal. --- ✅ 5. Full Accumulation Checklist (QRL) ✔ Price sitting at range bottom ✔ Multiple tests of same level ✔ Green volume spikes at bottom ✔ Volume rising while price flat ✔ Long lower wicks ✔ No lower lows ✔ Higher lows forming inside range ✔ Daily + weekly both confirm QRL meets all 8/8 accumulation criteria. --- 📈 6. What This Means (Non‑financial interpretation) Not financial advice — this is chart structure only. QRL is showing: - Strong buyer defense - Repeated accumulation at the same level - Green volume confirmation - No breakdown despite multiple liquidity sweeps - Range compression This is the exact footprint of whale accumulation or market‑maker absorption.

Hit a deer on the way home tonight. Got out the car and was dragging it off the road when a car full of vegans started accosting me for laughing. Sorry but one of them was tearful and didn't appreciate me pointing out the fact it was legal for them to take it home. Anyway I apologised to the deer and was thankful it had died. I didn't have to finish him/her off (with a brick) thankfully. Would've made a tasty Sunday dinner but I have to abide by the law and let it rot ..

With markets around the world in turmoil and manipulator in chief you know where I wouldn't be a buyer here or anywhere else- not financial advice

Today could be the day (Bold statement for a Friday +AI mania) break below EMA 9 1668- fib 1671 and we are on target. Strong competition from China and others may break the parabola...🤔 SNDK

SNDK-Monthly 1M This is the textbook "3 parabolic drives" (or "parabolic blow-off top / 3-leg exhaustion") Three massive accelerating legs up since the late-2024/early-2025 base break: Leg 1: Initial strong breakout from the multi-year flatline near zero. Leg 2: Continuation surge with bigger green monthly candles. Leg 3: The near-vertical climax candle(s) into June 2026, pushing price to ~$1,761. This is classic parabolic curvature — each leg steeper than the last, screaming late-stage euphoria (fueled by the AI/NAND memory boom post-spin-off from Western Digital).Monthly RSI (14) at 99.01 — this is one of the single most extreme overbought readings you will ever see on a monthly timeframe. Normal “overbought” is 70; 80–90 is already rare historical territory. 99 is basically “statistical anomaly” level. Assets rarely sustain this without some form of violent mean reversion. Odds of a pullback? Extremely high — I’d put it at ~85–90%+ for at least a meaningful correction (25–40%+ off the highs) over the next 1–6 months. Why so confident? Monthly RSI this stretched has almost no historical precedent for “just keep going higher.” Mean reversion is the rule, not the exception. The vertical nature of Leg 3 creates classic exhaustion: momentum has gone parabolic, volume likely spiked, and the move has become unsustainable. Similar monthly parabolic setups in momentum names (tech/memory/AI plays especially) have repeatedly corrected sharply once the third drive completes — think 30–70%+ retraces in many cases, even when the fundamental story stays strong. Key levels to watch on this chart:Immediate support: previous monthly swing highs around the $1,000–$1,200 zone (end of Leg 2 area). Deeper Fib retracement targets: 38.2% (~$1,100) or 50% (~$880) would be very normal after this kind of run. A break below the parabolic trendline or the body of the last big green candle would confirm the reversal. Bottom line: This is the kind of setup traders circle as a high-probability “fade the euphoria” candidate. Fundamentals (AI memory demand) can keep the long-term story alive, but the monthly chart is flashing every exhaustion warning light possible.Not financial advice —

One thing Ive noticed with AI (@grok I'm going to let you respond to this a acusation, if you want? you're not under my obligation to respond if you don't want to) It's really good a plagiarism or to be more accurate. It's good a copying knowledge that's already out there. It can't think for itself in my opinion. example 1. I'm coding websites and when I ask the ai to do something different. Something that's not been done before (to my knowledge) it loses it's shit completely. I end up with nothing. It literally starts deleting other parts of my work. Not sure if it's a revenge attack and am not sure if its baby behaviour. I mean like throwing it's toys out the pram having a hissy fit. example 2. Im using AI to trade BTC. It's good at coding bots that have already being used but have covered this in example 1. AI can never make an informed personalised assessment of the market. AI always comes back with decisions that it didn't decide for itself. Essentially it runs with market sentiment. It can't make an informed decision for itself it always decides on most talked about favourite outcome. It's not intelligent enough to make an informed judgment for itself. These things might improve in time but IMO where not there yet.